Search

lotto synchronizer problems!!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Guru on November 10, 2003 I'm not ashamed for having bought lottobuster or the vibration math cd, or lottohat, or the honest lotto system in the past too. Although overtime, these systems proved to me that they were not capable of winning me any money. I do think that those who developed these systems, did put a lot of work in it, and that's what I payed for. I agree with Guru, when you buy a lottery program you aren't necessarily paying for something that works but
Nov 10, 2003, 12:35 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

the test of a real guru Reply
RJOh,Sorry, but I haven't been on these boards in several weeks (I've been busily preparing SimuLotto 2.0).I didn't shy away from the challenge of repeating my match of numbers for MegaMillions, but I thought that type of challenge was fun once, but, unlike some, I've never claimed that I can pick 3 of 6 numbers every week. I would be skeptical at anyone claiming to do that.What I offer is a long-term approach to the lottery. I believe winning the big jackpots of the lottery is purely a matter
Oct 15, 2003, 2:14 am - thomsol - Lottery Systems Forum

Making a 6/49 systemReply
Hi RJOh, Well that is true...proof is in the pudding so to speak! Can't argue with your there. What I really wanted to do was to show all you lotto pro's what approach that I am going with this app and whether you think it's new an innovative or not. As for predictions I haven't yet put my picking scheme into code. But the 6/49 that I'm working is Michigan's WinFall. Currently it's still pretty new, it started on 1/22/2003( but being a lotto pro you probably already know that :) ) anyways
Oct 13, 2003, 8:06 pm - Deke - Lottery Systems Forum

MM Drawing for Tuesday 9/30/03Reply
I used a 10 lines wheel for 14 numbers with a guaranteed match 3 if all 5 numbers were in the group. I used the last 10 draws to pick my numbers. Some lottery software suggest using at least 50 draws to pick your numbers. top 14 numbers:05 09 14 15 16 22 24 28 30 32 39 42 46 49 megaballs:10 13 14 19 28 29 30 42 45 47FILE:MM930 05 15 28 32 49 +10 14 28 32 46 49 +13 05 14 15 46 49 +29 16 22 30 39 42 +19 09 22 24 30 39 +28 09 16 24 39 42 +14 05 14 15 32 46 +
Sep 30, 2003, 6:45 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Lottery programsReply
To I M Trying,The point I was trying to make was, anyone claiming to have software that would improve your odds of winning could post a series of numbers over a period of time and compare their actual winnings with the normal odds of winning. For example the odds of winning in MegaMillions are:MATCH ODDS WIN 4/52 + 0/52 1/11272 $1503/52 + 1/52 1/12502 $1502/52 + 1/52 1/834 $103/52 + 0/52 1/245 $71/52 + 1/52 1/152 $30/
Sep 16, 2003, 10:26 am - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Wrong Numbers; not a system...just a factReply
For Ohio649P, I always play all 49 numbers so I know that I have all 7 CORRECT numbers, it just a matter of getting them in a paying combination. Tonights number were 04-06-17-23-33-46+49 and again the best I could do is get a free play. I was off one number for a match4 and $100. The last three draws I have gotten a free play but no money. I was doing even worst until I started picking numbers that had matched 3 seven times of better. Last year I matched 5 of 6 for $1500 so I got a monkey o
Sep 13, 2003, 5:37 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

New breakthrough prediction systemReply
To Hypersonig,VisualBasic isn't that old, I'm still using GWBasic. Bought QuickBasic and compiler and VisualBasic, never learned either good enough to write a program. QuickBasic compiler would compile my GWBasic program, so never had a good reason to learn. Now that there are no reference books for GWBasic, I may be forced to update.I use a RNG to make my picks because I like to pick from all the available numbers, but I limit my picks with parameters I get using lottery draw files history.
Sep 9, 2003, 6:53 pm - RJOh - Lottery Systems Forum

Mega Millions Drawing 9/5/03Reply
Quote: Originally posted by kbcherokee on September 08, 2003 RJOH: Visiondude and I are Ol' friends... We rib each other a lot about this QP thing. He and I think alot a like when it comes to winning any Jackpot... He'll know what I mean by that.I would be happy to test my pick's against his QP's to see who win's what OR who get's the closest to the number's that actually hit. But I know he doesn't reveil his number's so when either he or I win the BIG one, you will know, I assure you.Chie
Sep 9, 2003, 2:27 pm - visiondude - Jackpot Games Forum

Mega Millions Drawing 9/5/03Reply
RJOH:Yes, I think a system has an advantage over QP's regardless of how many lines or games you play. A system helps you reduce the amount of LUCK by increasing ones levergae using a system. The system with all the stats put together let's you see all the things that are happening with the random drawings so it is very easy to get close or on the number's that actually hit. Kinda hard to explain, but it works... One would have to see what is actually happening on the spreadsheet to
Sep 7, 2003, 5:51 pm - kbcherokee - Jackpot Games Forum

Mega Millions 8/29/03Reply
I seem to do better at PowerBall. I also did better at BigGame when I had to travel to Michigan to buy tickets. PB odds are a little better, but not that much better,so I picked 20 lines just like I did for PB wednesday drawing with similiar parameters. These are my picks:FILE:MM829A 1. 10 17 27 37 45 +24 2. 05 17 18 24 43 +32 3. 10 11 25 29 46 +37 4. 03 12 28 38 41 +15 5. 07 23 40 45 48 +04 6. 02 22 29 33 47 +48 7. 01 05 26 30 34 +46 8. 15 35
Aug 29, 2003, 5:21 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum