Search

Why they call it Scientific Games?Reply
Games like p3 p4 are difficult precisely because the total combination base is so small. The most recent numbers in the past one or two drawings cannot be just tossed out, like (sometimes) in jackpot games, because one number or another of them is always showing back up. Not knowing which one to keep drives up the combination count.
Sep 27, 2007, 6:46 am - time*treat - Lottery Discussion Forum

I can not figure this outReply
It took me a minute... here goes... what you are doing is counting up from that first number (in this case 7), and then you go up to or around to your second number (doesn't matter what that number is, we'll come back to that in a min) then you go up to or around to your third number (doesn't matter what that number is either, we'll come back to that in a min too). Finally, you take your third number and go back around to your first number. In a base 10 system, no matter how man
Sep 7, 2007, 3:22 pm - time*treat - Mathematics Forum

Capitalizing On Repeat NumbersReply
the 927 combination hit in other states as well. Yep, 927 hit straight in Texas on May 31 and boxed on June 2, but you didn't predict that number until June 5. I'm not using a base. But when Paint1 pointed out a discrepancy, you told them: Paint1, the descrepancy is in whether or not you checked off the box that will combine Illinois Iowa . Deflating all Pick 3 results for June 5, 2007 Illinois and Iowa results combined (only included once) Results: 48 Tier 4 927(792,
Jun 7, 2007, 1:21 am - Stack47 - Lottery Systems Forum

how and when did you first start playing the lottery?Reply
Justxploring For me it was when I was stationed in Germany, 1970-1973. It was the Hessen Lotto, a 6/49 game with a bonus number (not a MM or PB format, but a bonus prize for 5 of 6 + 1, so they drew 7 numbers). The sevent number was the Zusatspielen The drawings were on Saturday nights on German TV. Neat way of learning to count in German! I didn't live on base, I lived in a German household in town, and a neighbor down the street, the local German TV weath
Apr 7, 2007, 6:40 pm - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

the proven lotto systemReply
I've always thought the ideal system for me would be one that predicted one 3 digit straight number within the next 90 draws but I've never found the correct base for the same reason you said: tendencies change .
Feb 13, 2007, 4:34 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Systems Forum

Odds/Number Of TicketsReply
But are we not ruling out the possibility of duplicating the combination? I guess in a perfect world we could expect a different combination every draw until the total number of possible combinations is reached and then it starts over. However, we know that does not happen or seem to happen in the real world. Odds in my opinion are purely a guesstimate of what we think the possibility of performance will be. Some odds makers have told me that indeed over time the total number of appearance
Nov 30, 2006, 3:33 am - floridian - Mathematics Forum

My new "VTRAC Series Filters".Reply
What exactly do you want it to do? Setting up a spreadsheet where all you do is input the desired actual number and the spreadsheet converts the numbers to VTrac is easy. Giving you various tracking tools is also easy. I have most, if not all of that already done. I have determined skip tracking just doesn't work (at least not on GA numbers). If you can give me a better understanding, perhaps I can help you. The base system I currently have already tracks and gives the winning number most
Sep 18, 2006, 6:06 pm - SirMetro - Lottery Systems Forum

Best state lottery websiteReply
I've been to most all of them to i like the ones that allow you to search their data base for numbers by inputting them in their search feature. i also like the ones that give you the totals of amount of winners for pick 3/4/5 games etc and what the payout's were. as far a web sites go i guess it about the person who designs it, the platform they use and what the boss wants the web site to do. many lottery's might want the economy web site while others might want the whole nine yards. And th
Jul 6, 2006, 3:23 pm - four4me - Lottery Discussion Forum

No delusion-100% winning methodReply
Pacattack helped to realize that my epxlanation odf DSUM may have been too convulted. Here's a brief summary attempt. Hey Pacattack. Much respect. I wish I could. I'll try. 1. take the last draw. 2. do a wrap of that number. 3. Use DSUM. Down 1 digit, Stay the same, Up one digit, and miror the digit. There are only 64 possible combinations and DSUM covers them all. You will find many duplicates 4. Formula is: 1. DDD 2. DDS 3. DDU 4. DDM
May 19, 2006, 1:32 am - Kola - Pick 3 Forum

No delusion-100% winning methodReply
Hey Pacattack. Much respect. I wish I could. I'll try. 1. take the last draw. 2. do a wrap of that number. 3. Use DSUM. Down 1 digit, Stay the same, Up one digit, and miror the digit. There are only 64 possible combinations and DSUM covers them all. You will find many duplicates 4. Formula is: 1. DDD 2. DDS 3. DDU 4. DDM 5. DSD 6. DSS 7. DSU 8. DSM 9. DUD 10. DUS 11. DUU 12. DUM 13. DMD 14. DMS 15. DMU 16.
May 19, 2006, 1:17 am - Kola - Lottery Systems Forum