Search

LottosyncReply
We are thinking about also releasing a less expensive version of Lottosync 1.8A version (all features included) where you can buy prediction credits. This would allow you to try the software for X number of times for a fairly low price tag. When your credits are all used, you can decide to leave it at that or buy new credits. Or ultimatly you can decide buying the unlimited version (at the current price) wich also includes unlimited future upgrades for free.Our current customers would ofcourse r
Oct 5, 2004, 9:12 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottosync 1.8 Scatterplot screenshotReply
trance:It's not error revolution but evolution.It shows the attraction towards a number (horizontal X-axis) at certain points of error in the calculation (vertical Y-axis)The lower the points on the plot go on the vertical axis, the lower the error. (thus the more we can trust the horizontal value)Basicly, the process starts off at a bigger error value and then refines to lower the error in the calculation.At the end of the process Lottosync will look at the results of the lowest error points fr
Sep 25, 2004, 9:25 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

Guru V1.8- sep,oct,nov,dec,jan??Reply
Am also thinking about physical characteristics of the random dvent such as the individual speed of the balls or numbers and the time in between each ball and or number, but these apply and might be factors to or for the actual lottery draws, but they might have nothing to do with the way LottoSync gets the numbers, but for an actual physical reproduction of the particular random dvent thay would be important, also spin of the balls if any.You are trying to reproduce a physical dvent in a virtu
Sep 15, 2004, 1:03 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

Guru V1.8- sep,oct,nov,dec,jan??Reply
Paul:Lottosync does not just look at those last 3 draws and do some hocus pocus pattern analysis with the few numbers in it. (that would only take a nanosecond to compute).No, it forces a random flow into the state of the last three draws. It analyses patterns in the data it generates and compares this to the state your lottery game is in. It really takes billions of tries to come to a satisfactory similarity between the generated data and the actual lotto results.It takes billions of tries beca
Sep 14, 2004, 8:51 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottosync 1.8 Free predictions newsletterReply
cleary there is interest for this.looks like an awfull lot of different lotteries are being requested. It will be difficult to satisfy everyone with this newsletter.maybe lantern is right. maybe I should release a minimalized version of lottosync for free on the web that shows you the 3 most likely numbers for instance. I'm not sure. We've never been keen on giving away demo versions or sort of that, but maybe a version that just predicts 3 numbers would be a good thing. This way it's still only
Jul 30, 2004, 2:57 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottosync 1.8 engine odds reportReply
Paul:I have to be a bit carefull with the statistics for 5 and 6 matches. It requires testing over multiple years to get a reliable estimation of the chances.Currently we are doing an experiment with 14 predicted numbers filtered into only 25 to 35 6number combinations.The current result of this experiment for my 6/42 lotto is that it lands me aprox every 7 draws at least 1 4hit from those filtered combinations. (Considering an average of 30 combinations played per draw from 14 predicted numbers
Jul 12, 2004, 10:30 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

Lottery Director slightly ahead!!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on July 08, 2004LANTERN - I'm giong to see how the new lottosync V1.8 performs, and if it's no better than my own selections I'll forget about lotto software. got 3 from 6 last night + 4 from 7 two nights before, this from the minimum 6 + 7 numbers, GH=2 numbers and LD=2 numbers, they also hit 1 number each the two nights before, these were using 8 numbers not 6 + 7.good luck.Forget Gail Howard predictions. Using about 200 past draws F3 set F4 clear V chart t
Jul 9, 2004, 2:22 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

Winhunter : AI - What she thinks?Reply
I think that maybe andrew should write a book and or a big document manual for Winhunter, also monthly newsletters, with tips, hints, instructions and advice and maybe should train trainers or something like that, but at least a short book or long very detailed manual with lots and lots of examples for everything from the ground up, like one of does Stupid Books or All that you ever wanted to know books or whatever they are called.Very detailed instructions from the beginning to the end with m
Jul 2, 2004, 9:04 am - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

Mathematical SequencesReply
Quote: Originally posted by ayenowitall on May 08, 2004RJ,Some years ago when I first started playing the lottery, I tried selecting numbers based on the historical parameters for each position. I had no trouble coming up with numbers, but I never had any success with cashing tickets. I hope you can manage to do better than I did. Good luck.BTW, I read through all the posts of a thread about the Lottosync system. It looks like there are quite a few unhappy campers out there. I sure hope Guru did
Jun 11, 2004, 1:53 am - MrSteel01 - Mathematics Forum

LS 1.8 screenshotReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on June 06, 2004Sounds like Lottosynchronizer is evolving into a more traditional lottery program that uses the past histories and the most recent trends of the drawings to make its predictions than a theory of randomness that was the bases of its beginning. Does this mean it will work faster also?RJOhNo, it is not evolving into a more traditional lottery program. The theory behind it is still unchanged, the only thing that has changed is that the soft now takes
Jun 6, 2004, 12:46 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum