Search

calculate to winReply
People, pretty much are stuck with their ideals, anything outside the norm is deemed crazy. You hit it right on the nail ' members skim over the reading'. We all know the wave function in the study of trig., this function replaces and simplify all the wave charts and graphs I see on various threads- some like it simple, others like complexity. If you imagine the event as cyclic, then COS/SIN fn is very effective, knowing how to deduce the string depends on each individual. The assumption shou
Oct 9, 2014, 3:45 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

New Systems Forum just based on real stats and facts!Reply
If #3 is random event, then you contradict yourself with #2 (which is just assertion, not a fact) When you backtest a theory, the results achieved are highly dependent on the movements of the tested period. Backtesting a theory assumes that what happens in the past will happen in the future, and this assumption can cause potential risks for the strategy. In inference of data, the options are many, Bayesian concept uses PRIOR data and adjust data for predictions during and after event cycl
May 17, 2014, 11:06 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Deviation AnalysisReply
If you study the lowest drawn and the highest drawn numbers for each draw ignoring the rest then the deviation becomes more useful and can produce good results but only for the two outer numbers, the reason for this is due to the limits of the initial pool, if you split the draw result into numerical order then plot each set to a graph you will see the outer numbers are limited to around half the possibilities of the middle set of numbers , this then reflects in the overall possibility of choosi
Apr 20, 2014, 6:59 pm - Developer - Lottery Systems Forum

Any Pick3 system with past performace proof?Reply
'Consider the possibility that the draws are not random' I think the inverse of above should be assumed to see the big picture, the abstract explanation is all good, but does not negate the fact that all the balls are memory-less, your only connection or how you relate to the ' dynamics'of the event is digital identification. Lets assume all the balls have the same color wthout numbers before the event, how do you identify the precceding/successive draws? I thought all the balls has the s
Jan 17, 2014, 8:05 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Any Pick3 system with past performace proof?Reply
Where do you place the intuitional part?, it seems everything is relegated to this machine. Seriously, you think you need SERIOUS analysis for this random event? SCENERIO Imagine 9 white balls without identification(Digits) in a hopper, can you differentiate the outcomes of preceeding and sequent draws? All your analysis is based on the fact that the balls are numbered, take the IDs out of the picture and try to predict these outcomes. The balls have no memory, hence preceeding has no impact
Jan 14, 2014, 7:39 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Florida man wins multimillion lottery jackpot for 2nd timeReply
Congrats to Mr. Bozeman. Winning the lottery one is usually a once in a lifetime event. But to win it twice (although not unheard of is a extremely rare event) I would be happy to win it just once but it if it happened to me this would be my theme song.... World Series attiude, champagne bottle life, Nothing every changes so tonight is like tommorrow night. I will a model wife, Your b-tch is as hot as ice, Every time you see me I look like I hit the lotto TWICE! DRAKE (Verse from Miss M
Nov 1, 2013, 3:31 am - s5thomps - Lottery News

Who' s to say...Reply
There is absolutely nothing you can do to prevent somebody from claiming you had an oral contract to share a prize with them. As long as you don't offer to share a prize with somebody there is absolutely no way they can prove that you had an oral contract to share with them. The idea about telling people you are playing alone is all well and good, but offers no proof that you didn't decide to make an exception for some reason. Swearing an affidavit that you generally play alone, but would
Oct 18, 2013, 2:31 am - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Your thoughts on Mega Millions Matrix Change?Reply
Well maybe I'm not in my right mind but I'd buy the plier because I'm only buying one ticket and I want the max in the unlikely event that I win. I look at it the same way as playing a multi-coin progressive slot machine, I always play the max number of coins cuz I want the max payoff in the unlikely event that I win. Or compared to baseball, with one ticket I might not come up to bat much but if and when I connect, I wanna knock it out of the freakin' park with everybody on. I want the
Aug 11, 2013, 12:05 am - rdgrnr - Lottery Discussion Forum

Given the recent event: Would you allow or do you cut in line on occasion to purchase a ticket?
I never have-The last LLC- Lottery Line Cutter came out smelling more than a Rose.. * Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it- George Bernard Shaw. -Have a Great Weekend People. .
Jun 28, 2013, 2:36 pm - noise-gate - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Code has already been brokenReply
Thanks for the post but WWII was sixty years ago. I do not share your belief that their LIVES ARE AT STAKE. Moreover, a messge is NOT A RANDOM event. Lottery games are comprised of RANDOM EVENTS, and using any system on the planet - even Enigma - will not help you very much. I do believe, however, that nothing is really random. Every event has a cause. When things do appear to be random, it is because we have not determined the cause.
Jun 3, 2013, 2:59 pm - hennybogan - Lottery Discussion Forum