Search

If I reduce the MM or PB number pool by half and play 3o2e/3e2o...(?)Reply
First, you aren't reducing the number pool at all. Each of the 56 choices can be used in any combination that mixes odd and even. If you want to reduce the number pool to half you'd actually eliminate half of them from consideration. Whether you get rid of all the odd numbers, all the even numbers, 1 to 28, 29 to 56, or eliminate half of them at random, cutting the number pool in half means choosing from a pool of 28 numbers. Picking 5 numbers from a pool of 28 there are 98,280 possible combina
Mar 20, 2007, 7:24 pm - KY Floyd - Lottery Systems Forum

How ComesReply
EASY: 1) For me, I have more fun playing PB, and my realistic aim there is to get 5 WB, and if I get a JP, great. I know, I know, the odds are not as good for a PB Pick 5 as opposed to a 'straight' Pick 5, but it pays more. To some of us, the odds are the same regardless of if they are 1 in 5 million vs. 1 in 20 million. 2) Because everyone has a different definition of 'numerology'. 3) Because folks like to argue about stuff they can't argue about, and not the details of
Nov 18, 2006, 12:09 pm - guesser - Lottery Discussion Forum

Incredible and spectacular pick 3 toolReply
Hi Rick, my problem is the rain, but i don't think anyone is interested in that ;-) oops, sorry for asking questions, i didn't realize it made someone look as if they were in pit bull attack mode . btw, it is really great, truly amazing, to see how everyone is typing down their systems/methods, i mean that. Sorry if i pissed u off by asking questions Rick! You seem well duh Winning the lottery, Rick? lol Thanx for pointing out the prediction statistics. Glad to see
Aug 13, 2006, 5:58 pm - paurths - Lottery Systems Forum

Powerball theoriesReply
I hear you. That's an excellent reason. Seems to me so long as a system's flawed enough to keep a person from getting a big win with it, sharing ain't a problem. For Pick 5 and Multi-State Jackpot games nobody's going to believe it, anyway. At least they won't believe it until it's demonstrated by a several-win series on the prediction board, or by an actual 2 each win series of real-money wagers, that it works (which you'd probably not be motivated to announce). If you manage
Jul 5, 2006, 4:18 pm - Rip Snorter - Lottery Systems Forum

No delusion-100% winning methodReply
It is easy to understand how fast a person can get excited about a discovery they make! When I made the discovery of reversing the last 2 digits with the add 12 subtract 12 it was working out every draw, so of course I was excited and posted it. Well then it started to skip days and still does but has its consistent good days as well LOL! The problem with systems is the maker or the person whom discovers it and is trying to explain it knows the system in their head very well but must
May 21, 2006, 10:14 pm - Clairvoyance - Lottery Systems Forum

Match 6 whim QP almost does it again...Reply
Yeah as I said many times before, close losses hurt a lot more than way off ones. At least for me. But they do provide a quick spectacle of hope, and I cannot wait for that feeling to last for a much longer time! Ironically I spent about $40 the last time, and got back $28 I think. So I seem to get more of a return when I only play a QP or two. That is a major problem, and an annoyance to dedicated lottery players like myself, and others here with systems. Can't play much of a system with on
Mar 14, 2006, 11:59 pm - sirbrad - Jackpot Games Forum

What does a Winning formula require?
I think of a winning formula as a multiplication problem. If you take a comment made on another post: incorpate all the systems, gems,sums,V-tracs,Elimination,pairs, lead and pointers, and you will be able to narrow it down. You would have gems x sums x V-tracs x Elimination x pairs x leads and pointers =a win=1 So if V-tracs=0 then you lose If V-tracs is only half right then your final equivalency is less than 1 and you lose Consequently, each element must be 100% corre
Feb 24, 2006, 1:03 pm - JKING - Mathematics Forum

Has any given up on their search for.....Reply
Quote: Originally posted by QWEST46 on February 18, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Badger on February 18, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by QWEST46 on February 17, 2006 From all the years I have spent learning about probablity, in the end, what I have found out is that you have learned that you cannot know how things will turn out to be for certain -- you know that you cannot know for sure. That's the bottom line. It's better to save your money and make wise investments rather than throwing it
Feb 18, 2006, 11:02 am - Chewie - Lottery Discussion Forum

Wow This Place has Changed!!Reply
Here's another good one. Robin Dunbar and the Magic Number of 150 From http://www.commonsenseadvice.com/index.htmlThe Magic of 150Your brain is hard wired to pay attention to about 150 people. Try to have a relationship with any more than that, and your life will turn to pure crap. Just ask the Military, Gore-Tex, or Krippendorf's tribe. They'll all tell you the same thing. One fifty is the way to go. They've known for hundreds of years that people work best in groups of 150 or less. Now it's y
Jan 22, 2006, 11:54 am - WIN D - Pick 3 Forum

Lottery software development ideasReply
When someone comes up with a system or program that pick a group of numbers that consistently do better than a similar group of random numbers then they will have something.-------------------------------------------------Ok here goes, it has taken me about 1 1/2 years to develope it,with one exception, it is not in a workable software program yet. I have the system, it will revolutionize the entire lottery world, all systems on the market will become Obsolete. My system gives the player the 6 w
Mar 26, 2005, 1:30 am - biglooooser - Lottery Systems Forum