Search

Sign the petition - eliminate computerized drawings!Reply
I rest my case. You appear not to have good listening (or rather, reading) skills.I never said I was extremely annoyed by opposing views, as you wrongly stated. I said that I was annoyed by people who play devil's advocate with the theory of randomness, when that is not the single (or major) reason for opposing computerized drawings.You appear to have no concept of the argument whatsoever, if you think theoretical garbage is the underpinnings of our argument against computerized drawings.Tel
Aug 25, 2005, 2:47 pm - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Oklahoma Lottery chooses Scientific GamesReply
I don't think it's strange. I think when lottery directors see the negativity that computerized drawings generate, they would MUCH rather use real drawings.It's much easier to move to another state as a startup and go with real drawings, than it is to lose face by admitting a mistake.
Aug 12, 2005, 3:15 pm - Todd - Lottery News

very important poll-computer draws
it would be a tragedy but do you see all the new lotteries from here on out all using computerized drawings?
Aug 8, 2005, 6:22 am - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum

OR P4 GamesReply
the thing i like about oregon are the four drawings a day in pick four.no other state lottery does that many in one day HOWEVER my enthusiasm for this was dampend a bit when i realized that oregon has computerized drawings.though it is a good idea in my opinion especially for those who like pick 4.
Aug 7, 2005, 6:24 pm - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum

Texas Lottery looking at all possibilities for Director PositionReply
if anything watch closely in the next few months for them to sneak in the computerized drawings.that would be the final cruel blow.....
Jul 30, 2005, 3:03 am - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery News

Multi-state gameReply
The blue game is a myth and computerized drawings are far less secure since it's far easier to tamper with.
Jul 30, 2005, 1:32 am - dvdiva - Jackpot Games Forum

Sign the petition - eliminate computerized drawings!Reply
Todd, Lets hope there is no more computerized drawings. I hope that all 50 states can participate in any multi-state game soon.
Jul 25, 2005, 2:26 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery Discussion Forum

Who Would Make The Best LD?Reply
I disagree on Indiana. I would accept the job from ANY state with computerized drawings just so I could rip out the computers, pull the lottery machines out of the back room, and sign a TV broadcast contract. Then I'd hire a great marketing guru, trumpet the event of reverting back to real drawings, and bring in record revenues.Any state disbelieves that I could do it? Try me.
Jul 23, 2005, 11:24 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Sign the petition - eliminate computerized drawings!Reply
I hope that FL joins PB, CT keeps PB, CA keeps MM, and eliminate all computerized drawings in the entire USA.
Jul 22, 2005, 8:43 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery Discussion Forum

ball drawings vs. computersReply
Computerized drawings can ALWAYS be rigged. The Delaware Lottery is a case in point. I have no proof, but every fiber of my being says that lottery is pre-programmed not to select numbers as winners that players have chosen.What is the purpose of computerized drawings anyway? I'll tell you: it has one purpose: to increase the state's profits through covert control of the number selection process against the grid of numbers or combinations selected by the players for each drawing.Ok ok, call me
Jun 24, 2005, 3:15 pm - Greg - Lottery Discussion Forum