Search

Buckeye5 simulation for 03/11/03Reply
Teufellj,It really doen't take a lot of effort to come up with such information if you have an updated data files and you have written a routine to come up with similar information in the past. For example my Buckeye5 drawing file now has 2246 records dating back to 04/06/93. Again, with a 5/37 game that considers a match 2 as a prize, the odds of winning a prize are 1:7.9 per number and when one compare each drawing with the other drawings in the file one should expect an aveage of 281.95 wi
Mar 23, 2003, 8:03 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

Challenge to Fellow LotteryPost Friends!!Reply
Sorry to read you have retracted your challenge. As you pointed out, using different systems and wagering amounts would be like comparing apples and oranges, but camparing a winning system with the other systems would be like comparing a diamond with apples and oranges. If you do what others are doing and win, you just got lucky and your odds of losing is the same.Years ago when lotteries jackpots were larger than the odds of winning them, there was an investment company from Europe that invest
Mar 21, 2003, 3:16 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Challenge to Fellow LotteryPost Friends!!Reply
To Lottery AnalystI think you propose an interesting challenge. Last year, Lotto Cheatah who have tried to get people from this site to use his software participated in a similar challenge with a lottery news group and all they proved was that none of their systems were a winner. I agree with Lottowiz34 that systems are fine but they are only part of the strategy of the player. Many system simple give the player a lot of information about pass drawings and the player has to choose which number
Mar 17, 2003, 8:13 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

Systems and Strategies 101Reply
RJOh,I actually would not mind presenting some basics in - at least my - strategies for PICK 5, PICK 6 or other games. Usually I use tools - and guess others do too - to come up with these numbers.One of the problems is that lotteries other than PICK 3 and PICK 4 do not get very much attention in this and other forums. Besides of difference in chances and winnings, most of those games only occurs once or twice a week which minimizes the amount of posts related to them.My basic strategies (or ru
Mar 10, 2003, 4:09 pm - everett - Lottery Discussion Forum

Visiondude is right on the money !!Reply
secret,the secret is out of the bag (lol). like i said, everybody gets down different. if someone comes to me and says they can beat the odds and they like trying , by all means have at it. personally i think it is random although i have an open mind. like i said, to me it is more of a matter of destiny than attempting to pick the right numbers.i like what RJOH had to say. he wants to see results instead of theories. so do i. whoever gets to the big jackpot first will have the right to say
Feb 25, 2003, 12:54 am - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

masscash 5/35Reply
To retxx,You don't need software to do the job if you have some extra time. Just down load a data list of the most recent drawings. Look them over and compile a list of the parameters(sum,range,gaps and etc) on a piece of paper and sort them by occurance. Now you will want to pick 7 combinnations of five randomly that have not matched 3 in the last 50 draws or so and you might want them to be within the parameters of the numbers on your data list. You may want to play several list of five to
Feb 14, 2003, 1:57 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Megamillions picks 12/24/02Reply
The program I use has a RNG(random number generator) with no particular algorythm. It stores up to 2000 seven digit lottery file(Ohio649P has seven digits) and can store up to 300 picks. When I start the program, it load up chosen lottery file, analize it, displays data like sums, gaps, and numbers of time numbers in file have matched 1,2,3 and etc. I can look at that data, use it for my parameters or choose different parameters. The program pick a number randomly, sort it and compare it w
Dec 26, 2002, 5:48 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

where are you cheetah ??Reply
To LottocheatahThe odds in a 6/49 game are:6/6 = 1 : 13,983,8165/6 = 1 : 54,2014/6 = 1 : 10323/6 = 1 : 57So if you play 3,500 times you should expect to match 3 (3500/57) 64 times and match 4 (3500/1032) 3.4 times using random numbers, that not rocket science.When I figured the payout I used the Canadian lottery website where one play cost $1(Canadian) not a European site which charges $126 (U.S.) for one play for 10 weeks. I assume the extra $100 include fees and adjustments for the exchange
Dec 13, 2002, 5:10 pm - RJOh - Pick 5 Forum

where are you cheetah ??Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on December 10, 2002 To Lottocheatah,I thought you were being up front with your responses to Visiondude until I went to the newsgroup rec.gambling.lottery at gooble.com and read the posts of Paul McCoy and your response to him. In those posts your score and the score of the winner(Nik Barker) were mentioned along with numbers matched and neither one of you matched enought to cover the cost of playing 3500 combinations.Nik Barker (winner) score = 6126365 x 3/6 @
Dec 13, 2002, 11:33 am - lottocheatah - Pick 5 Forum

where are you cheetah ??Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on December 10, 2002 You had the answers to Visiondude questions all this time and used fussy math to avoid a real world answer. I have to agree with Paul McCoy - your software may pick a winner but so will a simple RNG or QP if you pick enough combinations and you are lucky. RJOhPaul McCoy? Oh yes, him. He wasn't in the competition. He's one of those naysayers who refuses to believe that the odds can be beaten. He's an import from another newsgroup. You can r
Dec 13, 2002, 11:07 am - lottocheatah - Pick 5 Forum