Search

Quinto's on a roll, but...Reply
If nobody played, the jackpots would not increase.
Jan 19, 2005, 1:39 pm - CASH Only - Jackpot Games Forum

Texas $45 millionReply
Todd:I believe large jackpots should be highlighed in the Jackpot Games forum.
Jan 13, 2005, 6:13 pm - CASH Only - Jackpot Games Forum

Texas $45 millionReply
https://www.lotterypost.com/jackpots
Jan 13, 2005, 6:10 pm - Todd - Jackpot Games Forum

California SuperLotto Rolls Again!Reply
CO:The Lottery Jackpots page has every jackpot in the US, Canada, and UK, sortable in every which way.Also, the Lottery Results page has the Top 10 lottery jackpots listed.
Jan 11, 2005, 11:10 am - Todd - Jackpot Games Forum

Home just got sweeter for lottery winnersReply
75% of jackpots, 75% of second-tier prizes, 75% of third-tier prizes, etc., etc.
Jan 6, 2005, 9:45 pm - Todd - Lottery News

powerball and mega millions merging....Reply
If you have roughly twice the number of people buying tickets, there would be more jackpots won, hence lower jackpots. The matrix would have to changed to get the same level of high jackpots. I would hope this wouldn't happen. They are fine as they are.
Dec 5, 2004, 12:00 pm - whodeani - Lottery Discussion Forum

powerball and mega millions merging....Reply
i think there would be more winners,and bigger jackpots.
Dec 5, 2004, 3:09 am - luckylottolady - Lottery Discussion Forum

My Made-Up State's LotteryReply
Here's the jackpot billboards that show the record jackpots.
Dec 3, 2004, 11:41 pm - JimmySand9 - Lottery Discussion Forum

higher jackpots vs. keeping matrix low
in powerball and mega millions if you had a choice between adding more numbers to the game and a higher matrix for a bigger jackpot(say 400 million) making it that much harder to win,or would you keep it the way it is but with the understanding that the jackpots wouldn't increase much to record levels
Nov 24, 2004, 12:02 pm - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum

Michigan WinfallReply
Let me explain how a $2 ticket can grow larger jackpots. Using round numbers to make the explanation easier, say for a $1 ticket, 0.25 goes to fund the jackpot, 0.25 goes to lower tier prizes and 0.50 goes for expenses and profit. With a $2 ticket, the split can be 0.25 for lower tier prizes (because the lower tier prizes stay the same), $1 to expenses and profit (maintains the 50% ratio) and that leaves 0.75 to fund the jackpot. That means three times more goes to fund jackpots for $2 tickets a
Nov 9, 2004, 10:01 pm - Jake649 - Jackpot Games Forum