Search

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Naw, It takes quite a bit for me to be impressed. That was actually a very happy that he, (and everyone else that wins) won. I know what the human brain is capable of, so it's got nothing to do with impressed. I'm just actually happy for him that he got another win. The statistics are a little different than the odds are. They are marked as to what the Lotteries say they are, and that was what I was talking about. According to their odds, he did better than they say they are. Their odds ar
Mar 19, 2013, 10:15 pm - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
RJOh, Where are you coming up with this nonsense? What nonsense? Are you now going to pretend that this has never been discussed in these Forums before, and that I have not started threads devoted exclusively to backtesting and Monte Carlo Simulation techniques? Click here to refresh your memory. You can't back test the future regardless of what you believe. Who has suggested backtesting the future? It appears you don't know the difference between a backtester and a simulato
Mar 17, 2013, 1:17 am - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
I may be wrong but none of the combinations RJOH posted had 3 or more hits. Thus, $36 paid, no return. I didn't conveniently' come up with anything on purpose. I just posted the last set of 28 numbers available. My point was and is that any set of 28 numbers can be profitable, or not. It all depends on which balls manage to make it through the escape hatch during an official drawing. The next set of 28 could include a 5+1 combination. But that won't be known until after players sp
Feb 23, 2013, 3:31 pm - bobby623 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lotto Strategy - Odds of winning vs Chances of winningReply
Correct RJOh, Another example is the Win 4 Life game. Odds of matching 4 of 6 = 1 : 555.11 This is a 6/42 game with a Free Ball. I do not take into the account the Free Ball, just the basic 6 numbers. Number of drawings from 03/01/06 thru 01/16/13 is 720 drawings. Number of drawings matching 4 of 6 of the same numbers, hitting more than once is 545 or 75.69% of the 720 total drawings. I was able to put these 545 drawings into 171 Groups of related combinations. My contention is th
Jan 20, 2013, 12:09 pm - butch2030 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
RJOh Which glorified RNG are you talking about, I don't remember putting a RNG up for download. Everything needed to use the software is in the post. I remember another member that posted a so called system and after a time figured he had covered everything. I don't remember anyone hitting a JP using it. DMP was downloaded around 4000 times overall and I get emails all the time asking how to do something. Even after I was accused of adding spyware which was totally false, it was d
Jan 15, 2013, 8:51 pm - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Lottery Discussion Forum

Mega-millions settings and suggestions for Digit Master.Reply
Hi Guys I wanted to point out a topic that is worth reading, Do some number combinations have better odds? by ronnie316. The multi stage filter I included in the last update is an old program but I will be rewritting it and try to make it a little better as it does much the same thing as is being dicussed there. One can also use the string wheel in DM to gain advantage of this. The above topic is located in the Lottery Discusion forum and I think pool members should check out the
Sep 20, 2012, 10:25 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Jackpot Games Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
The results are in. We are looking for number combinations with better odds Ronnie316 4+0 RJOH 2+0 The winning combination was on line 69,123 11 - 21 - 27 - 29 - 43 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 29 - 45 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 29 - 47 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 29 - 49 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 29 - 51 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 29 - 53 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 29 - 55 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 31 - 33 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 31 - 35 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 31 - 37 ** 8 11 - 21 - 27 - 31 - 39 ** 8 11 -
Jun 20, 2012, 11:53 am - Ronnie316 - Lottery Discussion Forum

New York PredictionsReply
My means likes this as below: Hot Predictors (Last 30 Days by Hit Ratio) Member Hit Ratio Picks Hits 1. SexWithNatalie 13.27% 610 81 2. ohiopick3 12.93% 116 15 3. jimjwright 12.02% 2,461 296 4. pointspread 10.00% 10 1 5. READY-YETI 9.98% 1,632 163 6. lamarrstar 9.77% 4,910 480 7. butch2030 6.45% 5,032 325 8. ressuccess 5.00% 20 1 9. RJOh 4.47% 67 3 10. crossedfingers 4.38% 1,050 46
May 19, 2012, 10:34 pm - lottoburg - Pick 4 Forum

Odds on MisinformationReply
You've just explained why your point it moot. You suggest breaking the entire matrix into two subsets. Set one being consecutive sequence combinations/permutations. Set two being non-consecutive sequence combinations/permutations. At this point you defeat the purpose of deriving the subsets by stating the odds of the overall matrix. Like RJOh and CT have both stated, once you divide the matrix into a large pool (non-consecutive), and a small pool (consecutive sequence) the odds ch
Mar 13, 2012, 7:20 pm - garyo1954 - Lottery Systems Forum

Maddog's 2012 MM & PB Challenge StatsReply
Ranking MM Ranking PB Ranking Ttl name Hits name Hits name Hits litebets27 6 lottoguybc 5 litebets27 10 esr54 4 esr54 5 esr54 9 savagegoose 3 litebets27 4 lottoguybc 7 four4me 3 old eagle 4 fja 6 fja 3 Maddog10 4 old eagle 5 B
Mar 4, 2012, 8:59 am - fja - Jackpot Games Forum