Search

Run Your Lottery Pools With Ease and Efficiency.Reply
Before I retired, I use to join lottery pools with my associates and the one thing we didn't have was a good contract agreement that everyone understood. When we won over $1000,some of the questions were, was the 28% too much or too little to cover the taxes for the person cashing in the ticket, how much was to be distributed and how much was to be rolled over if the jackpot was not won. If you wanted to play and didn't pay and the pool lost, did you still owe anything or if the pool won, could
Aug 4, 2001, 10:23 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Ohio Super Lotto at $ 54 Million Help!!!!!Reply
Dear Lucky RJOh: Online terminals were invented for traditional Lotto- and numbers-type games, where part of the fun is guessing which number(s) will be drawn. I'm all for letting players having the OPTION of buying quick-picks . I also have no problem with players WINNING an automatic QP , e.g. matching 2 numbers in Hoosier Lotto. However, Ohio KICKER should have instead been (in one form or another) a scratch-ticket game. The Pennsylvania Super-6 game unfortunately lets players pick no mor
Jul 9, 2001, 8:51 am - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Ohio Super Lotto at $ 54 Million Help!!!!!Reply
Dear RJOh: Why does Ohio still have this silly Kicker game, which actually is no relation to your 6/49, except you MUST play Ohio Lotto if you wish to try Kicker , which costs an extra $1 (per ticket, not game.) Michigan had a Zinger , and, Virginia thankfully dropped its six-digit game when their Lotto adapted its current format last year. If the Ohio Lottery likes it so much, it ought to be a truly separate game. In case you're wondering, the Powerball gimmick PowerPlay was much better t
Jul 8, 2001, 4:52 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

BG top picks of 40 or more drawsa backReply
RJOh answered my post and gave me the date. I am not sure I have any results to share at this point. It is just beginning to come together but then who knows, my grand scheme may be and most probably is . a fluke. I do note that a strong number of current calls come from definte sets of past calls. Using numbers surrounding numbers called about 17 draws ago helps my odds. I seem to be hitting in the 20% lately but close doesn't count. Need the big one!
Jun 18, 2001, 3:56 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Great article about 1980 Pennsylvania riggingReply
Dear RJOh: Well, my proposal would give you a MUCH BETTER chance to win $5 than the OH 6/49 or the 6/51 Mich. Millions. The current PA game usually pays just $2 for a three-number match...and remember the Super-6 automatic quick-picks! (I don't mind getting an automatic quick pick as a _prize_; example: NY Take Five, but it isn't quite fair to have to BUY the ticket and not be able to select all your numbers.) Super-6 Lotto will soon be three years old-PA just didn't think this concept out v
Jun 1, 2001, 1:47 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Ohio needs Big Game (or Powerball)Reply
RJOh, you have some good points. The 1:450 or so chance of winning a prize as small as FIVE DOLLARS is ridiculous. (Don't ask me why the new 6/49 Michigan Millions also has this token $5 prize.) One other major fault with the Ohio Lotto game is this Kicker - it's not just Quick Pick-only , but, you MUST play the unrelated Lotto in order to play Kicker. If you want to win $100K in Ohio, you should try Buckeye 5. But, the biggest beef I have with your 6/49 is the different way of computing cas
May 14, 2001, 11:18 am - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Mo Big Money Picks for BIG GAME 4/6/01
Hot damn...yours truley had a 12.50% Lucky had a 11.49% RJoH had 8.33% and Todd had a 7.77%....AND I HAD A $5.00 WINNER! Boy that 14 never even came into any type of play in the systems I study...looks like we all had a problem with that #.I really believe I have a even better group this time:7-27-38-40-48->156-7-12-38-40->1511-15-38-41-50->3310-11-39-40-42->338-12-13-15-20->3322-25-39-41-49->2220-22-38-42-48->2219-25-30-39-40->222-3-6-19-20->133-6-11-28-30->136-11-
Apr 4, 2001, 11:57 am - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Maddog's 2018 MM & PB Challenge StatsReply
Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking name 0+1 name 1+1 name 2+1 name 3+0 name 3+1 name 4+0 name 4+1 name 5+0 artist77 $60 konane $68 magma $68 cdanat $61 n.y.debbie $600 rman313 $2,000 cbr$ $1,000,000 rcbbuckeye $52 cdanat $60 old eagle
Jan 1, 2019, 10:09 am - fja - Jackpot Games Forum

Maddog's 2018 MM & PB Challenge StatsReply
Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking 694 name 0+1 name 1+1 name 2+1 name 3+0 name 3+1 name 4+0 name 4+1 name 5+0 artist77 19 konane 16 magma 8 cdanat 7 n.y.debbie 4 rman313 2 cbr$ 1 rcbbuckeye 19 cdanat 15 old eagle 7 artist77 6
Jan 1, 2019, 10:05 am - fja - Jackpot Games Forum

Maddog's 2018 MM & PB Challenge StatsReply
Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking name 0+1 name 1+1 name 2+1 name 3+0 name 3+1 name 4+0 artist77 $58 konane $60 magma $68 cdanat $61 n.y.debbie $600 rman313 $2,000 rcbbuckeye $50 cdanat $56 cdanat $57 artist77 $48 rman313 $300 cdanat $2,000 magma $46 artist77
Dec 1, 2018, 9:34 am - fja - Jackpot Games Forum