Search

"Taping" in advance & Conspiracy TheoriesReply
But you also don't know what's going on inside the black box as well. Computerized drawings take the suspense thrill out of a big win. If you don't have that, then why play?
Nov 7, 2005, 2:37 pm - NoCompLotto! - Lottery Discussion Forum

Another one digit miss...Reply
Which of course further proves my point of being closer with computerized drawings than balls. Probably why I prefer balls, I usually lose outright! It is less painful that way.
Nov 2, 2005, 2:00 pm - sirbrad - Pick 4 Forum

Hooser Lottery=it doesnt computeReply
Jeff,Sorry the losing streak continues, and that the legislators in Indiana refuse to do anything about the computerized drawings. It would seem the lottery commission has tight reigns on the government. Money tends to do that.Love your sig - FUN IS BAD ----causes Bankruptcy - sums it up pretty well, I think.
Oct 21, 2005, 9:18 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

What is your favorite lottery game?Reply
MM, no stupid cap also since I would play in WA state - no state income tax. Other than that Euromillions or the Canadian 6/49 games. I also liked Quinto but haven't bought very many tickets since they switched to computerized drawings.
Oct 19, 2005, 1:01 am - dvdiva - Lottery Discussion Forum

"Taping" in advance & Conspiracy TheoriesReply
The problem with your conspiracy scenario is that someone would eventually go to the media with a rejected payslip and cause the scandal to blow up. The scenario would also require the lottery software download the winning numbers from the host. My guess is that they're programmed only to send the customers' bets up to the hosts and to receive updated software only.The more plausibile, yet far-fetched, conspiracy scenario is that the computerized drawings are programmed to examine the database
Oct 18, 2005, 4:31 pm - lchoro - Lottery Discussion Forum

"Taping" in advance & Conspiracy TheoriesReply
I know it doesn't have to be rigged to produce huge JPs, it was just a thought that randomly (no pun intended) occured in my always-thinking-pessimisticly head.As for computerized drawings, all you have to do is look at my alias (or my signature) to see where I stand.
Oct 18, 2005, 2:30 pm - NoCompLotto! - Lottery Discussion Forum

Could this happen again somewhereReply
Quads two days in a row in PA blackghost37Posted: October 26, 2004, 5:02 pm - IP LoggedWhat's going on with computerized drawings for PA. Yesterday midday was 4444 and today they had 5555 . Something very strange is going on.**************************************************************Well 4444 has returnedthis time in Conn. on 10/4/05 DayOne day after an exact New Moon,no longer wonder the resultKnew something big would happen a
Oct 5, 2005, 7:46 am - Blackapple - Pick 3 Forum

Oklahoma Lottery unveils scratch ticket designsReply
An interesting tidbit of information, for those interested:Oklahoma will be used Missouri's old drawing equipment, which they no longer needed after Missouri changed over to computerized drawings.The equipment, which normally costs more than $100,000, was bought for around $10,000.
Oct 4, 2005, 12:27 pm - Todd - Lottery News

Pennsylvania Lottery Chosen to Host 2008 International ConferenceReply
You must have a different scoring system. Bad games don't get negative points in my book, one. Two, I don't think Lucky For Life is a bad game. The top prize may be cheap, but who cares, I'm never gonna win it (or am I?).The only thing that gets negative points for me is computerized drawings and acts of bigotry.
Sep 30, 2005, 3:55 pm - JimmySand9 - Lottery News

will oklahoma have balls.......Reply
thanks tnplayer.hopefully people will wise up and start a backlash against computerized drawings in states attempting this evil deed but most of the everyday general lottery playing population doesn't really seem passionate about the issue.........
Sep 14, 2005, 6:16 am - LOTTOMIKE - Lottery Discussion Forum