Search

649 formulaReply
RJOh wrote: ``For anyone who's interested, 958 completed cycles of 49 numbers appearing could be counted in the 997 drawings of Ohio Classic Lotto that varies from 19 to 65 drawings.`` And that is consistent with my analysis of the 31-year(!) data for the Canada 6/49 lotto: 19 to 64 drawings for all 49 numbers to appear in the first 6 numbers (not considering the bonus number), with a mean of 36 +/-2 rounded (with 95% confidence). FYI, Gwoof, when the bonus number is included (i.e. a draw
Jun 5, 2013, 7:06 pm - mathhead - Mathematics Forum

Universal filters programs for cash 5 kinds of games?Reply
RJOh What they call random is the very same for all the cash 5 games or it should be, I know that for the pick 3 games that so called random is the same for all the pick 3 games here on the U.S.A. So if you can win the games on one state you should be able to do the same for all the other states, I think that thru the years I might have been able to prove that, at least to myself. If the games and draws are conducted in a honest way, then the history of the past winning numbers don't li
May 26, 2013, 7:17 pm - MonEl - Lottery Systems Forum

I predict a new Currently on Line Record tonightReply
RJOh, The bottom of the home page showed this at 11:39 PM CST: Lottery Post Statistics Currently Online: 17162 Record: 31,653 on November 28, 2012, 10:13 pm The $656M Mega Millions jackpot was March of 2012. What went on Nov 28 of 2012?
May 19, 2013, 12:48 am - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

Should a winning system be posted on the LP?Reply
Hi, All private interactions I have with anyone stay that way..private. I know everyone would like a show and tell, I'm just not that way, sorry. RL, I would like to know how you are fairing with your system. It's one of the best I've ever seen posted on the LP. *S* RJOH, I think there may be something to fear if a winning system got out. The fever that comes from some of the bigger jackpots The increased revenue and the bonus to marketing is huge. I hear, that like in Powerbal
May 4, 2013, 5:51 am - JKING - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpotReply
Stack47, your knowledge of the games is very impressive. Unfortunately, the answers to the questions you ask, along with $5, will get you no more than a snack at Starbucks. RJOh, I guess I assumed too much when I assumed that at least one proverbial half a brain was functioning and knew that rates of return was implicit in my questions. Ronnie316, no comment. It appears none of you wants to comment on the fact that your selection methods had nothing to do with how syndicates won money
Apr 8, 2013, 12:24 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpotReply
RJOh, Are you trying to tell us that states are discontinuing games due to STATE LOSSES brought about by system players beating the odds? If you are, I'd like to see some proof. I think you will find their reasons are not at all what you are implying. A good case in point is the one you brought up, the Massachusetts Cash Winfal game. Syndicates of gamblers took advantage of a poorly designed game and won by buying massive numbers of tickets when the lower tier prizes were inflated through the
Apr 7, 2013, 10:24 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpotReply
BobP wrote: To actually be useful, the information needs to include how many of the game's numbers were also among the set of past draws that had the next draw's winning numbers . Oh, I see your point now. And I agree wholeheartedly with your conclusions. That is why I have been emphasizing how many unique numbers are actually in the set of previous drawings that are typically required to cover all 5 drawn numbers. I was trying to be more subtle. You can lead a horse to water, but you cann
Apr 4, 2013, 7:45 pm - mathhead - Lottery Systems Forum

Playing recently drawn numbers to win a jackpotReply
I wrote previously: For example, for 3/29/2013, the regular numbers 25,31,36,46,53 appeared in 18,44,1,38,25 drawings earlier respectively, encompassing 46,55,5,54,44 unique numbers respectively. RJOh wrote: Our files must differ, mine shows 1,6,18,38 and 44 for the same combination. No, just a horrible typo on my part. I had grabbed all the numbers in one line from my spreadsheet; then I mangled them when I edited it for the posting. Sorry. I got exactly what you got for the 3/29/201
Apr 2, 2013, 10:26 pm - mathhead - Lottery Systems Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Hello RJOH I like that word....... parameters If you simple identified the parameters of the next winning combination and it was within those parameters a good percent of the time then that alone could be enough. To me anyway...... that means setting up a Trap that greatly improves my chances using the math .... logic......and game history. Using these things.....within certain parameters .......I regularly improve my chances by over 90% ++. Ninety Percent is a good
Apr 2, 2013, 12:09 pm - WIN D - Mathematics Forum

When was the last time MM was higher than PB?Reply
RJOh, I think the 'default', the most commonly referred to amount is what's printed on the tickets, what's posted here at LP on Worldwide Jackpots, what's on the monitors where they sell tickets. I'm just saying......... billionaire2be, Yeah, I remember the MM last year, I think it finally landed on $656M and was split two or three ways. One of the winners was not too far from where I live, in a toen called Red Bud, IL. Someone had started a rumor that someone else in that town had w
Apr 2, 2013, 10:29 am - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum