Search

Ohio Buckeye5..06/05/2004Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on June 07, 2004I shall cash in my two tickets tomorrow and use the $12 to play MegaMillions. When looking at MegaMillions 215 past drawings, I noticed that 80% of the numbers have hit 17 or more times and covered 85% of the 4 and 5 winning combinations and 68 of the last 100 drawings haven't included a number from the previous drawing. If I adjust the numbers pool accordingly, I would reduce it from 52 to 37 numbers making playing MegaMillions more like playing
Jun 7, 2004, 2:47 pm - MrSteel01 - Pick 5 Forum

Ohio Buckeye5..06/05/2004Reply
I shall cash in my two tickets tomorrow and use the $12 to play MegaMillions. When looking at MegaMillions 215 past drawings, I noticed that 80% of the numbers have hit 17 or more times and covered 85% of the 4 and 5 winning combinations and 68 of the last 100 drawings haven't included a number from the previous drawing. If I adjust the numbers pool accordingly, I would reduce it from 52 to 37 numbers making playing MegaMillions more like playing Buckeye5 and increase my odds of a match 5 by 5
Jun 7, 2004, 1:46 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

LS 1.8 screenshotReply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on June 06, 2004Sounds like Lottosynchronizer is evolving into a more traditional lottery program that uses the past histories and the most recent trends of the drawings to make its predictions than a theory of randomness that was the bases of its beginning. Does this mean it will work faster also?RJOhNo, it is not evolving into a more traditional lottery program. The theory behind it is still unchanged, the only thing that has changed is that the soft now takes
Jun 6, 2004, 12:46 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

Winning!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by rabbitfoot on June 04, 2004In different words, I repeat, if anyone had a surefire winning system a lottery would NEVER roll over. As proof that they don't, just take a look at the posted lottos to your left and double those amounts to account for the actual number of tickets sold- yet no one has won the jackpot. If you should win, it is no more than luck (no manner how you select your numbers).What make you think a surefire winning system would have to win one of th
Jun 5, 2004, 4:54 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Winning!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on June 04, 2004Quote: Originally posted by qutgnt on June 04, 2004I agree common sense is the odds are so long you need the heavens to be looking after you. If this WASNT THE CASE then there would be a lot of rich people on this site, not people satisfied to win a 40 dollar box bet once a week when they box 20 numbers a day . ARE THERE ANY LONG RUN WINNERS OUT THERE????People who come to this site and share their ideas about playing the lotteries and the news
Jun 5, 2004, 1:05 pm - MrSteel01 - Lottery Discussion Forum

June 4 MMReply
These are my picks for tonight. There are three groups. 1st group #1-#9, 2nd group #10(birth dates), and 3rd group #11-#18. I used different parameters to pick each group. All the numbers in the 1st group had been that position at least five time and in the 3rd group seven times. I posted the 3rd group in the prediction section. I was going to play the 1st or 3rd group with the 2nd group but I decided to play all 3 groups.FILE : MM060404 01 13 25 28 44 +32 11 19 29 41 51 +07
Jun 4, 2004, 10:38 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Winning!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by qutgnt on June 04, 2004I agree common sense is the odds are so long you need the heavens to be looking after you. If this WASNT THE CASE then there would be a lot of rich people on this site, not people satisfied to win a 40 dollar box bet once a week when they box 20 numbers a day . ARE THERE ANY LONG RUN WINNERS OUT THERE????People who come to this site and share their ideas about playing the lotteries and the news of their small winnings do it as a hobby. If any
Jun 4, 2004, 8:38 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

You would think that a lot of membersReply
Quote: Originally posted by Dowser on June 04, 2004Then it is useless knowledge. I don't see where the past numbers have anything to do with the future numbers. Knowledge is only useless if you can't or don't use it. Even knowing the next winning number in a lottery is useless if you don't buy a ticket. I remember reading someone post a couple of days ago about 678 being about ready to come in Ohio pick3 evening draws, but I don't play pick3 so I just watched and 678 didn't come in until tonig
Jun 4, 2004, 8:08 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Mathematics of LottoReply
Quote: Originally posted by dragon on May 26, 2004Are there people here in this forum who are such professional gamblers that make a living ........I would doubt if any professional gamblers would post their picks of systems at Lottery Post because if such existed, their systems would be too big or complex for the average players. Some one once said that Steve Player was a professional gambler and lottery player who sold his systems, but those systems were expensive to buy and play. Many post
May 28, 2004, 11:04 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

MegaMillions ..05/28/2004Reply
These are my picks for tonight's drawing.FILE : MM052804 09 13 29 37 41 +24 06 08 31 37 48 +01 06 22 26 34 50 +10 13 22 25 44 47 +38 12 15 36 40 48 +52 09 27 37 40 45 +05 03 08 18 42 47 +42 03 16 35 36 43 +26 13 15 31 39 47 +08 02 12 15 28 42 +29 14 21 34 37 48 +12 11 19 29 34 39 +09 10 12 16 41 42 +18 04 08 17 33 51 +35 03 09 26 40 50 +22 05
May 28, 2004, 10:28 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum