Search

Maddogs Mega Millions Challenge 9/19Reply
To bad RJOh corrected him on that, I would have loved to have seen the look on his face when 56 popped up! Congrats to all the winners!!!!!
Sep 20, 2006, 8:40 am - fja - Jackpot Games Forum

Everyone works so hardReply
Thanks RJOH I'll do that depending on how I do this Powerball run. You're method seems to work very well from the results you are getting on the smaller prizes however so in your case I don't think I could help
Sep 18, 2006, 11:12 pm - dvdiva - Lottery Discussion Forum

Steve Player is back with a new systemReply
Both you and RJOh are correct. You can't buy something like a system and post it on the public forums. I'm talking about an copy of the actual text itself. However, people can post all the opinons they want, and are encouraged to do so, as long as they are not doing it purely for a marketing purpose. (spam) I would considering posting the full text of a scam system for sale, however, as a way to keep people from buying it. They can sue me if they like, as the extra publicity of a lawsuit ma
Sep 18, 2006, 11:36 am - Todd - Lottery Systems Forum

PB Challenge 9/9Reply
nclottoplayer, Both you and RJOh completely missed the point of what I said, but since you've raised this issue, allow me to ask you a question. If no one person can win the PowerBall jackpot by his own methods, exactly how will that feat be accomplished by getting together with other people who cannot win a jackpot by their own methods? It sounds like you're saying that a lot of losing methods must add up to a winning method. I don't understand your reasoning.
Sep 11, 2006, 5:50 am - ayenowitall - Jackpot Games Forum

PB Challenge 9/9Reply
Congrats to all the winners..... RJOH it's been a long time coming but congrats on your 4+0
Sep 10, 2006, 8:28 am - fja - Jackpot Games Forum

PB Challenge 9/9Reply
Congrats to: RJOH Ayenowitall Konane TheGameGrl LuckyGirl Litebets27!! Well Done!! Next Jackpot $137,000,000
Sep 10, 2006, 3:20 am - geos*5666! - Jackpot Games Forum

finders keeper, losers weepers, we lost a $5,000,000 instant winnerReply
RJOh, when I was reading this thread, the story you just cited immediately came to mind. Similar style - in that previous story, the children was used. In this instant case, it's a sister . In fact, I quite suspected, it's the same poster.
Sep 5, 2006, 11:54 am - csfb - Lottery Discussion Forum

oklahoma cash 5 is a jokeReply
Todd - Yes, the news article in LP mentions the larger amount. However, on the OK Lottery website, the $35,211 amount is displayed in something like 4pt agate, while the $25,000 TAX FREE is displayed as the actual jackpot. I try to go to the horse's mouth, so to speak, before I post anything regarding payouts on my website. RJOh - I've always read your posts with interest whether I disagree with the content or not - you put some thought behind them. I'm not always right, either. Todd
Sep 3, 2006, 4:35 pm - johnph77 - Pick 5 Forum

oklahoma cash 5 is a jokeReply
RJOh - OK pays out the $25K tax free . In the fine print on the OK Lottery website the value of the prize is fixed at $35,211, the amount quoted in my table, which is the amount necessary for the net prize after average federal and state taxes have been withheld.
Sep 3, 2006, 3:14 am - johnph77 - Pick 5 Forum

Ohio Rolling Cash5 is on a roll againReply
I stand corrected, I didn't know any other games beside the Virgina lottery had ever had a jackpot that paid out more dollars than it had possible combinations, maybe it's not as rare as I thought. I wonder how many times it has happened for other lotteries in the past. I only knew of the Virgina lottery because of the news coverage at the time. RJOh
Sep 2, 2006, 4:03 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum