Search

Pick 5 or 5 ball lotteryReply
I had the same pay off problem, RJOH. I have been doing some averaging and found out, so far, that in this five ball game, the total sum average range is around 63-116 in general and these range totals so far go back to January 2001. The exceptions that I encountered roughly came to +/- 5 over the average I just wrote about. What I am seeing is a bulk of digits staying within a bell-curve. I came across this information while surfing and decided to have a look at our game and the information was
Oct 31, 2002, 11:21 pm - Teufellj - Pick 5 Forum

Pick 5 or 5 ball lotteryReply
RJOH,I'm aware of what and how you affirm items and I know that you don't step on anothers' forum or ways of doing things. The last comment on the past message retort was my way of thinking out loud, if you will. No one in my estimation, is any better or lower than anybody else, period! You were right to point out how other games were crowding the areas of interest things like that do tend to get vexing when you want info. I like the way the games are handled now, too! My thinking cap has bee
Oct 26, 2002, 3:42 pm - Teufellj - Pick 5 Forum

Pick 5 or 5 ball lotteryReply
To TeufelljI wasn't playing down the Maybell forum or pick3 players, but pointing out that if you played the pick5 or jackpot games you had to read a lot of postings before you found a posting about a pick5 or jackpot game. I agree with curt777 that you have to use your gray matter when picking your numbers, but software or systems can help, for example Gordon of the UK made a statement in the Lottery Discussion Section about using prime numbers to pick your numbers,within seconds of reading hi
Oct 26, 2002, 1:09 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

Prime numbers 6 from 49Reply
Your observations are interesting, but have you check that same file using numbers 1-14? I checked those prime numbers with the Ohio649P files and the prime numbers matched 6=0,5=1,4=11,3=52 and checked the numbers 1-14 and matched 6=0,5=3,4=12,3=39. The numbers 1-14 actually would have produced more winning combinations than the prime numbers. I concluded that the fourteen prime numbers in the Ohio lottery are no better than any other fourteen numbers. Your UK's lotteries may have bias that
Oct 26, 2002, 12:31 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Pick 5 or 5 ball lottery
Hey there folks,What has happened to the discussions of this game? Other than the discourses between Larry, RJOH and myself, does no one have any insites to report? You might have an idea that bears looking into.Your idea may sound stupid to you but how else are any of us including you, going to beat this game and win a little cash? Christmas is just around the corner, wouldn't YOU like to have more in Your pocket? I sure would! Come on and give a little input!Teufellj
Oct 23, 2002, 6:44 am - Teufellj - Pick 5 Forum

Mega Millions 10/22/2002Reply
These are my picks for tonight's drawing 10/22/02 08 | 14 | 24 | 25 | 34 +06 21 | 31 | 37 | 38 | 52 +24 15 | 16 | 29 | 46 | 47 +12 09 | 10 | 11 | 30 | 42 +17 17 | 19 | 33 | 41 | 43 +18 03 | 12 | 18 | 26 | 36 +09 20 | 32 | 39 | 40 | 45 +25 22 | 23 | 28 | 48 | 49 +02 04 | 05 | 27 | 35 | 50 +16 01 | 07 | 13 | 34 | 51 +20 11 | 13 | 17 | 25 | 38 +21 05 | 24 | 28 | 29 | 30 +08 21 | 35 | 40 | 43 | 48 +04 18 | 26 | 33 | 37 | 44 +03 15 | 19 | 31 | 41 | 45 +23 06 | 12 | 14 |
Oct 22, 2002, 5:04 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Buckeye5 10/17/02Reply
Hi RJOH,I was just writing something to add to this message board and AOL timed out on me. This outfit is getting a little too urinatingly unsavory for my time and money. They blew about 12 minutes of typing,@#$%!!. Any way...I will check out sedertree's program again, maybe I missed something. I have been working with Io Salius' site and have almost concluded that the statement of less numbers in a matrix or program is bearing fruit. The problem on hand is there seems to be a recycling time
Oct 19, 2002, 1:25 pm - Teufellj - Pick 5 Forum

Buckeye5 10/17/02Reply
To Teufellj,I tried something similiar and the same thing happen. I matched 3 and 1+bonus for $10. The range of the winning draw was 41 so maybe I will try starting out with small ranges and assuming I will match 2 or 3 with my first few picks and expand the range up to 50 as I pick additional combinations. It will take more than 20 combinations so I may have to save up until I can afford to play more combinations. Mean while I'm going to test that theory and see if I've stubble upon sometim
Oct 18, 2002, 8:27 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

George Sedertree Where are you?Reply
RJOh,Yes, the Pick-5 Matrix + (and theory) will work the same as the current Pick-3 and Pick-4 software. I will no doubt have to break it off and create another software product for the larger games.The current P3/P4 product is pushing the 5MB envelope. It wouldn't surprise me if Version 2.0 tips the scales in excess of 7MB.I'm pretty much finished with the User Interface of Version 2.0 right now. I will be posting a screenshot later to hopefully receive some feedback from the regular lotte
Oct 18, 2002, 5:37 am - Sedertree - Lottery Discussion Forum

Buckeye5 10/15/02Reply
Hello RJOH,seems you and I are in the same boat, we both appear to have conversations with ourselves! Anyhow,...I was toying with the Pick 3 Ohio and started to make some good monetary advances with an idea that is bearing fruit and thought maybe that this idea could be incorporated into the Buckeye 5. I will start a tryout for the 16th Wednsday. I am using the last five winning sets of digits. Highest digits to the lowest, ignoring pairs or more of same digits in the count. This would/should gi
Oct 15, 2002, 11:44 pm - Teufellj - Pick 5 Forum