Search

Florida: 2/1 - 2/28/2013Reply
Oh I agree! At least have a Main Pool of Clean numbers to pick from cause we know some numbers just come out more than others!
Feb 21, 2013, 3:45 pm - Knightsquad - Pick 3 Forum

29 co-workers share $1 million Powerball prizeReply
Congrats to these folks, and God bless them for including the ones that did't get their pool payment in on time. leaving the greedy lawyers out of it.
Feb 12, 2013, 4:35 pm - haymaker - Lottery News

RL's Digit Master Pro Big Game software download.Reply
RL, I have DMP version 4 it is exciting to play with. I'm still learning the menus. Can you explain how to use Pair-G, F-tool the lexi program? I enjoy playing testing the game. Also, my son is interested in downloading it. Do you still offer the download to those outside the pool? Thanks for your time.
Feb 12, 2013, 1:12 pm - suepmuse - Lottery Systems Forum

Ornery dog leads to $1M lottery winReply
How about all of us here at LP (139,043), kick in for one line for tonight's MM drawing. That would only set each of us back .000007192 cents each. If we hit tonight's jackpot for $13 million, we would all be $93 richer! We might also set the Guinness Book of world Records for the largest lottery pool ever.
Feb 12, 2013, 12:28 pm - mcginnin56 - Lottery News

Sequential difference for P3,P4, P5, Lotto: 5/31-5/34Reply
Let's work more on P4, using data above, using your highest digit of selected triads as your x limit(Less picks if waging on distinct picks). Start with date jan 28, draw set 3383 gives seq.difference 0-5-5 corresponding to triads 029-021-291 and 574-576-745. I will bet more on difference 5 and pick triads 574-576-745 with x=0 to 7 (highest), the digis 5746 could be deleted for distinct bet, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 for final picks triads/ 0,1,3,4. Lets take another date, say jan 28(eve draw), draw set 3
Feb 7, 2013, 11:18 am - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Look up for Pool size trend, choose a stringReply
For folks using the reduced string for your BASE pair(P3), triad (P4) , Quads(P5), your x is 0 thru highest digit of reduced string. Lets say your final string was 178, your x is 0 to 8(highest), if 245 ,x is 0 thru 5. Now if you decide to play distinct bets, then minus the reduced string, eg 178 from 0 -8 leaving you 0,2,3,4,5,6. Same for reduced string 245 from 0-5, leaving you 0,1, 3. Test it and see how it works, is about reducing the pool size all the way, maintaning the positions of digits
Feb 4, 2013, 12:51 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
If you're actually serious about pursuing research into how to narrow down the Powerball or Mega Millions matrix into a pool of 28 numbers that have a decent chance of containing the 5 winning numbers, why don't you break off and start your own thread rather than continuing to associate yourself with this mess? If I did that, I would be just expanding on Ronnie's idea and some of the ideas RJ and others have posted. It's easier for me to add my ideas to theirs. I've been around gambling, sp
Jan 30, 2013, 6:01 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

NY Lotto adds only $300k now?!Reply
Take 5 doesn't roll period. If no one wins the jackpot, the money gets added to the second-place prize pool. Lotto had been rolling at $300K for a while now. I noticed it back in November when they started doing it. I hadn't realized the last two rollovers were bigger; I wonder if the buy $5/get $2 free promotion this month has increased sales enough that they can afford to add more than $300K to the pot. Also, for most of January the jackpot has been more than the Mega Millions minimum (even
Jan 24, 2013, 9:48 pm - mediabrat - Jackpot Games Forum

signing the petition for true drawingsReply
How does one check if computerized drawings are random, or selective, like Russian Roulette? They will not have professor from Harvard inspecting, will they? That's a bad part. Everyone should sign the petition. The alternative is to try and crack computer pattern. In general such change means that the type of people who wins will be different from now on. Whomever did not win big before... oh, that's us. :) In general big prize winners pool will dwindle thanks to computers.
Jan 24, 2013, 9:45 am - Uluska - Lottery Discussion Forum

Michigan MirrorsReply
279, we now have the 9th winner. To recap on the mirror numbers from December, in 30 draws, we have had 9 of the numbers fall, almost 33 percent, going to run the January numbers through the inspect 3, see whats missing in pairs and sums, match that up to the december mirrors, weed our number pool down.
Jan 15, 2013, 7:58 pm - sully16 - Lottery Systems Forum