Search

HEY GURUReply
PaulWe all want the upgrade, but do you want a piece of trash?Or do you want a properly finished program, one that might do better than the one that we have right now.Yes, we all are impatient, believe me, but that does not mean that I want to get an upgrade that is no better than the one that we have right now and I don't mean to say the LottoSync 1.6 is bad, after all some people have gotten some good numbers with it and some very often, do you know of any other programs or ways that are that
Mar 4, 2004, 3:49 am - EXCALIBUR - Lottery Systems Forum

lottosync hot/cold times!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by luckycat on February 15, 2004 reddog:have not seen any recent posts,I have been ill recently not on net too much, however, wondered if you ever got even 1 win with the sync.???? thanks for you feedback. wish you well.I stopped posting the numbers that I was getting from Lottosync hoping I wasn't jinxing my luck. Didn't help. Like I said , I'm down around $200 so far in the month and a half that I have had the program. I need 1.8 version and 1.7 still hasn't came out
Feb 15, 2004, 2:25 pm - reddog - Lottery Systems Forum

LottoSync v1.7 issues !!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on February 10, 2004 if i had randomly chosen 69 sets of 7 numbers i would probably have had the same if not better results in a fraction of the time.You are misjudging your game Paul. If you had randomly chosen 69 sets of 7 numbers they would almost certainly not have produced a 5 win. These are some figures to illustrate why !!Your game with 27 balls has a total amount of 80730 possible 5 number combinationsEach set of 7 numbers can only mathematically cover
Feb 10, 2004, 6:19 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

LottoSync v1.7 issues !!Reply
Hypersoniq:First of all, speed depends on how you obtain your random numbers. A prng is fast in spitting out random numbers , but not good enough.Lottosync doesn't use just a prng. + all numbers have to be constantly reordered in a certain way to obtain more or less reliable number strings. Chaotic systems do not move on in a linear way like 1 2 3 4 5 6. they rather move like 1 4 3 6 5 2.The linear movement has to be projected against the numbers that where drawn in the last draws. They conta
Feb 5, 2004, 6:39 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

LottoSync v1.7 issues !!Reply
Caveat Emptor ... holds true in lotto also, or maybe 'especially in lotto'.The way I see it nobody is forcing anyone to buy the system, if anything Guru has shown restraint in that respect in my opinion. He's openly discussing his progress in improving the program if not revealing the nitty gritty of the engine itself (that part would probably be beyond comprehension of lot of ppl here, self included). Compare that to others who have shamelessly tried to flog systems that are known not to work a
Feb 5, 2004, 6:04 pm - lottoshlep - Lottery Systems Forum

canada 6/49 prediction!!Reply
I would really appreciate you still posting the numbers. In regards to the other Canadians using Lottosync and posting their numbers(eg. Vick and Underdog), although they haven't hit that often, I've noticed that often the numbers they post are often only a couple numbers away. For example, let's say the 10 numbers you predict for a draw are 3, 7, 12, 14, 25, 28, 32, 35, 37, 45. Often I find that the winning six numbers are VERY close, eg something like 6, 11,15, 24, 27,33. Obviously, not alwa
Jan 10, 2004, 11:54 am - dynodyno - Lottery Systems Forum

could this be conspiracy??Reply
thats what i thought thats why i dont play the bc/49 and stick with the national because i feel the computer can be adjusted to perform slightly less than random and a drum machine with balls can be tampered with but it would have to be the balls and they are checked frequently i believe every draw they do a preliminary draw before doing an actual draw!!! anyway i'am running my lottosync right now for the next can 6/49 draw with samples set at 650 it should be done by tomrrow night lol!!!! [pe
Jan 7, 2004, 9:40 pm - underdog - Lottery Systems Forum

Acculotto & Lotto CheetahReply
Ants:I think our customers can testify that we do give a lot of support (we answer all questions individually). We do care about the people playing with our system and are truly pleased to see people win with it.If you are concerned about the money I earn with the sales, I can tell you it doesn't even cover 1/50 of the development costs. I'm sure you are paid better for the job you are doing. If we would have to live only from the lottosync sales, we would already be starved to death. So give
Dec 23, 2003, 3:22 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

guruReply
I would recommend keeping an open mind when it comes to Lottosync. There is nothing forcing you to act now to buy the beta version outside of wanting to be in on the fun of testing it and finding out if your state game is one of those it happens to work for at this time. You can be pretty sure if and when the program is what Guru hopes for he will set about proving it works well enough to be worth buying. Until such time we should lay off the carping criticism as if every pause in the process
Dec 17, 2003, 10:47 pm - BobP - Lottery Discussion Forum

Is lottosync any good?Reply
hi all, i think that if this lottosync was any good why would there be all the need for this sampling different numbers surely it would be one sample number would be best for say 6/49 and another would be best for say 5/42 or whatever reading all the posts about it it all just seems too hit and miss and also why 10 numbers if it was that good you would only need 6 it could be that its in a very early development stage and that they plan more accurate versions later on and of course it will cost
Dec 14, 2003, 7:21 am - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum