Search

If All 80,000 Members of LP Dedicated to Systems for PB and Pick6 We will Win it EverydayReply
thanks for the work RJOh, im willing to put on $10 towards this when the pot gets over $200M. its either 5 games if i play online, or 10 if i get someone to buy my ticket, i have pals in usa, ill talk to them this week. id rather bag 10 lines and forgoe %10 to ticket buyer. guess i will find out how good a friend they are of it wins what im saying is count me in for 5-10 numbers when pot goes over 200 mill;
Aug 26, 2010, 10:27 am - savagegoose - Lottery Discussion Forum

If All 80,000 Members of LP Dedicated to Systems for PB and Pick6 We will Win it EverydayReply
No hard feelings, RJOh. Like I said, I just want to win. As for quick picks, that's pointless. I'f I played QP, I wouldn't be on this board. What's the point? Now, joker17, that's exactly what I was getting at in my other thread. In, fact, your post is the most sensible thing on the plate. It's what I've shifted my thinking toward. Consecutive Buildup is the name of the game. Master the easiest game first, then move on.
Aug 21, 2010, 3:04 pm - Luminus - Lottery Discussion Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
the players using systems that don't work that hide the ones with systems that do work. RJOh, the more I see you post regarding this topic, the better I can see that you understand how things really work around here. Nice post...especially this excerpt. L.L.
Aug 15, 2010, 9:14 am - Lucky Loser - Lottery Discussion Forum

Fooled by RandomnessReply
Rjoh, It wasn't necessary to bring that up. I wished those days never existed. I tried in vain to get Todd to delete the entire crappy post and he whipped me a new one. I learn well though. I won't be putting out posts with intelligence approaches to the game because the atmosphere can get pretty hostile and toxic. People wanna believe your knowledge of expertise is not much greater than theirs and the minute they're convinced how amatuer their game knowledge is, it become offensive to them t
Aug 14, 2010, 5:26 pm - Mega-ThinkTank - Lottery Systems Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
RJOH That doesn't mean every player with a system has that advantage. (True I wasn't saying otherwise just like with quick-picks some players win using them while others do not and the same goes with systems and strategies but for different reasons not everyone is capable of using a system properly just like with software I've hit using a program that another player from this forum had and they weren't able too win using it.With quick-picks it's based on the odds if your chances are
Aug 14, 2010, 1:00 pm - LotteryTechInc - Lottery Discussion Forum

Fooled by RandomnessReply
Good try, Critc. This is why I wanted someone from a foreign country to give me their end numbers and Ill produced the winning whole numbers. With the American games ( Mega and PwrBall) of course anyone can do a simply search (like RJOH said) and get the numbers. What Im trying to prove is how credible my method is......I tell y'all what...... go back through the years, I dont care what year, and get me another 5 digits end number and I will stay on line and try to produce my 5 number se
Aug 13, 2010, 1:00 am - Mega-ThinkTank - Lottery Systems Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
RJOH Then you made the point why should anyone have to prove anything since everyone were just posting their ideas for pick numbers and selling a system to do it (You mean I made the point that if a player is trying too sell a system or strategy then and only then does he have too PROVE it too everyone but if he's not he doesn't have to.Most players in here play for fun,for themself,entertainment,recreation etc... so no reason too prove anything if they won using a particular system o
Aug 11, 2010, 11:39 am - LotteryTechInc - Lottery Discussion Forum

POLL - On The Whole Do The Lotteries Provide Truly Random Numbers?Reply
RJOh, Are you saying, then, that employing betting strategies that increase the number of hits for the smaller prizes will CONSEQUENTLY increase your chances of Hitting the Jackpot? If so, how? --Jimmy
Aug 8, 2010, 7:54 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
Well, no I don't write programs, and all those formulas you wrote don't mean anything to me. I only checked the results for this year because that's all I had time to do this morning before work. 4 draws out of 186 draws is about 2%. It's a simple matter (but time consuming) to just go back through the past draws and count. If I have time I'll go back farther, but I can safely say that 3 successive numbers in a draw in Tx Cash 5 does not happen frequently...certainly not frequent enough that I w
Aug 6, 2010, 11:08 pm - rcbbuckeye - Lottery Discussion Forum

Idea: Why not predict Pick4 by weeks..Reply
Wow...hee hee.. I didn't realize he was talking about the prediction features here at the LP. I thought he was talking about predictions in general. I feel like an idiot.... Thanx for clearing that up Rjoh...
Aug 6, 2010, 8:41 pm - joker17 - Lottery Systems Forum