Search

Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbersReply
RL-RANDOMLOGIC, Your observation of the difference in the frequency of sets with more or less odd or even numbers is analogous to observing that the sum of the 5 numbers in a majority of sets falls into a minority of the total range of possible sums. The same is true for observing the number of unique digits in a set, or the average spread between the numbers. None of these patterns have anything to do with the probability of any particular set emerging. They just ARE! I thought my poi
Jan 16, 2011, 12:20 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Let's create a "So what" testReply
In football, it's all about percentages. You put your team in a position with the most favorable matchups and call the play with the best chance of success. Sometime it works. Sometimes it doesn't. But you come away from that particular experience knowing you did the best you could. Behind the scenes you go back, you look it over, and see what you have to do to correct the problem, if there was one, or continue with the same idea. Lottery is the a lot like that. Now maybe I missed the point o
Nov 28, 2010, 1:12 am - garyo1954 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Fooled by RandomnessReply
(It's really getting annoying to have to keep telling you [and others] that the results I'm reporting here are NOT in support of a betting system that I am proposing, or would ever propose. They are part of a process of understanding LOTTERY SYSTEMS! The Quest for a Blockbuster System So, here is our first SYSTEM in the Fooled by Randomness thread! Your post on August 3 sure looks you either already have a system or you're trying to create one. If you and RL would stop trying
Aug 18, 2010, 3:03 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Systems Forum

My digit system for pick-5 or pick-6 lotteryReply
Unbelievable! So, then, are you telling me that you don't believe the Gambler's Fallacy is really a fallacy? If your answer is yes, then that explains why you believe that some things occure more often then others and why you're baffled that I don't agree with you. Furthermore, what have I said at this site that gives you the impression that I want the lottery to go away? If you check, you'll find I'm on record on several occassions declaring that I play the lottery and feel the money I spend
Jul 26, 2010, 4:16 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum

Poll: Should we try a little harder to keep the discussions about all things Lottery?Reply
Anybodythat is outside the pail of buying QP s spends considerable timeevaluating and making decisions, while the QP artists have plenty oftime on their hands to run their mouths and BS about lotteryinsanity,... humorous polls. The greatest advocate of that is againstsystems and likes to run off and dis any member who has a systemsapproach. Why is he here? A: He has too much time on his hands and isonly a top poster because most of his posts are lottery drivel. He doesnot even see that his luck
Jul 5, 2010, 3:04 pm - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

Finding the weakest link?
Weakest link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcTFfiyrpOI I scouring through past weak workouts that presented poor results ..Example https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208895/1555700 just part of it flatlined. Being selectives about which workouts to use or not to use( because there are a slew of them out there) is the game. Sometimes I'll have the right root sum but wrong digits.This was an earlier problem in my postings;adjustments have been and still being made. I'm trying
Feb 18, 2010, 9:04 am - Blackapple - Lottery Discussion Forum

Vtrac search engine on Lottery PostReply
Very well. I inquired HOW as a new learner, any vtrac tool could help me pick numbers better and faster. Looking at a history is not the same as knowing how this tool would help me pick numbers better and faster. Glad to hear it s in the works along with a new book, but the How is still evasive. Studying something is not the same as getting results. I take for granted the better and faster equates to wins and not just less time spent. The poll leads one to believe a desired economy of effo
Feb 9, 2010, 7:04 pm - Delta Draw - Lottery Discussion Forum

LP Members: Just a Note: Encrypted Indirect lines On this Site...Reply
pumpi, I've seen some pretty wild things from you already..but this has got to take the cake. There are way more important things than imagining people are choosing screen names to put you down or make fun of you. Do you see anything in dr65? I'll tell you right now, I certainly didn't choose this to bother anyone else. If it was: pumpitup, would you see something in that? If so, that's a problem. I might be a bodybuilder....not out to get you. Some people's minds are on other things
Oct 25, 2009, 1:42 pm - dr65 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Never say neverReply
I have also used Gail Howard's system and won. Not the jackpot...yet. But I can tell you this: When I use her systems I nearly ALWAYS win SOMETHING and when I don't I win nothing. Basically Gail's system does exactly what she says. It reduces the odds of the game in your favor. I've won hundreds of dollars using her system and know that if I just keep playing and adjusting and improving my skill at using the system to pick my numbers I will win. I recently used her system to pick 5 of t
Oct 11, 2009, 3:30 am - Clubware - Lottery Discussion Forum

Pretend one or both of the sitiuations is happening to youReply
Do a little research on copyright and patent as no offense most of what you get is more urban legend than fact. http://www.copyright.gov/ If nothing else, read the FAQ it clearly talks about copyright and patent, how you copyright text not ideas, systems or discoveries. In my opinion you have to show loss in order to win compensation beyond a cease and desist order. For example, I may give information away on my web site, but I'm doing so to attract visitors. So even if I inten
Apr 7, 2009, 1:53 am - BobP - Lottery Discussion Forum