Search

Urgent!!
This is not a joke!!!Repeat this is not a joke!!!! Awhile back I posted a link in this discussion group under the topic Believe or Not . Basically it was a link to a website to an individual called Aaron Donahue who it was claimed that for about a week correctly predicted the winning Pick 3 numbers in Michigan. While the article was interesting, like anyone who read it, I'm sure had to be highly skeptical. Well for the past week Aaron and his sister Jennifer have been predicting the correct P
Dec 3, 2003, 9:38 pm - dynodyno - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery programsReply
Quote: Originally posted by Thomas Covenant on September 14, 2003 I read a news article a very long time ago about a man that figure out one of the canadian lotteries and made a bundle. The lottery sued him, but it was thrown out of court. And before anyone has a hissy fit about being able to predict the lottery, the draws were picked by a RNG in a computer and there was a mistake in the code. And no, he didn't share. are you referring to the Montreal man [i think a math teacher] who used chao
Nov 23, 2003, 7:55 pm - vick - Lottery Systems Forum

Numeric frequency theories do not applyReply
EXCALIBUR, we say exactly the same thing! Actually, anyone here says the same thing in different words.About the formulas, this is like asking me to write a technical article on this, which I'll not. There a lot steps involved in this, it's not just a simple equation. Anyone who has an understanding of statistics, confidence intervals, normal distribution, degrees of freedom, sample size properties etc, can realize the problem we are dealing with. It's differe t to observe a possible dvent than
Nov 23, 2003, 9:26 am - lottoarchitect - Lottery Systems Forum

Whatever happened to? Very Strange!Reply
I wish I could remember, around that time, my computer went kaput, so I was not accessing a computer regularly. By the time I got a new one, the posting from the newsgroup was gone. I have made inquiries to the newsgroups, but no luck so far. He was in England and his name I believe was ALI(middle eastern). I regret not saving the info somewhere. He could have been a scammer, but the news article and some of his conclusions do lead me to believe he may be on to something. He made some interest
Oct 25, 2003, 7:23 pm - dynodyno - Lottery Discussion Forum

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
After just a little while of very rudimentary preliminary research on the subject of the original post in this thread... I can see this taking a LONG time to work out. As with all herculean tasks, some presuppositions are mandatory... the notion that ANYTHING is absolutely random must be tossed aside. If you can't shake that concept, try This article as a primer... I'm not advocating taking guru's word for it, but I'm inclined to agree with Einstein and Fenyman...Also, you need a clearly defined
Sep 22, 2003, 5:56 pm - hypersoniq - Lottery Systems Forum

A Winning Lottery System Does Exist!!
It was created by Everett Barker in Abingdon,VA in the early 90's and was used for 4 yrs winning CONSISTANTLYby hitting 3-5 numbers in the Virginia Lottery.He finally hit all 6 numbers on Jan.2,1996 winning $3 million dollars.He missed winning the jackpot in 1994 by forgetting to play his numbers no one hit that night so had he played he would have walked away with $2.5 million dollars only spending $1 (no quick-pick either)When Virginia first enacted it's Lottery Everett decided to find a way t
Sep 17, 2003, 3:56 pm - Pick-4_Master - Lottery Systems Forum

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
thanks thomsol!here's what I found so far... (courtesy of wild billy gates and the staff at Microsoft...)Microsoft Visual Basic uses the linear-congruential method for pseudo-random number generation in the RND function. The following pseudo code documents the algorithm used:x1 = ( x0 * a + c ) MOD (2^24)where:x1 = new valuex0 = previous value (an initial value of 327680 is used by Visual Basic)a = 1140671485c = 12820163The 'MOD' operator in the formula above returns the integer remainder after
Sep 15, 2003, 2:00 pm - hypersoniq - Lottery Systems Forum

California's 91 Million Dollar Winner
Today I picked up a copy of Lotto People magazine. Interesting article on Patricia Frierson; who won the Ca SuperLotto August 9. Thought I would share a little of the info; as we often wonder if they took the cash and if it was qps or their own numbers.She was a 55 year old widow living in a motel. She was actually waiting for escrow to close on her new town house. Worked 23 years in a chemical processing plant.Using a combination of the same numbers she always bets; she bought five plays- one e
Sep 8, 2003, 5:27 pm - Calscorp - Jackpot Games Forum

A must read and Cash didn't write itReply
I think you have to think of the lump sum as THE jackpot; the annuity is a bit of an illusion to make the real jackpot seem bigger and sell more tickets. The annuity is the state investing the jackpot for you. If you took the lump sum, presumably you would be investing a lot of it too, but after having paid 40+% in taxes and expenses. It's actually hard to know what to take, because having the state invest the money for you may pay better, but you never know what the future may hold and 25 yea
Jul 18, 2003, 8:03 am - tg636 - Lottery Discussion Forum

A must read and Cash didn't write itReply
This article answers the question I always had: what percentage interest or return would you need on the lump sum to equal or surpass the jackpot? It's currently 7.8%, because of another fact that doesn't get noted much. The lottery's annuity is invested with no taxes taken out; any investment a winner makes on the lump sum is already minus 35% from federal tax, and 5% more from state tax (in MA, where I live) before they've invested the first dollar. That's a lot of ground to make up just to ge
Jul 17, 2003, 12:55 pm - tg636 - Lottery Discussion Forum