Search

dull lotto newsReply
Quote: Originally posted by Mana on February 25, 2004 of course you always got the soap opera known as the Young and Jack Whittaker. *giggle* Jack's mistake was to say publicly that he wished to share his winnings with the poor. I don't think any other lottery winner will ever repeat that mistake.RJOh
Feb 25, 2004, 3:34 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

MM for Tuesday 2/24/04Reply
Six numbers and a buck could make you a multi-millionaire. I've decided to take a break and try it with Ohio649P this week since its jackpot is the same size as MegaMillions and the odds of matching all six numbers are almost 10 times better. Good luck fja, I'll be playing MM when its jackpot gets a little bigger which shouldn't take long with the help of Texas and New York.RJOh
Feb 24, 2004, 2:12 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

PB Drawing's...Reply
RJOH:You're right... I just checked the $ amount. We'll see how my test goes. If it looks good at this drawing, I probably will play a few lines Saturday. Good luck to you also.Chief
Feb 23, 2004, 6:12 pm - kbcherokee - Jackpot Games Forum

MM Results: 01-13-20-21-30 +24Reply
Quote: Originally posted by fja on February 23, 2004The winning combination 1,13,20,21,30 mb 24. has had virtually no history. Maybe history doesn't mean much since all those numbers have been in the mix from the very beginning.RJOh
Feb 23, 2004, 5:33 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Ohio Super Lotto 02/25/04...$10M
Now that Ohio Super Lotto (odds=1:13,983,816) and MegaMillions(odds=1:135,145,920) have the same jackpot size, Ohio Super Lotto is looking good again.Good luck Ohio players.RJOh
Feb 23, 2004, 11:28 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

PB vs MMReply
Your odds of winning is a set number regardless of the number of players. If you are the only player and you don't have the winning numbers then you lose. The odds are that more players will produce more winners, but that old saying that playing numbers below 32 makes it more likely that a winner with those numbers will have to share the prize seems not to be true. I think any of the losers wouldn't have mind sharing a $230M prize.RJOh
Feb 22, 2004, 11:26 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

PB vs MMReply
Also with all the additional players, players who only play when the jackpot is over $100M will not have to wait as long, which should make the game attractive to more players more often. RJOh
Feb 22, 2004, 11:00 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

knowing there's a winner before the drawReply
Passion,That was an interesting story, but I'm sure you weren't the only one watching that show and had it gone down as you said, some other viewers would have ask that question. I think you can put that story in the urban legends category.RJOh
Feb 22, 2004, 6:15 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

MM Results: 01-13-20-21-30 +24Reply
I played 52 lines that included all the mega balls, so I knew I would get back at least $2. I also got a match 3, so if the jackpot rolls over I plan to do the same thing again.RJOh
Feb 20, 2004, 10:04 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Predicting Patterns MMReply
Probably it's good for publicity to have one of the biggest jackpot drawing in Time Square and if it gets real big they will have the drawing in Texas where they do everything real big.RJOh
Feb 20, 2004, 12:01 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum