Search

Steiner System For Pick-5 LottosReply
I was checking that Steiner wheel against the 10 years history of Ohio's Buckeye5 game(5/37) with 2622 drawings and 1690 of them had all numbers below 35 and this is the results: MATCH 2 = 40584 =$40,584 MATCH 3 = 4134 =$41,340 MATCH 4 = 119 =$29,750 MATCH 5 = 1 =$100,000 Total winnings =$211,674 Cost to play =$356,592 Loss =$144,918So even with a wheel that guarantee a match 3, you can still lose a lot of money. The best strategy is t
Jun 8, 2004, 10:38 am - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

MegaMillions picks 06/08/2004Reply
I will be using 37 numbers, but I hope to reduce the amount of lines by placing those numbers in their most frequent positions and limiting the combinations to the most frequent sums and ranges. I will put all 52 numbers in to my RNG, but the parameters I use will disqualify 15 of them for sure and maybe more. I'm hopeful that 10-20 lines will be generated.RJOh
Jun 8, 2004, 2:00 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

MegaMillions picks 06/08/2004Reply
RJOH:That's exactly what I'm trying to do. Wheel only 12 number's hoping the 5 that hit are in those twelve number's. I am getting a little better in picking the Powerball number. The last six games I picked (6) possible #'s and each time the Powerball number was one of the six number's.I've been trying to zero in on some ideas and stats that I've been studying the past month and a half. Good luck Tuesday. Chief
Jun 7, 2004, 6:07 pm - kbcherokee - Jackpot Games Forum

Ticket buying.Reply
I seldom buy less tickets when the jackpot is low because I've never won a jackpot and 2nd prize is usually the same regardless of the jackpot size and I've always been happy when I've won that prize. If 2nd prize is not worth playing for while hoping to win the jackpot, then it not worth playing at all. 10-20 lines should be enough to cover most of the numbers and give you a fair chance to win in any lottery.RJOh
Jun 7, 2004, 2:28 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Pick 3 strategiesReply
Sounds like you should be trying it, instead of asking for more information. $300 is good if he didn't spend or loss as much. When you try it, post the numbers in the prediction sections and we all will see how good it works.Good luck to you.RJOh
Jun 7, 2004, 2:08 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Pick 3 strategiesReply
A real buddy would have told you what he spent/loss/won. If he didn't tell you the full story with all the figures, he wasn't a real buddy.RJOh
Jun 7, 2004, 1:55 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

MegaMillions picks 06/08/2004
When looking at MegaMillion 215 draw history, I noticed that 80% of the numbers have hit 17 or more times and covered 85% of the 4 and 5 winning combinations and 68 of the last 100 drawings haven't included a number from the previous drawing. If I adjust my numbers playing pool accordingly, I would reduce its size from 52 to 37 numbers making it more like a Buckeye5 game and maybe increase my odds of a match 5 by 500%. Just a thought of one way to reduce my picks for Tuesday drawing.Good luck Me
Jun 7, 2004, 11:00 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Does A Jackpot Win Use Up All Your Luck?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by DoctorEw220 on June 06, 2004i voted for not at all because it people have won multi-million dollar jackpots more than once.I read some where (don't remember where) that the percent of big winners among previous jackpot winners is higher than among the general playing public so luck may not be a factor. That small group may have different playing habits than the general public. RJOh
Jun 6, 2004, 12:55 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

June 4 MMReply
I used similar parameters of the third group to pick 10 lines for Buckeye5 yesterday and matched 3 again. I also matched 2 twice for a overall $2 profit so I will be experimenting with Tuesday picks to see what I come up with ten lines or less. Matching three is no big win, but it lowers the cost of playing. Good luck fellow MegaMillions players. Hopefully one of us will win big.RJOh
Jun 6, 2004, 12:40 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

LS 1.8 screenshotReply
Sounds like Lottosynchronizer is evolving into a more traditional lottery program that uses the past histories and the most recent trends of the drawings to make its predictions than a theory of randomness that was the bases of its beginning. Does this mean it will work faster also?RJOh
Jun 6, 2004, 12:10 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum