Search

The "8" phenomenonReply
NADA!!!! Besides I rarely play the pick 3 or the pick 4 games. PB or MM's for me. My state of Delaware has nothing but computerized drawings! And I REFUSE to play an already rigged game!
Aug 14, 2008, 9:52 am - BaristaExpress - Lottery Discussion Forum

Tenn. proposal for real lottery drawings withdrawnReply
I agree. Plus, I wonder if they are going to keep putting it off in the hopes that people will just forget about it and accept computerized drawings.
Apr 30, 2008, 3:38 pm - ThatScaryChick - Lottery News

Tenn. proposal for real lottery drawings withdrawnReply
I see this not as a blow to those who play in Tennessee but to a blow for all across the nation who resist the turn to computerized drawings. This could have been another card in our hand to play, but now it's just another sign that there's seemingly nothing we can do to stop it
Apr 30, 2008, 2:58 pm - JustFrozen - Lottery News

Tennessee Lottery computerized drawings under suspicion againReply
i bet tennesse loses a lot of money b/c they don't use ping pong balls. i check the website every now and then and never see a lot of winners. if nc started to use computerized drawings I would drive to va more often
Apr 15, 2008, 11:18 am - JordanT1021 - Lottery News

Delaware Getting Hot LottoReply
I like Hot Lotto, but if they add the sizzler here I won't be paying extra money to play it. The reason, it's computerized. I do play once in a while, but I still don't trust the computerized drawings enough to add an extra buck to each line.
Jan 13, 2008, 11:34 am - ThatScaryChick - Lottery Discussion Forum

POLL 2 of 3: Switching to computerized drawingsReply
''Computerized drawings not fair to the average lottrey player'' . Numbers selected by the computer is manupulated . This means the computer will pick numbers with few winners. They win and gain, we loose and and there is no hope really .Once again not fair not balanced. This is my opinion. I do not particulaly play computerized games. Ah ?
Nov 14, 2007, 2:23 am - bigato1010 - Lottery Discussion Forum

rebecca paul needs to be firedReply
pat,mrs. paul switched tennessee to computerized drawings.believe me you would not like that and neither would most georgia players.she has ruined the lottery here in tennessee.....
Nov 12, 2007, 5:26 pm - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum

rebecca paul needs to be firedReply
guru i notice you are always championing the cause of the computerized drawings.you must win pretty often up there in the great state of indiana.i bet you hit the pick 3 and pick 4 with no problem right?
Nov 2, 2007, 2:09 am - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum

Tenn. Lottery asks firms to pay cost for errorReply
I made the comment because the Hoosier lottery has lost its integrity. Yeah, it has computerized drawings; however, they also had that instant ticket incident. You know the one where a lottery official leaked info on where a winning instant ticket was going to be sold and they split the money? That's a loss of integrity. I'm sorry if that offends you but that's the way I see it.
Oct 31, 2007, 7:19 pm - Tnplayer805 - Lottery News

Tenn. players picked up on new odds before lottery revealed glitchReply
The Pick 4 was a better deal there, close to breakeven so an algorithm that simply tracked frequent digits period could have pushed it up enough to make long-term profit (theoretically speaking). Here's food for thought: at what payout ratio (if any) would you be willing to accept computerized drawings? I think at 80-90% I might but no way at 50%!
Oct 28, 2007, 11:19 pm - LckyLary - Lottery News