- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 10:05 pm
You last visited
June 7, 2026, 2:27 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
LS 1.8 screenshot
Paul:1.8 Will still mainly use the last 3 draws. But the new prediction routine will also track things in the past 30 to 50 draws. We found a missing key in the older prediction method we used.I know that we always said that the last 3 results are enough to make a very decent prediction. Now we'll have to change that to the most important 3 draws. It seems that some very valuable clues are further away in the draw history.This new insight makes the new lottosync predictions unmistakably better
Jun 6, 2004, 10:00 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum
LS 1.8 Feature list
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on May 13, 2004Lantern,Any 20 number list will have 3 or more of the winning numbers of a 6/49 game 50% of the time and 4 or more 20% of the time, just make up a list and check it against the history of any 6/49 game. If a program doesn't do any better than it just picking 20 random numbers.RJOhIndeed !! Any 20 number set will very often match 3 or 4 of the winning numbers.But 20 number sets also produce overwhelmingly large (expensive) wheels if you want some s
May 13, 2004, 12:27 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum
Lottosync v1.7 bug report !
Oh! By the way, 10 balls might be too many for games that have 4 and 5 main balls, maybe for a game with 4 main balls 6 or 7 predicted balls might be best.And for a game with 5 main balls, 8 predicted balls might be about right, I think that the number of balls per position that the game has, would have a lot to do with this, for example: A 5-54 game might need more predicted balls or numbers than a 5-37 game.I said 5-54 because LottoSync would not work on the bonus ball for this game, so basica
May 10, 2004, 11:17 am - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum
Mathematical Sequences
RJ,Some years ago when I first started playing the lottery, I tried selecting numbers based on the historical parameters for each position. I had no trouble coming up with numbers, but I never had any success with cashing tickets. I hope you can manage to do better than I did. Good luck.BTW, I read through all the posts of a thread about the Lottosync system. It looks like there are quite a few unhappy campers out there. I sure hope Guru didn't market the same thing I'm developing. I'll not call
May 8, 2004, 12:25 am - ayenowitall - Mathematics Forum
LottoSync Users - Tried This NEW Idea?!
Quote: Originally posted by vick on April 25, 2004you can only input 3 draws, not moreYes, I know. What I meant here was, take FOUR fresh draws, make them into FOUR sets of THREE draws each. Next have each set tested by a different person (LottoSync user) at a mutually agreed sampling rate and time frame. Next have ALL of them post their results on this forum for further observation/discussion/innovation. Because we will have four daughter sets together from the SAME parent sets, not only we can
Apr 27, 2004, 1:41 am - DreamLotto - Lottery Systems Forum
something wrong with lottosync v1.6 ?
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on April 25, 2004Paul, After reading the posts of other LottoSync users, I think the program is doing what it was designed to do - take over 12 hours to generate 10 numbers. It's just that you think that 10 random numbers generated in 12 or more hours should be better than 10 numbers pulled out a hat.RJOh RHOh: Just for fun do you think it would help or hurt to have let's say six hats each containing the numbers normally drawn within the six positional ranges. D
Apr 26, 2004, 2:49 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum
Lottosynchronizer 1.6
when i hit 5/7 i played multiple samples of 27 after 150 eg. 162 was my first sample 189 was my second sample, 216 my third, after i had finished, my last sample was 1998 and out of all the tickets only 1 line had the 5 numbers. when i used that same sample for the next draw it produced 0, so my thoughts are now stick with the one sample and play, i think guru said there were certain hotspots in the lottery where lottosync will perform best, but i also think this is from sticking to one sample.
Apr 6, 2004, 5:28 am - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
Lottosynchronizer 1.6
If the cost of the included Lottosync wheel is keeping you from playing, here is my 10 number wheel in 10 lines that guarantees 3if3, 4-3if4, 4if5+8-3if5 and 6-4if6+4-3if6 prizes with an 84% chance of 5if6. 1 2 3 5 7 8 1 2 4 5 7 9 1 2 4 6 8 10 1 2 5 6 7 10 1 3 4 5 6 9 1 3 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 6 7 9 2 3 5 8 9 10 3 4 6 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 10If 10 lines is beyond budget, the following three lines will guarantee 2-3if5 and 4if6+2-3if6 with a 97% chance of 3if4. 1
Apr 4, 2004, 10:26 pm - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum
any wheeling software that........
Dear Paul,Guru's Lotto Synchronizer incorporates (probably all of) Dr. Illya Bluskov's wheels, as found from the pictures of LottoSync on his website. A couple of his great wheel samples are to be found at: http://www3.telus.net/lotbook/node7.html and http://www3.telus.net/lotbook/node19.html What you can do is: Incorporate them in Windows Lotto Pro by going to >File>New-Wheeling System and fill and save the template therein to get the wheel working from inside Lotto Pro!! If you can affor
Apr 3, 2004, 3:01 am - DreamLotto - Lottery Systems Forum
HEY GURU
the truth is the program shouldnt have been offered to anyone in the first place if it was incomplete to start with. you dont buy half a car and then upgrade to the other half because the back wheels werent ready yet ,they wait until its ready then sell it. i bought lottosync without knowing it didnt select repeat numbers from the last draw, that wasnt mentioned on the website was it? i wish i had not been taken in by the 80% 3 number win promise and i had waited until definite results were comi
Mar 4, 2004, 6:26 am - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum
