Search

Louisiana: 6/1 - 6/30/2013Reply
ERROR CORRECTION 763 TTT 7 7 6 2 2 1 9 6 8 4 1 3 1 3 0 6 8 5 9 7 8 4 2 3 1 6 0 6 1 5 3 3 2 8 8 7
Jun 10, 2013, 3:14 pm - teresa56 - Pick 3 Forum

649 formulaReply
I usually ignore your postings (certainly in this thread) as a waste of hot air. But I suppose that nonsensical remark deserves a response, even though it reflects more on your character than on mine. I posted the following at https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/262010/3100463 on June 5: ``Actually, that demonstrates that neither of my passes is correct. I'll have to look for a programming error later. [....] Sorry for the misdirection.`` Moreover, I did not say that __I__ answered Gwoof's
Jun 9, 2013, 6:42 pm - mathhead - Mathematics Forum

649 formulaReply
RJOh wrote: ``For anyone who's interested, 958 completed cycles of 49 numbers appearing could be counted in the 997 drawings of Ohio Classic Lotto that varies from 19 to 65 drawings.`` And that is consistent with my analysis of the 31-year(!) data for the Canada 6/49 lotto: 19 to 64 drawings for all 49 numbers to appear in the first 6 numbers (not considering the bonus number), with a mean of 36 +/-2 rounded (with 95% confidence). FYI, Gwoof, when the bonus number is included (i.e. a draw
Jun 5, 2013, 7:06 pm - mathhead - Mathematics Forum

Should a winning system be posted on the LP?Reply
I have a friend who bought several of his so called systems not just the cheap low end systems but 6 of the high end systems $150 plus range . All have failed at producing any Wins even minimum return on investment . Just 1 of many bad reviews : In the fall of 1999 S.Player mailed out a new system for Play 3. It was illustrated with a graph based on a simple formula. But in his new catalogue he usd a different graph for identically same draw data. When asked by letter for an explanation
May 15, 2013, 8:16 pm - CajunWin4 - Lottery Systems Forum

California - Highway Robbery in ProgressReply
Extrapolating the figues for Powerball in my previous post.. $1,430,032 short fall for winners x 104 draws per year= $14,872,332 annually First, if you were right about how it will work out, the shortfall would be $104 million, not 14 million. The problem is that besides making the simple arithmetic error, you don't understand the probability that the lottery relies on, or even how the number of winners varies from drawing to drawing. You started by assuming that there will be 2
Apr 25, 2013, 11:50 pm - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum

algorithmosReply
Hello, sergem, the first goal is to see a good number of patterns of each lottery (the lottery are the same too), and then filter to avoid conflict in the parameters of the filters So is seeing little drawings within the matrix of the lottery, because if a particular pattern (a figure) is 100%, just an error in the parameter of the filter (a filter wrong) that the bet goes wrong, then we must first discover patterns. If mathematically you could only get to a certain point in the lottery, t
Apr 12, 2013, 10:55 am - dr san - Lottery Systems Forum

Heads up on Texas All or Nothing Promotion playing $6 or more on Texas Lotto gameReply
Couldn't agree more rcbbuckeye ... not going to spend the $6. I enjoy the Lotto Texas game over the Mega Millions and Powerball. No bonus ball to mess with. I play about $5 a week with my own numbers. And I admit that the All or Nothing game has caught my attention. Still learning strategies on that one. I'd bite on the promotion if they didn't make it more difficult for playslip players. I'm not going to hold up a line of people so the cashier can manually enter numbers. That's craz
Jan 10, 2013, 4:19 pm - brittkimsdad - Lottery Discussion Forum

SpecialReply
Noticed a coloring error on 276, it should be colored as sums 5 not sums 6. TN SMD Sums 0 due for 33 draws Sums 9 due for 24 draws 047 039 067 077 176 276 007 647 016 017 009 937 037
Jan 5, 2013, 2:46 pm - CASH34OLOGIST - Pick 3 Forum

Washington Lottery published wrong numbers after raffle drawReply
Every now and then I consider that a winning lottery ticket might be an error in some way. I dont keep mine in a shoebox but I do hold it in the recycle bin for a little while. I also remind my self that when I do win, I will check multiple sites to ensure they all show the same result. However, with a state raffle, you dont really have many options other than the 1 site, which makes this one harder to take. I am thinking these lottery folks should try to seek out the winners, via store
Jan 5, 2013, 10:31 am - TheOtherOne - Lottery News

Washington Lottery published wrong numbers after raffle drawReply
We've gotten used to a lot of things that used to piss us off. We've been kinda conditioned to expect gross negligence and incompetence at the fast food drive-up window. And mailmen not being able to distinguish between one address and another when they deliver the mail. And libs having vehicles backed up for a mile behind them as they drive slow in the passing lane. But this... publishing the wrong numbers and saying you're going to call in an auditing firm to make sure you don't s
Jan 3, 2013, 10:48 pm - rdgrnr - Lottery News