Search

I think I just may have cracked the p-3 codeReply
That's exactly what happens. When you start with 1 in the fibonacci sequence that's just a starting point; by step 2 you have the number that it's suppose to be; by step 3 you have gone past it selecting a lower number again on the chart; step 4 is just a duplicate of step 3; step 5...; step 6..., but my excel sheet only goes through the 1st 4 times. Draw is 394: Front pair is 39 Step 1: Put 1 into the system, find number just lower than 39, then subtract: 39-33=6 then add 6+1(original ste
Oct 13, 2012, 3:22 am - Pogo - Lottery Systems Forum

Take5 NYReply
Thats great. Keep the money momentum!! Btw i was not offended at all by your comments. i am glad that i was able to teach you something. i have been pushing my charts for a long time now. But now its time to step back. I have to rewrite some charts because there is too much copy and pasting and switching from one worksheet to the next. Basically a lot of wasted time. And dont let the term fibbies confuse you. I got a little carried away with that. But when i used to have simpler charts I woul
Sep 8, 2012, 5:07 am - LottoBoner - Pick 5 Forum

what is your thoughts on randomness is there structure even in chaos?Reply
i just got 3/5 two times in a 6 game wheel (my own created wheel) in take five on an offical draw... was it pure luck! nonsense...it was smart luck tm i just used the fibs... 0d - 26 1d - 23 2d - 11 the other fibs in the draw were 11 16 so the fibonacci sequence thus becomes...0 - 1 - 2 - 11 - 16 (you kinda have to use your imagination) something that many people on LP are lacking. i do like your theory on predraws... gail howard said in her book... i dont track pre-
Apr 14, 2012, 11:47 pm - LottoBoner - Lottery Discussion Forum

Fibonacci NumbersReply
I don't know where this is going to, but I haven't seen any working stuff yet. It always stays as fuzzy as it was written. Fibonacci row was used for betting, for raising the bet mainly, not for guessing the numbers. When you lost, then you didn't win. Over. You can win a pick 6 with numbers 1 2 3 4 5 6. That's how it is, and as many want to be so smart not to play it, there might be just one winner. Any combination has the same chance. Not every combination will show during yo
Apr 12, 2012, 1:51 pm - SergeM - Lottery Discussion Forum

About phiReply
Thank you. I think you're right. Whichever method you choose it's good as long as it can predict the outcome right. You gave me some ideas just by giving above reply by the way. The numbers have their own language indeed. But I think, whatever language it is, it's always the same. You just need right dictionary to decode it. I'm working with jackpot lotteries. Especialy with one ball drawings, where you can find certain patterns the quickiest way. Same goes with pick 3 I thin
Nov 2, 2011, 6:42 pm - uomatko - Lottery Systems Forum

Plus 1/Minus 1 on VtracsReply
I don't understand this post, Fibonacci. I figured out that 154 is the Vtrac number for 048. But where did the following numbers come from : 254 114 155 554 144 153 ??? If you add a +1 to (1)54 = 254 If you subtract -1 from 15(4) = 153 If you add +1 to 15(4) = 155 If you subtract -1 from 1(5)4 = 144 Am I doing this correctly ??? Is this what you did to get these numbers: 254 114 155 554 144 153 ??? According to your formula : +1 and -1 on each digit, I don't see where the 114 a
Apr 8, 2010, 4:12 pm - destinycreation - Lottery Systems Forum

ARe Hackers 1 step ahead in the lotto??I always had a hunch..Reply
That's ridiculous, for one, the draw lotteries use physical machines to draw their balls. The most common being the gravity type where carefully stored sets of measured and weighed balls are agitated by paddles rotating in opposite directions and when a door is open at the bottom of the device, a measured number of balls exit the machine for display. There's no random number generator involved. Cracking a RNG seed is pointless without knowing which RNG algorithm is being used, many simple RNG al
Dec 22, 2009, 5:56 pm - jwhou - Lottery Discussion Forum

Pick 3/4 Business PartnerReply
Hi joker17. I'd like to ask you to do just one little thing for me, okay. Just one thing. Go back and read where I started this course when responding to Fibonacci. Then, read the response I made to ca-dreamin' regarding exactly what I'm doing by using all theses examples and where they're derived from. At that point, it should become very clear to you that I'm only using these systems for demonstration purposes only and to expose the inefficiency of them. I understand, very well, the scope o
Jun 28, 2009, 2:34 am - Matchmaker - Lottery Discussion Forum

Pick 3/4 Business PartnerReply
Miss Dreamin', I did what I agreed to do. I said I'd post some numbers and play as close to the LP line limit as I could because I'm just a plain member. Basically, I sef-imposed my own line here in an effort to try playing on the same court if you will. Now, when it comes to money, I'm not trying to lose it and you're darn right that I played a much better set because my money was on the line. Do you find something wrong with that? Does that not make sense? Is this not a good business decisi
Jun 22, 2009, 12:22 pm - Matchmaker - Lottery Discussion Forum

Pick 3/4 Business PartnerReply
I suppose I've made quite a few enemies here. In just the last couple of hours or so, I've watched the views to this very topic climb from 10,121 to the now 10,331 while the replies remained virtually unchanged. To be perfectly frank, I had more fun being the bad newbee who was dubbed to know it all. I got more feedback, challenges, and the bashing was the best part of all. Now that I've accepted the challenge of posting predictions, everything has changed. Though I haven't matched anything y
Jun 17, 2009, 11:29 pm - Matchmaker - Lottery Discussion Forum