Search

Lottosync V1.7 - is it fixed?Reply
I doubt if Lottosync V1.7 is broke. Can it be improved? Maybe. If the fact that a lottery program can't pick a winner is an indication that it is broke, then all lottery programs are broke. Lottery programs are tools. Are they tools that will help a player win? Maybe. Should programmers sell lottery programs that can't help a player win? Why not if players already know that programs don't work and still want to buy one anyway. Players need some one to blame when they lose their
Feb 4, 2006, 4:18 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

LS1.8 AppearanceReply
As a purchaser of the LS. I to am waiting for 1.8 to come out for some time. I have to agree with Lantern that Marco simply cannot make it perform any better than what it is. Personally, I want 1.8 for it's Keno ability. I to as a purchaser have sent many emails over the last 2 years to Marco. It is very rare that he responds to his customers. i beleive he needs to improve on his customer service. Sure Marco has popped up on LP here over the last 2 years to tantalize us with assurances th
Jan 22, 2006, 10:10 am - Raziel - Lottery Systems Forum

LottosyncReply
Well one of the first questions might be whether today's lottery software would have been more effective against the lotteries of twenty years ago? Are we dealing with more perfect random these days?It seems to me, when we predict 24 numbers out of 49 we usually get 3 correct or one off more or less the same distribution of odd/even or low/high, but when I use lottery software I often do worse like it's coded backwards or something so it doesn't even play at house odds. One would think it possi
Aug 5, 2005, 1:37 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

LottosyncReply
LOTTOSYNC - preds : Belgium 6/42 results Hits 8-Oct 01 03 08 15 16 17 21 25 34 39 - 03 16 20 21 31 36+22 3/10 11-Oct 04 09 12 15 23 25 26 29 34 39 - 06 19 26 27 34 37+11 2/1015-Oct no play, but look at preds above - 08 12 25 26 29 39+18 no play18-Oct 01 02 03 07 20 21 23 24 31 36 - 03 08 09 13 24 37+36 2/10 +B22-Oct no play 03 05 08 22 32 35+29 no play
Jul 27, 2005, 12:49 pm - paul762 - Lottery Systems Forum

I think I am on to something big...But...Reply
Did Sandy really say that she didn't need Genius system and that she does very well off her own? Does she win every day like Genius......nope. She also said she hit straight the other day with one of hers too. Is that every day.....nope. I was just looking at her predictions and it looks like she predicts the same set of numbers across 10-20 states or more. Isn't that the law of large numbers or something? Anybody could do the same by picking 6 sets of numbers and predicting them across 2
May 10, 2005, 8:00 pm - xavier102772 - Lottery Systems Forum

Let Guru Go (1,2,3 Gone)Reply
I still play with LSI usually keep quiet about what I have won or not won on the forum but here goes. I found it does not do all that great in 6 number games.....I have won 8 (3 numbers) and 2 (4 number) wins in Ontario 6/49 for a total of 200.00+ after you take ticket costs away no profit I was in the hole in the 6 number games. Which is what most of the concern is for many here.Where I found lottotsync to work was in daily Ontario Keno......However LS 1.6 and 1.7 are not set up for Keno...you
Apr 17, 2005, 12:01 pm - Raziel - Lottery Systems Forum

Computer geeks!!Reply
Sandy said All the work people and my husband tell me not upgrade........get a new computer because when you upgrade all little pieces of the prior one are left behind and you can never clean it all up. I think that they are right. All I know for sure is I hate Compaq (HP) computers........had 2 in my life and both were junk. I myself don't like DELL COMPUTERS.But I like cheap emachines.Sandy, you don't have to buy a new computer if you don't want to, so long as your present PC can do all that
Mar 3, 2005, 5:18 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Discussion Forum

What prize is Lottosync aimed at?Reply
Thanks for the bit of information, but still my point has been missed I think. I know the software is going to be better than average . I think I've already established that fact. But is it really any better than simply applying the strategy I outlined above? Also, if somebody thinks it is, please show us the proof, meaning lottery, data set, calculations and Lottosync predictions against actual draws. Vick:On a side note, how are you using it to pick Keno...I'm not very familiar with Keno?
Mar 2, 2005, 10:48 am - xavier102772 - Lottery Systems Forum

Gail Howard's Wheel Wins In New YorkReply
Quote: Originally posted by Maryland on February 21, 2005I'm Maryland #997. Gail Howards software is great. The news release is probably true, I haven't investgated it. But you want me to believe that Gail Howard communicates with you privately by email is a little hard to swallow. She doesn't even send out emails to her CUSTOMERS about patch upgrades and the sorts. Then you want me to believe that she comes here reads the post and then wants you to reply to them for her. Besides you, Mave
Feb 21, 2005, 2:31 am - Maverick - Pick 5 Forum

abreviatted wheelsReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on November 30, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Vinicius on November 29, 2004The only bad thing about this strategy is that is a bit too expensive. You must play in a lotto pool to minimize the costs. The average bet usually goes for around 180 dollars.Any strategy is expensive if it loses money. How much have you won with this strategy?RJOhA lot, well lets put it this way, Im still spending prize money, in lottery ticktes. in 2001 i got my first nice prize, w
Nov 30, 2004, 8:40 am - Vinicius - Lottery Systems Forum