Search

Looking for the ultimate wheelReply
I reread your post. Would you looking for both a pick6 and pick4 wheel? Those wheels might take a little longer.RJOh
Oct 27, 2003, 8:49 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

10 Million What Would You Do?Reply
RJOH:You're probably right but I still would do what I have vowed to do. You have to consider the source too. Mr. Jack W. Maybe the reason he has shut down his Foundation is that he's lost his 'VISION from spending too much time in Topless Bars... LOLThanks for you're input though.Chief
Oct 27, 2003, 1:39 pm - kbcherokee - Lottery Discussion Forum

10 Million What Would You Do?Reply
Chief,According to this article, it not easy to be charitable.http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/national/article/0,1406,KNS_350_2365609,00.htmlI think it would be easier to just spend your winnings on yourself and family.RJOh
Oct 27, 2003, 1:21 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

pick 5 any work outsReply
luckycat,I'll take your word, you tested Power pick 5 and found it worthless, that good enough for me. The odds of matching two is 1:8 and I usually do it in 1:5, no need to test another RNG when mine works fine.RJOh
Oct 27, 2003, 10:40 am - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

pick 5 any work outsReply
Sorry if you thought I was implying that you were stupid. My point was at best a system is lucky to pick 4 or more winning numbers of 5 in a month to a year and trying it out on paper and waiting until after a drawing to see if it did is unproductive because if it does, it not likely to do it again soon, so you have miss your chance. Besides if it only requires numbers from the last three drawings it not likely another person would have any better results.RJOh
Oct 27, 2003, 2:15 am - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

pick 5 any work outsReply
Sounds like you better get busy. Even if it does pick some winners, it will to late to play them after they are drawn. Hope you trial period go well.Good luck to you,RJOh
Oct 26, 2003, 11:56 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

Wheels - Pick 7 from 27Reply
The problem with wheels that use all the numbers in the pool is if you don't win the jackpot the prizes are usually about 1-2% of the cost to play. Using a smaller pool of numbers that you think may include the winning numbers will result in a smaller lost even if you win no prize.RJOh
Oct 26, 2003, 9:38 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lotto Sync test II retryReply
LottoCheata had a similar test a year ago where he picked ~300 lines for a PowerBall drawing with his program against ~300 lines picked by a RNG and the RNG's numbers won. He explained that his program was bias to pick a winning number within a small range and could not in a short run compete with a RNG that picked all sort of numbers over a larger range. I suspect that Guru program would do no better since he hasn't prove that a particular seed number is better than any other seed when using
Oct 25, 2003, 10:44 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Lotto Sync test II retryReply
$100 for RNG even if it does have a special seed is a lot of $. I would think one could program a regular RNG in a loop to pick 10 numbers and when ever a set of 10 have 4 or more numbers from the last draws loop one more time and print out the last loop.RJOh
Oct 25, 2003, 9:46 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

wow powerball now at 190Reply
There were two jackpot winners. I played my numbers for two draws, so I'll save my tickets until late December or early January when the jackpot is over $100M again and make another road trip.RJOh
Oct 25, 2003, 9:30 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum