Search

Judge awards excluded worker $1 million share of Big Game jackpotReply
A reverse of this case happened a few years ago in Youngstown,Ohio. A pool of workers won the jackpot shortly after a new worker joined and the older pool members thought the new member should only receive a partial share since he had not lost as much as they had during previous drawings but he went to court and the judge ruled that if winnings from previous drawings weren't used to buy the winning ticket then they had no effect on how the jackpot was distributed unless such an agreement was ma
Feb 14, 2004, 12:14 am - RJOh - Lottery News

MM $150 million for next fridayReply
I don't need the money any more than I need the $10+ I will be spending on lottery tickets, but I would like to win too. Good luck to all who can afford to play.RJOh
Feb 13, 2004, 11:05 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

MegaMillions..$120MReply
With 52 numbers in the pool, you could spend $10 and only cover 50 numbers so wheeling is not going to help you if you are trying to cover each number at least once.RJOh
Feb 13, 2004, 11:01 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Surveyr on New Lotto SystemReply
At the old Maybelle site, there was a guy by the name of Lucky Ducky that posted a fixed list of pick3 numbers that have 6-12 hits a day somewhere in the country. He said it was magic, but he really was just matching the odds(1/220) of having a boxed hit with over 45 mid-day and evening drawings every day.RJOh
Feb 13, 2004, 10:17 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Judge awards excluded worker $1 million share of Big Game jackpotReply
Chances are if the pool had not won anything she wouldn't have paid later for the losing tickets unless an agreement of such was made earlier. Obvisously the judge was one of those persons that think that lotteries winnings is free money that should be shared with everyone who knows the winners even if they don't share the cost of the winning tickets, hopefully when the case is appealed they will have a judge that understand that lottery winnings are not free if you have to buy the winning tic
Feb 13, 2004, 10:03 am - RJOh - Lottery News

How is it possible?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Fwup on February 12, 2004 So, the reason you waste your time with systems is because you don't understand that SOMEONE has to win, but spending several thousand dollars on a lottery system isn't going to improve your chances any more than someone using common sense, because it's RANDOM! Using common sense to pick your numbers is a system and shouldn't cost several thousand dollars. Making sure you don't play the same combination more than once per drawing is a system
Feb 12, 2004, 7:37 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

How does Powerball calculate their odds?Reply
There are 120,526,770 possible combinations and of the 3,442,046 winning combinations 1,712,304 will have the PowerBall and none of the other winning numbers.1,712,304 /120,526,770 = 1/70 odds of hitting only PowerBall3,442,046/120,526,770 = 1/36 the overall odds of having a ticket that wins something.only one jackpot winning combination = 1/120,526,770 = odds of winning jackpot.RJOh
Feb 12, 2004, 7:19 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Opinions on this new program?Reply
Your are right, if you are winning nothing, winning 500% more is still nothing. That's basic, no need to pay to learn that.RJOh
Feb 12, 2004, 2:27 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Surveyr on New Lotto SystemReply
If you play enough lines that contain all the numbers at least once, all the winning numbers will show up but if they are not on the same line, you will win nothing. People do that all the time and lose, so why would they add another $50/month to their lost?RJOh
Feb 12, 2004, 11:27 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

WheelingReply
If you use the same wheel and place the same numbers in different positions in the wheel, the coverage is the same but the results may be different because difference numbers appear more often than others. When wheeling numbers you may prefer to put your favorite numbers in the positions that occur more often.RJOh
Feb 12, 2004, 11:03 am - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum