Search

Same lottery numbers win game twiceReply
Okay, it happened and I hope that it will happen again when somone can win big, thus it would have to rollover a couple of months, then BINGO!Then computerized drawings will be eliminated
Feb 14, 2006, 8:42 pm - mylollipop - Lottery News

Do You Think You'll Win The Lottery?
Everyone here keeps talking about how computerized drawings are rigged, and how they're determined to win the lottery, but who here really thinks they will win it someday? Seriously, who here really thinks that they are going to become a millionaire through matching a certain 6 numbers?
Feb 10, 2006, 10:39 pm - DoctorEw220 - Lottery Discussion Forum

a reason to be concerned...computer drawsReply
I'm not going to be happy if all the games get computerized. That makes more jackpot winners and less interest in these games. I wonder when did Hot Lotto went to computerized drawings?
Feb 10, 2006, 2:09 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery Discussion Forum

At what point (matrix) would you not playReply
It is very possible a lottery commission may monitor this board. Hopefully that would get them to drop computerized drawings if they have them.
Feb 7, 2006, 12:01 pm - ryanm - Lottery Discussion Forum

CA SLPReply
Here's the problem JimmySand9, CA's population is at 37+ million and CA SLP Jackpot odds are at 41.5 million to 1. That's why CA should keep the 5+1 bonus game. If they go back to 6/49 or 6/51, more people will keep winning. I want computerized drawings OUT. I would suggest CA SLP increase the odds of winning the jackpot by increasing a few WBs, but keep odds of winning at around 1 in 25.
Feb 3, 2006, 2:30 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery Discussion Forum

Is any State Run Lottery Honest?Reply
I don't think state lotteries care, most of the board directors treat it as a temp job to academia. If they did care they would have NON computerized drawings and more care with scratch tickets. Personnally I don't think any system where the winning tickets are pre-printed can be 100% safe.
Jan 31, 2006, 2:55 am - dvdiva - Lottery Discussion Forum

Indiana lottery rigger faces 50-year penaltyReply
That's why this is so devastating. The Hoosier Lottery would go a long way with the credibility of their games if they would dump the computerized drawings. It may help people forget this regrettable incident.
Jan 30, 2006, 11:44 am - Todd - Lottery News

Indiana lottery rigger faces 50-year penaltyReply
The General Assembly has said this is so serious it needs to be an A felony, Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi said. If the public loses confidence in the lottery, there will be no lottery. [Editor: Using the same logic, why don't they get rid of the computerized drawings?]But at the same time, the lottery KNOWS where the winning tickets are being sent ?
Jan 30, 2006, 11:32 am - DoubleDown - Lottery News

Sign the petition - eliminate computerized drawings!Reply
thats what this petition is all about.in my eyes this thing would be as huge for the lottery as anything i've ever seen if it comes to pass.it would probably bring a whole new wave of players who got disgusted and quit when the computerized drawings started taking over.....
Jan 30, 2006, 6:26 am - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum

Sign the petition - eliminate computerized drawings!Reply
here in kansas,,the same pick 3 numbers came out 3 nights in a row in exact order....wait...computer error.....were sorry......we never did get an explanation what the error was.....these computerized drawings are so fixed its unbelieveable....
Jan 30, 2006, 1:03 am - liedtoinkansas - Lottery Discussion Forum