Search

MM Drawing for Friday 12-31-04Reply
These are my MegaMillions picks for the last night of the yearFILE : MX123104 01 05 18 21 39 +04 07 16 26 33 45 +51 13 22 29 51 52 +28 09 15 34 36 43 +39 08 17 30 31 50 +05 19 20 24 25 35 +01 04 12 14 42 44 +08 23 28 32 37 46 +26 02 03 10 41 47 +37 11 27 40 48 49 +42 25 30 42 43 51 +46 10 13 20 27 34 +03 21 26 31 32 40 +35 03 04 09 29 37 +06 05 07 15 28
Dec 31, 2004, 10:43 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Lottery Players ConventionReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on December 31, 2004Quote: Originally posted by BobP on December 30, 2004I said this half in jest as many of his (Steve Player) systems do claim to have broken the code, I've always taken that as advertising hype not fact Has he or anyone else claiming to have broken this lottery code ever written down any notations suggesting what this code might be or does he and others selling similar lotteries systems and software think it's beyond the simple thinking capabil
Dec 31, 2004, 9:52 pm - BobP - Lottery Discussion Forum

computers record the combinations playedReply
Quote: Originally posted by Maverick on December 24, 2004Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on December 24, 2004All that information is necessary to confirm the real winners and to know the actual amount that should be paid out. To know the actual amount that should be paid out. Ahh there we go. Lemme ask another question. How about if the combinations were on the ticket/s bought, but a technique was made where the combinations did not show up on their end, on their computers, all to keep our conf
Dec 24, 2004, 1:10 am - Maverick - Lottery Discussion Forum

computers record the combinations playedReply
Quote: Originally posted by Maverick on December 24, 2004Hmm, validate meaning to know whose ticket won? If yes, are there other ways for them to know if a ticket won? Like serial numbers on the ticket is one way I think. The serial numbers are checked in a raffle because that's what you buy when you buy a raffle ticket. In a lottery, the serial number is associated with numbers on the ticket, if you don't know what should be on the ticket, the serial number has no value. That is the differen
Dec 24, 2004, 12:44 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

computers record the combinations playedReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on December 24, 2004All that information is necessary to confirm the real winners and to know the actual amount that should be paid out. To know the actual amount that should be paid out. Ahh there we go. Lemme ask another question. How about if the combinations were on the ticket/s bought, but a technique was made where the combinations did not show up on their end, on their computers, all to keep our confidence in the lotteries' trueness. So if someone did have
Dec 24, 2004, 12:35 am - Maverick - Lottery Discussion Forum

Mr Bobp ..others ...whatayathink?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by BobP on December 20, 2004 ........There have been several lottery softwares that apply hundreds to thousands of systems against a draw history to supposedly find the best system(s) for you to play.These systems are very simple one up one down kind of critters and you quickly learn what worked yesterday doesn't work tomorrow................ BobPThe objective should be to find a system or combinations of systems that have worked often enough in the past that it is re
Dec 21, 2004, 5:44 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

PB Drawing for Saturday 12-18-04Reply
Sounds reasonable. I think I understand.In the PB game with 42 bonus numbers there are 120,526,770 possible combinations with forty-two 5of5 combinations. Since one of them wins the jackpot there are 41 left that can win second prize, thus 120,526,770/41=2,939,677.31Without the bonus ball there are 2,869,685 possible combinations with only one 5of5 combination that can win. Using the rounded up numbers in the calculations resulted in 2,869,776 instead of 2,869,685 which is actually the possibl
Dec 19, 2004, 12:12 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

For those who use draw history...Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Bertil on December 17, 2004I seem to have read that a poster on LP claimed he eliminated the numbers from the last draw and then made his selection from the remaining numbers thereby thinking he changed the odds significantly....... Has anybody looked at this idea and done a statistical analysis by computer simulation? I didn't do a computer simulation, but I looked at past drawings of several lotteries that I play including MM, PB, OH649 plus and Buckeye5 and fou
Dec 18, 2004, 7:57 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

MegaMillions..12/17/2004Reply
I opted for getting lucky and played these 20 lines trying to do better than the 260 lines I posted above.FILE : MM121704 17 18 22 31 43 +29 04 05 12 32 50 +35 15 27 36 37 51 +04 01 03 16 28 40 +24 07 19 24 42 45 +14 13 14 26 49 52 +27 23 29 34 41 48 +03 22 25 27 33 39 +51 03 10 14 21 42 +37 12 15 19 30 47 +28 16 20 23 25 32 +46 11 30 37 40 44 +33 28 36 46 47 49 +05
Dec 17, 2004, 10:39 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

MM for tues 12-14-04Reply
Quote: Originally posted by CASH Only on December 15, 2004Why play NY Lotto 6/59 and get only a 38%-40% return on your wager when Massachusetts' Ca$h WinFall pays back 60% (and gives you a free play for matching 2/6)? New York Lotto jackpot is $38M this week. A $38M jackpot is worth $38M in any state regardless of the state's percent of return to its players. I have yet to hear of a jackpot winner refusing that kind of money because the percent of return was too low. If you're not winning, the
Dec 16, 2004, 4:32 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum