Search

Predicting winning numbers? Fact or fiction?Reply
Been testing and building on theses books for, don't know how many hours now. Thought I'd post a little on where it's at. See if the thoughts of actually pulling off a win might improve a little. Will start with this. These aren't big wins, but wins nonetheless. The two above where before I've dwindled down the options with further testing. These 1 digit offs are KILLING me. The ones that pop up and are kind of known to be coming is a good sign it's getting closer. With a few picks,
Aug 13, 2019, 1:57 am - Greenfox - Lottery Discussion Forum

Cycles - Interesting NumbersReply
So I have again spent the better part of all night checking and rechecking my calcs.... And for the life of me I can not find an error. In all honesty what I did was based on a hunch, an intuitive guess that went against my normal logic process, and once again by following my intuition it came up with a result that I can not fully comprehend. I keep telling myself this can't be right, surely not, I've made a mistake somewhere, something is amiss. I still need to keep digging back th
Nov 21, 2018, 8:41 pm - Hydromaln7 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lotto 7/35Reply
The odds don't change because you change the way the numbers are wheeled / generated. While your playing from a reduced matrix, the actual game still plays from the 7-35 pool. The odds that the winning set will fall within the reduced pool is 6,724,520/1,046,520=6.426. On average you can expect the winning set to come from the 1046520 lines around 1 in every 6.426 games. To calculate the lower prizes could be done but they too would be conditional. I have a old tool that calculat
Sep 25, 2018, 11:47 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

Q for the regulars/Vets: Do you set aside time each day/week to work on lottery games ?Reply
I work one of My Systems Every Day. I have been doing this since 2115. I used to set up Excel Sheets for about every idea posted on the Forum and back test them to see if they worked. Most LP Systems worked for a while but not over the Long Haul. I began with Super Lotto Plus (CA). I built a Monster that Tracked about 100 Columns of Data for Every Draw. It included a Sheet that calculated the current values for each Number from the Historical Data Columns. Each Column became a Code That coul
Apr 21, 2018, 4:25 pm - AllenB - Lottery Discussion Forum

Flower Petals in the PoolReply
Flower petals in the pool (Normalized) Method 1: 3-0-5/315 Method 2: 7-5-2 Method 3: 1-6-4 Method 4: 7-0-0/100 Method 5: 7-8-5 Method 6: 7-9-6 Flower petals in the water of the pool (Normalized) Method 1: 3-6-3-7 Method 2: 2-4-1-8/7481 Method 3: 0-0-4-5 Method 4: 9-1-5-4/1445 Method 5: 4-1-4-1/4140 Method 6: 5-1-5-8 Keep calm float on
Oct 9, 2017, 9:49 am - collegem$ - Mystical Forum

P4> Every draw has a corresponding Base stringReply
Lets keep prediction picks to max of 4 sets. Lets focus on prize ratio for a comprehensive waging strategy. A Box bet pays $200 A combo bet (Exact) pays 5k or 2.5k) Suggested Time frame is 10 draws. Waging Box bet: $2 per set will be $8 a draw for cost $80 for possible prize of $400 Waging Straight: start with 50 cents, $48 per draw will cost $480 for possible prize of $2,500. Prediction Ideal: Every draw event starts with a ten member pool, we're trying to guess the CURRE
Oct 1, 2017, 7:04 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

RL's DMP-HT lottery tool is ready for downloadReply
At the very beginning back on 2003 to 2005 or so, I noticed that I could not analyze a long list of past winning numbers and that I could not take hours trying to figure out which winning number might come out next. And yes, I saw that I wanted to predict the very next winning number and not some other future winning number that who knows when it might come out. And it had to be a more or less accurate and quick prediction, I did not have all day. One or a very few numbers just would no
May 14, 2017, 7:44 am - MonEl - Lottery Systems Forum

Trough Root sum Master and the absence of 01 & 89 pairReply
Remove duplicates/repeats from Tiers 1 2 thus 626 870 010 556 521 044 764 793 461 425 231 541 487 946 380 130 983 591 819 307 737 667 084 988 343 987 751 539 693 834 815 995 347 260 022 265 410 112 497 557 970 508 796 498 244 939 055 605 111 775 362 900 601 422 797 558 554 590 357 488 128 277 510 642 598 214 553 344 237 447 957 383 872 530 836 868 867 373 594 094 294 088 971 722 414 435 582 504 259 118 430 174 587 057 283 991 704 444 523 007 019 012 067 346 319 869 392 548 566 017 567 018
May 12, 2017, 9:21 am - Blackapple - Lottery Systems Forum

Illinois lawmakers call for investigation into lotteryReply
I'm so glad that people are starting to catch on. If you want some insight in how this is pulled off I can tell you how they accomplish this in Indiana which is just as corrupt as Illinois is. The part of the scheme that everyone is missing is the new games and ticket distribution methods. How they are able to accomplish their so called Low performance sales numbers is that they target an abundant amount of new tickets for release to purposely pull tickets from distribution to artificial
Dec 15, 2016, 12:38 pm - Zebekyia - Lottery News

Bulk filtering uisng historyReply
lottoswe I talked about this type of filtering back in the early days of DMP and your correct, it works well. The problem is that I need to eliminate numbers from the pool. The benefits IMHO, out-weight the risk as removing one number from the pool reduces the matrix by 73,815 lines in a 5-39 matrix. Each additional number removed has less of a effect on the overall reduction. If we select any 5 numbers randomly to play the odds are very good that none of them will show in the next
Nov 23, 2016, 11:03 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Lottery Systems Forum