Search

lottery jackpotsReply
Quote: Originally posted by weshar75 on December 31, 2003 I had read an article in the newspaper that said 70% of the tickets sold were quick pick and 30% were people's own chosen numbers. Now if you take that into account along with the fact that they will repeat numbers and the odds of you actually winning the jackpot. You can see why it can take awhile for the jackpot to be hit and the large jackpot amounts. I don't believe that those figures are correct! Majority could be 51% to 60+?no dou
Jan 2, 2004, 6:17 am - MrSteel01 - Lottery Discussion Forum

How much would you pay?Reply
hypersoniq,I would never suggest using a lottery pool to play pick 3 or pick 4 games. As mentioned in my previous post, lottery pools work best with large jackpots where a fraction of the jackpot is still LOTS of money. This is why I posted the ACME question in the Jakcpot Games forum, rather than the Pick 3 or 4 forums.In response to your second comment, combos never disappear, magically or otherwise. But it is a mathematical fact that 2 tickets have twice the chances of winning over a single t
Dec 29, 2003, 10:50 am - Jake649 - Jackpot Games Forum

PA Super Six is going away...Reply
I'm exciting to see what the odds and payouts will be for Match 6 Lotto. If they are good I may play the game every week. I've gotten away from playing Powerball every week this year and now seem to find myself only buying it when it goes over $100 Million. I think that is partly because I have not won much this year on the lottery (-$160).The best PA game by far is Cash 5. Any time it's $200,000 or more I play. I wish they would start the jackpots at $200,000. If they did, I'd play every day.
Dec 24, 2003, 3:55 pm - smd173 - Jackpot Games Forum

Powerball at $100 million!!Reply
Quote: Originally posted by weshar75 on December 14, 2003I am wondering if powerball and mega millions have ever thought about a merge of the two games to create one mass lottery for the U.S. What would be the point. Right now both games are played by many of the same people when they are in adjacent states. When their jackpots reach $100M or more, the number of players peaks. If a combined lottery didn't start off at $100M, the overall number of players would decline from the number of play
Dec 14, 2003, 10:51 am - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

powerball at 76 milReply
Ok I'm back had to get some shut eye. Lottoking we will work on next Fridays mega millions you let me know how many history numbers you need and I will get them. Don't let the combatants trouble you. Stay focused on the work you do. If you are using software to get your numbers run them through filters.Mega millions changed the amount of balls a while back they added more gold balls. they did this to get increased income and generate higher jackpots. color=#800080Big Game Mega Millions Lottery
Dec 10, 2003, 9:12 am - four4me - Jackpot Games Forum

An Idea for Mega MillionsReply
I like big jackpots and if MM does get to $300-400 million, it would be exciting. I'd be planning to buy an island in the South Pacific next to Marlon Brando's. But I like to see winners, and if someone is winning $10 million a week, that's okay with me. I don't want to see odds changed to make it harder to win, it's already way too hard as it is. No matter what you win, even if you win the lowest amount possible, it's a huge life-changing amount of money. I had a Mass Megabucks season ticket
Dec 5, 2003, 8:32 am - tg636 - Jackpot Games Forum

Steve Player systems - Anyone use them?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by Pick-4_Master on December 04, 2003 The instructions that accompany his systems tell you how to use it in order to win what he does personally to win so much is a different story. I think the answer to that is fairly simple. Steve was lucky in the beginning and won a big sum of money. The more money you have, the more combinations you can play. The more combinations you play (with a system that makes at least a bit of sense offcourse) the better your odds of winning bi
Dec 4, 2003, 4:59 pm - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

An Idea for Mega MillionsReply
I've said this before, but here goes: Why in God's name does anyone think MM needs to produce larger jackpots? How much is enough? Why would anyone be on the side of the state collecting millions of dollars week after week with no winner? Do you buy a ticket with a dream of winning? Is it just that you find a $400 million jackpot more interesting and fun than a boring $44 million jackpot?I could take the boredom. Tonight's jackpot lump sum would give $17,500,000 after taxes in Massachusetts. I
Dec 4, 2003, 12:59 pm - tg636 - Jackpot Games Forum

Man Buys 100 Tickets After Dreaming NumbeReply
EXCALIBUR Thank you very much for your input! People don't realize the power their own minds have in creating and bringing about dvents, even lottery wins. One of my favorite works on visualization is Creating Money by Sanaya Roman. It's a classic, explained very simply with principles which do work if applied correctly. This book does not get into lottery systems or techniques, but does deal with establishing a correct mindset along with ability to visualize and achieve a desired go
Dec 3, 2003, 11:35 am - konane - Lottery Discussion Forum

Welcome Ya'll...Reply
RJOh you are right. But from all those 14 time when the white balls have been below 32, most of the time, someone has won. Do you have any statistics for all the drawings when the white balls have been very close to each other or chronological?According to theory , mega millions should have pot sizes way above powerball, but as we know, it doesnt. So there is certainly something different. Unless everyone playing mega million is the luckiest SOB alive, theoretically mega millions should ha
Dec 1, 2003, 6:31 pm - twisted - Jackpot Games Forum