Search

Possible Lottosync V1.8 Xmas Release?Reply
Paul, I cannot do what you ask... If you knew how many hours I've spent developing the mathematical model for lottosync, you would surely understand why I don't want to make this an open source thing. While you are sleeping... I am thinking... trying... retrying... creating... endlessly. This may seem selfish or greedy, but you probably worked hard for some things you own too. Would you really be prepared to give away your car... or the house you live in ? I have invested all m
Dec 28, 2006, 3:50 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

Another scam?Reply
Perhaps Paul Connor has found out how Lottosync works. Marco's website is still up. Is it two years since the last update to 1.7?
Dec 6, 2006, 4:48 pm - MillionsWanted - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottosync - remeber these words Marco ?Reply
Lottosync has seen it best days, time to move on to something better. Good luck.
Apr 25, 2006, 8:52 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Marco, is this where you live?Reply
Go to http://www.hoaxland.be/roadmap/ and in the left side picture you can see Marco hard at work on Lottosync v1.8. Escondido, CA John
Mar 5, 2006, 7:55 am - hosni - Lottery Systems Forum

a "tested version" for pick 3Reply
Yes, Harmen (Stoopendaal) did a great job with it, not exactly as I wanted, but a great job anyway, it was sort of a joint effort, but he did all the programming, since I can't, but did give him plenty of filters ideas, he also implemented his ideas and some of Pick 4 Master's. It was a triple effort, kind of, he being the only programmer. Too bad that he is a very very busy person and farther development is in check. Kind of like LottoSync.
Feb 5, 2006, 1:15 am - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

on ways of improving 1.lottosync idea!!Reply
MarcoDidn't or doesn't yet understand, that his random discoveries while very good are only a part of the puzzle to get the winning number with and not the whole answer to it, his system as it is now or as it was on 1.5 to 1.7 can only be partially effective. Getting 2 numbers out of 10 is not such a great thing, 3 numbers out of ten is not too bad, but still not good enough as 3 numbers don't pay much or anything at all, 3 numbers + powerball or 4 main numbers, that would really be something.Wh
Nov 21, 2005, 5:55 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

Daily LotteryReply
I can't speak for Todd and won't try to. What I can say is one draws a fine line between what you allow for the purposes of discussion and people just trying to make a buck off your visitors while giving nothing in return.For example, Lottosync and Lotto Architect virtually were developed right here on LotteryPost. Others like Lotto-Pro, Gail Howard and Steve Player are such fixtures in the lottery industry to ban their names would stifle discussion. Some sites like Lotto-Logix link to Lotter
Oct 13, 2005, 12:46 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

LottoSync needs cloning + development.Reply
xavier,I haven't used or bought the software but if as you say, it's not any great feat of coding or a great prediction engine in any sense of the word, why have there been so many reports of it taking a day or longer to come up with its picks? Unless it goes into some kind of time delay loop, it must be crunching numbers or doing something because just using the last three drawings would limit its pool to 15-18 numbers and it's unlikely its picks from those numbers for a 6/49 game is going to
Sep 2, 2005, 6:10 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

LottoSync needs cloning + development.Reply
Why should anyone treat him or his system/software better? He's been leading everyone on about how good his new versions predicting is for over a year. Says he wants to make it better/faster, etc. The fact is that he has nothing and it doesn't work like he's been leading everyone on about. If you check out the topic below, I believe I've already shown everyone what he is doing with his software. It's not any great feat of coding or a great prediction engine in any sense of the word. To sum
Sep 2, 2005, 4:52 pm - xavier102772 - Lottery Systems Forum

LottoSync needs cloning + development.Reply
Lottosync is not dead !!I am still working on the new version. I have so much new information I would like to share with you on the forum, but I decided not to do so yet.I want to keep working on the system quietly at my own pace. I sometimes need to leave it for a while to clear my mind.The big deal is not writing the software, the big deal is continuously finding out how it can be made better (and faster). This requires good ideas (wich need constant evaluation on their validity). I'm not jus
Aug 23, 2005, 3:27 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum