Search

Is XYZ system a Scum???Reply
Many people who use a system and invest a lot of money playing it, expect to win a jackpot in a short period of time or at the very least win more money than they spend. When that doesn't happen, they call the system a scam. These people expectations are reasonable. Promoter of these systems should make sure the users of the system understand what a systems can and can not do.RJOh
Feb 25, 2002, 8:41 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Protest Changing the Big Game!Reply
I agree with you Jack. Playing the lotteries is gambling and if you don't like the odds, you shouldn't play. It's in the states' best interest to manage the jackpots and odds of winning to attract the most players.RJOh
Feb 20, 2002, 6:34 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Protest Changing the Big Game!Reply
Ohio is adding the Biggame lottery to get more Ohioian playing lotteries in Ohio instead of neighboring states. Ohio SuperLottoPlus has odds of 1:451 of winning of at least $5, Biggame(Michigan)odds of 1:31 for $1 and Powerball(Indiana,Kentucky, West Virgina and soon Pennsylvania)odds of 1:35 for $5. The reconfigured Biggame will have to be competitive with Powerball to keep Ohioian in Ohio. The people that run the lotteries know that. The odds of winning the jackpot will get harder but the smal
Feb 20, 2002, 3:12 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Powerball test.Reply
Winning Numbers for 01/26/02 were 05-14-15-22-30 PB(31)To match 4 + PB you would have had to play with 90% coverage from list, which would have been 5/45 + 1/31 which has 37,874,529 possible combinations. Sum of numbers was 86 and range was 25 and of the previous 441 records this combination matched 3-2 times, 2-35 times and one 159 times. This was a test and it was interesting.RJOh
Jan 26, 2002, 10:44 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Ohio SuperLottoPlus 16M 01/16/02Reply
Hey there RJOH,You and I are nearly using the same setup numbers wise. From what you posted and my setup, we seem a bit scattered. Have you any thoughts on how to narrow the gap? I'd be interested in sharing my meager knowledge. TEUFEL
Jan 16, 2002, 8:58 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

BG picks>>>01/15/02
LUCKY WON $2 > TODD RJOH WON $1 EACH I HAD THE HIGHEST % >>> BILLYLOCO FORGOT TO POST ANYBODYS # >>> I POSTED MINE >>> YANKEE HAD THE B I G # 6 TIMES > HE WON $110 > HE IS D MAN !! > AIN'T SPENDING MANY $$ FOR AWHILE >> > B I G MONEY < >4-6-21-24-38 > 31-21-23-24-38 > 33-11-27-28-30 > 32-14-17=26-32 > 16MO LATER!
Jan 12, 2002, 2:12 pm - billyloco - Lottery Discussion Forum

Buckeye5-OhioReply
That's interesting, however I don't follow the pick3/4 lotteries. A note: 20% of the possible pick3 combinations are doubles. Hope you do come up with a winning system for Buckeye5.RJOh
Jan 11, 2002, 11:36 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Buckeye5-OhioReply
RJOH, You answered what I've probably known all along, but thanks for the reply. Larry.Ps:What do you think of the six(6) double numbers in a row for the evening pick3? Most likly what I may have said about this so called random fall of the balls!
Jan 10, 2002, 10:30 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Buckeye5-OhioReply
I play Buckeye5 when the other jackpots are low, but matching 4 or 5 numbers is harder than during the same thing in SuperLotoPlus, but they pay more. With those kinds of odds you probably would have to invest as you do for the larger jackpots. When I play I usually play 8 sets of numbers. I almost always get a $1 win, occasionally I get a three and it been over a year since I match 4. Good luck to you.RJOh
Jan 10, 2002, 1:26 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

BIG GAME picks >>01/01/02
BILLYLOCO-$5 > LUCKY $4 > RJOH > $1 >> YANKEE WINS % WITH 11.90 TO LUCKYS 11.66 >> AT LEAST SOME OF US WON $$$>>> B I G MONEY <<<<br>20-21-29-43-46 >> 2011-16-18-19-43 >> 209-11-18-19-43 >> 203-11-19-43-48 >> 203-10-11-44-46 >> 231-2-32-33-47 >> 231-18-18-22-24 >> 23MORE TO COME LATER
Dec 29, 2001, 6:19 am - billyloco - Lottery Discussion Forum