Search

Two Lottery booksReply
I totally agree with RJOh. These systems are nothing special, and are intended to make the person hawking the system wealthy. The person duplicates the system , perhaps changes one or two things, and claims that it is their own.I can very easily win very often with 60 lines. There is no rocket science to that. I don't consider winning 3-match and occasionally 4-match prizes using 60 lines to be effective , because the odds of winning a 3-match in a 6/49 game are 1 in 57! See how redic
Feb 27, 2005, 1:47 pm - Todd - Lottery Systems Forum

Two Lottery booksReply
Quote: Originally posted by MillionsWanted on February 27, 2005I agree. Ken Silvers systems is not that bad as many people want it to be. I've won quite frequently, almost 8 out of 10 times when playing 60 lines. With sixty lines, I would expect to win something most of the times even with QP's. Did you ever test his system against an equal amount of random numbers over the same period of time? He claimed he made a fortune using (selling) his system, but playing that many lines and never matc
Feb 27, 2005, 1:35 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

To Post or not to PostReply
Quote: Originally posted by Bingo Long on February 27, 2005I'm a little confused as to why people post their predictions on here. If someone picks the same numbers as you, won't that make your winning ticket worth less? That's the cost for bragging rights. Anyone can and many do say after the drawings, I knew those numbers were going to hit, but I didn't or couldn't play them. Nobody want to hear that or cares what you played after the drawings are over. If you are picking big winners and wan
Feb 27, 2005, 12:43 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

A New Way Of Picking 6 Numbers:Reply
History often repeats itself. It's no different with lotteries, for example, the last drawing in OhioSuperLotto the winning numbers were 07-10-34-42-46-4949 hit one draw back34 and 42 hit three draws back07 and 46 hit six draws back10 hit seven draws back*All the winning numbers had hit in the previous eight drawingsOn 02/16/05 the winning numbers were 22-24-33-35-40-4333 hit two draws back24 and 35 hit three draws back22 and 40 hit six draws back43 hit eight draws back*All the winning numbers
Feb 26, 2005, 4:25 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

MM Drawing for Friday 02-25-05Reply
Quote: Originally posted by fja on February 25, 2005I have somewhat of a similar theory, and my history indicator says that atleast 4 of the 5 numbers drawn will have come from the last 7 drawings in February (27 numbers drawn in Feb gives me a 50/50 chance of this being true).....(just tracking outside the box)...In 8 of the last 282 drawings, all the winnings numbers were in a pool of numbers from the previous 7 drawings which had 22-31 numbers. Using past history I calculated the chances of
Feb 25, 2005, 9:19 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Men who threw away $100,000 scratch ticket now seek prizeReply
These guys are going feel sh**** on if they find out it was just a publicity stump pulled by the actual winner, she can always claim it was just a joke. Ohio once published a story about a $8M jackpot ticket that was canceled by a women who played the wrong numbers by mistake and now most people will buy any extra tickets printed mistakenly rather the have them canceled, I know I do. I doubted the story from the beginning because who would be dumb enough to tell anyone they found something tha
Feb 25, 2005, 2:40 pm - RJOh - Lottery News

IonSaliu GeneratorReply
Quote: Originally posted by Bertil on February 24, 2005 RJohn, Selfrespecting scientists share their ideas with others in publications. Those whe claim they have a solution to a problem but refuse to demonstrate it are usually regarded as crack pots. The formula can have only marginal value if any. Deriving one would be an intellectual challenge and yield personal satisfaction. It would not help to win lottos, except to add another f
Feb 24, 2005, 11:59 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

OhioSuperLottoPlus...02/23/05..$15MReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on February 23, 2005Chief,Today, I'm just working on picking numbers for OSLP. For Friday's MM, I'll probably use the same profile logic I used last time. I was surprised I hit 3 for $7 since none of the numbers were in the last seven drawings. I used a profile than included the last 1-15 drawings and all the winning numbers hit in the last 8-16 drawings but were within the statistical odds of a match 3 and I got lucky. Had I included that extra week, who know
Feb 23, 2005, 2:17 pm - kbcherokee - Jackpot Games Forum

OhioSuperLottoPlus...02/23/05..$15MReply
Chief,Today, I'm just working on picking numbers for OSLP. For Friday's MM, I'll probably use the same profile logic I used last time. I was surprised I hit 3 for $7 since none of the numbers were in the last seven drawings. I used a profile than included the last 1-15 drawings and all the winning numbers hit in the last 8-16 drawings but were within the statistical odds of a match 3 and I got lucky. Had I included that extra week, who knows what might had happened, but I was trying to reduce
Feb 23, 2005, 11:26 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

OhioSuperLottoPlus...02/23/05..$15MReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on February 23, 2005With odds of 1 : 13,983,816 of winning a $15M jackpot, I will be picking up some tickets this evening for sure. Good luck OhioSuperLottoPlus players.RJOhRJOH:Did ya win a little bit with your three MM Numbers?I'm starting early to see if I can zero in on Friday's MM Draw. Have you done anything with it yet? I've selected 13-numbers so far and still have a little ways to go before I filter things out.So far I have these numbers:10, 11, 14,
Feb 23, 2005, 11:04 am - kbcherokee - Jackpot Games Forum