Search

something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?Reply
rjoh, if guru didnt think there was a solution he wouldnt have sold lottosync which is a software for trying to predict randomness in lottery draws, i am sure he will provide sufficient evidence of this in future versions of the software. its not there yet which he will admit himself, however at least its a chance.good luck to you
Apr 17, 2004, 4:04 pm - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum

something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on April 17, 2004when you start getting interested into trying to solve a problem, the solution tends to be found quicker.Paul, you talk as if randomness in lotteries is a problem that has a solution, when most other people think randomness is a necessary elements in every lottery in order to guarantee that every player has an equal and fair chance to win and it's the job of lotteries commissions to make sure it stays that way.RJOh
Apr 17, 2004, 3:42 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

5 Digit/Buckeye 5Reply
RJOh -Is it possible that the number of combinations excluding 01 through 10 and 28 through 37 should read 6188 rather than 4368? Basically, what that does is create a 5/17 lottery draw, of which there are 6188 possibilities. It doesn't significantly alter the substance of youir post, though.....gljohn
Apr 16, 2004, 5:59 pm - johnph77 - Pick 5 Forum

How does one use statistics to help win?Reply
Perhaps, you are going to have to choose parameters that limit your numbers and combinations and accept the fact that within those parameters your chances of hitting the big one will only exist 20% or less of the time, but when a chance exits, you will have covered most of the possibilities.RJOh
Apr 16, 2004, 1:22 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

5 Digit/Buckeye 5Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on April 15, 2004Mr Steel,Your theory is a fact. In the Buckeye5 (5/37) game, there are 435,897 possible combinations and 355,167 of them start with numbers 1-10, that 81% of the possible combinations. Like wise 81% also end with numbers 26-37. Only 4,368 combinations(11-25) or 1% of those combinations would not have either of those conditions.RJOhDon't you mean 19 % Roy?
Apr 16, 2004, 10:43 am - MrSteel01 - Pick 5 Forum

5 Digit/Buckeye 5Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on April 15, 2004Mr Steel,Your theory is a fact. In the Buckeye5 (5/37) game, there are 435,897 possible combinations and 355,167 of them start with numbers 1-10, that 81% of the possible combinations. Like wise 81% also end with numbers 26-37. Only 4,368 combinations(11-25) or 1% of those combinations would not have either of those conditions.RJOhTHANK YOU MR ROY!
Apr 16, 2004, 10:20 am - MrSteel01 - Pick 5 Forum

5 Digit/Buckeye 5Reply
Mr Steel,Your theory is a fact. In the Buckeye5 (5/37) game, there are 435,897 possible combinations and 355,167 of them start with numbers 1-10, that 81% of the possible combinations. Like wise 81% also end with numbers 26-37. Only 4,368 combinations(11-25) or 1% of those combinations would not have either of those conditions.RJOh
Apr 15, 2004, 3:16 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

Elderly Woman Loses $10,000 In Lottery ScamReply
How do these scammers find these old people with $10K to give to someone? Do they wear a sign I old, I got $10K I can get my hands on fast, just ask me .RJOh
Apr 14, 2004, 9:46 am - RJOh - Lottery News

powerball odds 2Reply
Quote: Originally posted by hot lotto on April 13, 2004Where I come from is least important and I would not be willing to let people know who I am and where I am from.Your foolish talk will always tell people who your are. It's like a finger print.RJOh
Apr 14, 2004, 7:13 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?Reply
Paul,A full wheel would be 210 lines, so you are saying he was hoping to reduce the odds to 1:4200 with 20 tries which is still expecting a lot. I think it was have been more realistic to expect to reduce the odds such that smaller prizes would be won more often if not a jackpot prize.RJOh
Apr 13, 2004, 3:30 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum