Search

Info On RNG'SReply
Respectfully, I disagree. I think the players who don't care are the ones who don't know about it, or are only casual players who play when the JP is big. However, when even casual players find out about computerized drawings they are at first surprised (because the lottery tries to trick people into believing balls are still being used), and then the next reaction is why? When they learn even more their reaction becomes, we should switch back to balls. These are not comments made
Sep 14, 2007, 10:44 pm - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Florida: 4/1 - 4/30/2026Reply
Yeah computerized drawings are a whole different animal than ball machines. Computerized drawings should be boycotted. But with ball machines, it's an extremely rare occurrence to see the results come out like this within 3 consecutive drawings. The 95 pair just hit for the 5th consecutive time. I can't remember ever seeing the same pair hit 5x in a row. I'm mean sure these events are bound to happen eventually over the years. I've just never seen this happen in my 17 years o
Apr 28, 2026, 1:51 pm - LottoIntuitive - Pick 3 Forum

Anti rigged lottery systems " NEW RULES "Reply
Unfortunately even those measures cannot protect computerized drawings. Whatever is shown on the screen even if you're showing the computer code that is supposedly running is not what is happening inside the computer. A computer runs machine language, which is just a bunch of numbers. It is the native language of the CPU in the computer. (Sometimes people refer to it as Assembly Language, but Assembly is the numbers translated into psuedo words, and not the actual thing that is executing.) I
Oct 10, 2021, 6:20 pm - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Colorado man who unwittingly split a $4.8M jackpot with scammer is fighting the Colorado LotteryNews Story
In 2005, three people won a Colorado Lotto jackpot worth $4.8 million, and Boulder's Amir Massihzadeh held one set of winning numbers. He accepted his prize of $568,990 after splitting the pot and paying taxes and moved on with life. Ten years later, Colorado Bureau of Investigation agents visited Massihzadeh to interview him about his winning number because they were investigating a criminal scheme to rig lotteries. They suspected the other two ticket-holders who split the prize with Mass
Apr 15, 2019, 10:14 am - Todd - Lottery News

California: 3/1 - 3/31/2017Reply
Woolly DD, I hear you and agree. Early this month I went to the sideline because of that reason, not able to track, my workout (math) no longer comparable to D3 draws. My gut feeling, CL is cheating... California State Lottery Report Card is a Grade D California (38% true lottery drawings) True Drawings: Mega Millions, Powerball, SuperLotto Plus Computerized: Daily 3 Evening, Daily 3 Midday, Daily 4, Daily Derby, Fantasy 5 We as players has to petition to eliminate computerized dr
Mar 21, 2017, 2:38 am - calady*714 - Pick 3 Forum

Maryland lottery players winning big with Pick 4Reply
There are out of MD. state posters here, MD P3 and P4 is ball drawn little balls floating around in plexiglass air chamber, not RNG, they can't evade or program any outcome unless they go to computerized drawings that is why MD is an A rated lottery. Grade: A Maryland (89% true lottery drawings) True Drawings: Bonus Match 5, Mega Millions, Multi-Match, Pick 3 Evening, Pick 3 Midday, Pick 4 Evening, Pick 4 Midday, Powerball Computerized: 5 Card Cash They change this and
Aug 18, 2014, 10:55 pm - jarasan - Lottery News

Computerized drawings are nice ...
and profitable! Sure, for individual persons that could predict the winning combinations. Sometimes it is easier to guess computerized numbers, this is one of the complains. But it should make a better return for the money invested on the lottery, at least for the players. One nice example of electronic game is the Ohio Ten-Oh drawings, twice per day, seven days per week. Sure that not everybody would like fixed ten spot Keno games ... But it is better than nothing!!! Multi Sta
Oct 27, 2007, 1:16 pm - Yukio - Lottery Discussion Forum

Tennessee Lottery computerized drawings flawed since inceptionReply
One other thing I thought of: I thought the draw computers were supposed to be locked up, with no access from anyone other than the person who presses the button to generate the results? That's what they lead people to believe. But apparently that's not the case, because some person ran a test on the draw computer, according to their e-mail (before the programming error was finally caught). So I guess people DO have access to the machines. I really hope everyone is getting this.
Aug 22, 2007, 10:22 am - Todd - Lottery News

Tenn. Lottery players complaining over switch from numbered ballsReply
No. Traditional drawings cannot be just as easily -- or as thoroughly -- manipulated as computerized drawings can. If you read my postings (or a dozen other peoples') on this subject over the past month you would understand. You can't SEE what is happening in a computer. There are infinite more ways that a computer could screw up the drawing. Let's take, for example, a drawing screw-up. Everyone has seen a YouTube or Google video of lottery balls falling all over the floor when a dra
Aug 8, 2007, 6:19 pm - Todd - Lottery News

strike the lottoReply
That's the spirit! If you're going to organize something like that, the trick is to make sure that people know about it ahead of time, including the state lottery. So when there is a dip in sales it can be directly attributed to the boycott. It's too bad that some states went to computerized drawings, and it's too bad that it seems to require a player revolt in order to coerce them to switch back to traditional drawings. I would personally support a targeted boycott that would demonstr
Feb 23, 2007, 9:22 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum