Search

Connecticut: 1/1 - 1/31/2011Reply
That is true Domeman I have a good friend ( a stats person like yourself ) that does it that way and it shows the most due pair or pairs But what I am doing here is eliminating them each month.....one by one.....in a simple fashion......when they are gone....they are gone....for that month Not so much showing what is most due in order........but eliminating them one by one I suppose it is really not showing what is due in my mind ( though they are ) but trying to
Jan 11, 2011, 10:05 am - Astekblue - Pick 3 Forum

Nigerian lottery scammer sentenced to 14 yearsReply
If he's in a state with the death penalty, I say fry the turkey. You want to send a strong message? It's called the process of elimination. Start eliminating the problem, I bet these vermin will think long and hard before they start scamming again. Jail time is an insult. First they scam the victims then they live on our tax dollars in prison for years. NO!!! EXTERMINATE!!! EXTERMINATE!!!! EXTERMINATE!!!! Dalek
Dec 2, 2010, 9:50 am - PERDUE - Lottery News

California Fantasy 5 Jackpot Strings Coming SOONReply
Hello eddessa, Yes, this is a system I wrote and backtested extensively and have seen it work over and over. It all has to do with a process of elimination. It works for every state but CA is the only one I had time to figure out at the moment. Each state would have different strings to choose from but these are what will be hot only in CA. Patience is needed with this system so my best advice is to pick a string and stick with it. How you wheel the numbers will be the key, of course :) I
Sep 10, 2010, 9:44 pm - lottolaughs - Pick 5 Forum

My digit system for pick-5 or pick-6 lotteryReply
Wish I knew how to write software. Wouldn't have to have mine done for me. I agree with the Random Logic of numbers. Love to get into discussion with people formally trained in mathematics because I hear the same ole story all the time...... Numbers are Random and each one as the same chance of playing as another . Then I show them the how numbers can be tracked lol Right now have some people creating software for me for a 35 number system where you Pick 4 numbers. There is no math to it. Gue
Jul 29, 2010, 3:10 pm - Clipper - Lottery Systems Forum

30 Sums MethodReply
Hi Diamondpalace: This is a very interesting statistic. The 30 sum elimination filter is easy to implement on Lotwin as a user defined filter. It would be interesting to see how this plays out when applying the filter and then doing a Reduction for getting 3 or 4 numbers correct. jayemmar
Dec 8, 2009, 10:35 am - jayemmar - Lottery Systems Forum

Straight in WC 2Reply
Trying a variety of elimination process from a large group of numbers but still can't seem to manage reducing it further than 91 plays... offshore its under $25 to win $225 for the str8, so not a bad return... heres what i got... if someone can tell me of another reduction to elim. these further, please do so... 038, 047, 061, 083, 106, 136, 146, 149, 160, 163, 164, 183, 190, 194, 237, 253, 263, 273, 274, 283, 293, 308, 316, 318, 327, 348, 349, 352, 358, 361, 362, 364, 370, 372, 376, 380,
Nov 14, 2009, 11:26 am - Rakster - Pick 3 Forum

Tennessee may cap lottery winnings at $600 for poorReply
I think some here apparently think that all Welfare/Food stamp recipients are deadbeats who are too lazy to get a job despite the fact there are many single, tax paying parents out there who have children and do in fact work, sometimes more than one job and still need assistance be it food stamps or Medi-cade. The real problem IS those who are just comfortable suckling at the government teat or actually have kids so they can get more money and continue to receive it or flat out abuse the system
Apr 8, 2009, 7:00 pm - DC81 - Lottery News

Question regarding filters...
Hi all, I've been meaning to bring this up for a while. All this talk about gap systems as filters just aroused my curiousity again. Although I'm diligently developing my system knowing not nearly as much as the rest of you, I'm of the school that believes in elimination rather than prediction. To that extent, I was wondering if any of you could impart to me the fundamentals of filtering systems, besides the gap system? Particularly systems I could use in conjunction with the gap system. Anyo
Sep 17, 2008, 9:31 pm - Jimhowlett - Lottery Systems Forum

Do you have the "FEELING" that you'll win or just the "HOPE"?Reply
I've looked for methods that consistently matches most of the drawn number and that would be the 3s and 4s in pick-5 games. Most people would think that if I said I have a system that greatly increases your odds of getting 6/6 on a Pick 6 game , they would also think that the same thing applies to the lower tier prizes(2/6, 3/6, 4/6, and 5/6). However, this does not apply to my system. Well, it does, but not nearly as much as what most people would think. You see, my system uses elimination,
Jun 13, 2008, 8:44 pm - Guru101 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Capitalize on pairs.Reply
Hi Amazing Grace, what I ve been working on the last few months is a system with pairs that is based on creating variations from each days number. It s kind of hard to explain but I ve found a way to effectively filter out at least half of the 100 possible combinations as a starting point. After additional elimination I ve got about 6 numbers to play. The problem is it still doesn t come in enough without being forced to use progressive wagering. However when doing the same system with both
Sep 30, 2007, 11:34 pm - LottoBuster - Lottery Systems Forum