Search

Don't you just hate when people are negative if your system doesn't work for themReply
What a lot of people fail to realize is that all systems are tools. It is no different than a steak knife, central air, toothpick, shoes, computer, ect... These are tools used to make our lives better. A lottery system is a tool used to help you select winning numbers. It is not the lottery system that is flawed, it is the user that is flawed. The lottery system is a tool to be used to help you think and grow to a new level. If you find fault with the system, great. Your response to any problem
Nov 8, 2009, 12:39 pm - PERDUE - Lottery Discussion Forum

Wheeling question. Pick and win?Reply
I think it only fair to seperate prediction from wheeling. To use a car metaphor: Prediction is the engine, wheeling is the transmission. Without the engine we're not going anywhere. When the prediction engine is working, wheeling allows us to select what prize gear we want to be in. i.e.: Third prize gear, Forth prize gear, Fifth prize gear and even Sixth jackpot prize overdrive gear. Each capable of winning the jackpot race, though less likely in the lower prize gears. The pr
Sep 13, 2009, 12:06 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

How would you re-create these 2 groups the fastest way ?Reply
rindo..... thanks for the info on the free Wheel Engine info from Lotteryusa.... but I am pretty sure that wheel runs into the same problem in recreating the Alpha groups ...... it simply spits out an uneven wheel result using 5 digits ......the results end up being 60 singles ...60 doubles and 5 trips for each ... which are not the right totals. I could be wrong and you could be doing something with it I don't know about .....but from what I see it is limited as well. Although ....
Jun 18, 2009, 6:50 pm - WIN D - Mathematics Forum

LottoWikiReply
The whole copyright/intelectual property rights violation thing is my biggest concern. As a Wiki, my site would be editable by anyone. Hence, if you had your own system, you could put it in. No problem there. If you knew of a system that is so common that no one knows who started it, there still wouldn't be much of a problem (if any) in putting it on my site. But, suppose your source is copyrighted material. If you sumarized it in your own words, you could claim fair use. I'm not sure how wel
Feb 16, 2009, 12:31 pm - DMW774 - Lottery Systems Forum

Has anyone here read Gail Howard's book-Lottery Master Guide?Reply
If I knew the sum was going to be 101 in any 5/39 game, I still have 9339 combinations. And ever if I also knew 2 of the numbers would be even and three of the numbers are low, I still have 2585 combos. But the drawings are random so it's guessing whether I'm doing the guessing or an artificial intelligence is. We can still use past results for of a more educated guess, but by using these type of filters, we are guessing which group of combos will hit and lotteries don't offer group bets. Cau
Oct 27, 2008, 12:14 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Mega Million SystemReply
First of all I have to agree that the lotteries will never be shut down - just as the casinos have control over their odds the lotteries have to have some kinda control over what they pay out. But for once I for would like to hear one new idea presented here without all the negative bullspit to go with it. I have not seen and probably never will see one system presented here that had all the answers, however there have been several systems that combined together gave some pretty good fighting
Feb 25, 2008, 8:23 pm - user044 - Lottery Systems Forum

In the ongoing quick picks discussions...Reply
As for PB and MM and systems players, know anyone who has won consistently? Know anyone who hits 5 + 0 consistently? posted by Coin Toss I suspect if such a player existed, there would be an investigation to see if he had friends or family members connected to the drawings or had a way of hacking the terminals after a drawing to produce a winning ticket. No one would believe a system could do that even with thousand of tickets. Even having several 5+0 winners in a short period of tim
Sep 18, 2007, 6:46 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Testing lotteries backward.Reply
It might be as simple as finding a numerical relationship from one draw to the next or a group of numbers to the next by looking at past results and seeing if that relationship continues. The problem is because it's a random draw, those numerical relationships are just as random. There is a program called Maxhit Pro that has hundreds of systems, scans whatever number of history draws you choose, and shows which system(s) that hit the most. All games of chance have a rhythem, we are tryin
Jul 4, 2007, 2:34 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

If Your State Pre-Test's its Draws List it hereReply
The statistician they use (and there's a reason they use a statistician and not just somerun of the mill government bureaucrat) won't think 1,2,3,4,5 means there's a problem, but what if he did? If it's a pre-test it doesn't matter whether or not they think there's a problem. It's a test and the outcome doesn't determine the winning numbers. Your combination turning up in the pre-test is exactly like a combination you didn't play coming up in the real drawing: you don't win. Simple as that, and
Mar 28, 2007, 7:04 am - lotterybraker - Lottery Discussion Forum

Backlash in Calif. over sale of lottery operator GTECHReply
After being shown internal investigative documents obtained from the government on the merger, lawmakers and others questioned the buyer's antitrust conviction, lotto terminal shutdowns, lack of audits, absence of vendor and employee background checks and whether the U.S. accounting and legal probes of the deal were adequate. I'm still trying to figure out what this paragraph means. What is anti-trust conviction ? Are they implying that GTECH or Lottomatica was convicted of violating anti-
Dec 6, 2006, 1:48 pm - Drivedabizness - Lottery News