- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 10:40 pm
You last visited
June 5, 2026, 12:00 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
I have developed a method to play Jackpot Games.Prev TopicNext Topic
-
-
Simplest way to understand it is to think of it as daily pick-3 type game except it has 6 digits instead of 3.
The data is analyzed one digit/position at a time. The label A = 1st digit in the set, B = 2nd, C = 3rd etc..
Because there are 10 possible digits, 0 through 9, I use 10 games for each group. The color graph layout
shows how many times each digit hit in each group. blue = no-show,,Green = showed once, yellow = digits
showed twice and Red=showed 3 or more. The textbox to the right shows the actual digits as drawn for
each position. Basically it's the same thing as described in your book adjusted for digits instead of numbers.
I use 10 games so that each digit 0 to 9 all have a chance to show just as you use 8 draws for a 5-39.
If I analyzed the digits as is shown in the book, I would only be using 1 and 2/3 games in each group as
when working with digits there are 6 possible digits in each set. The number of possible digits in position
A is dependent on the game matrix. A 5-39 matrix has 575,757 total lines so here, position A is limited to
digits 0 through 5. All the same rules can be applied to the lex-index as to the numbers games. Several states
now offer pick-5 pick-6 daily games and this method makes it universal across both types of drawings.
The graph is not really necessary as the data for each group is formatted and written to a file which can then
be analyzed by the program and then fed into a positional wheel to generate the lines. I guess one could
say it's completely automated from start to finish.
What I am testing now is applying the same rules to a type of auto filtering process where I am using standard
filters but use the same sort of 2/3 logic so that the filter ranges are self ranged. It's my opinion that the rules
you mention in the book can be applied to almost anything that's directly related to the drawing. I have over
150 filters I can test and plan to select those that are the most consistent, ie easiest to predict. I have a program
that can generate the filters hit rates within the entire matrix so I know what to expect before the very first
draw.
Thanks again for posting.
RL
PS I added the picture again for reference
....
-
"Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people." Eleanor Rousevelt
-
Simplest way to understand it is to think of it as daily pick-3 type game except it has 6 digits instead of 3.
The data is analyzed one digit/position at a time. The label A = 1st digit in the set, B = 2nd, C = 3rd etc..
Because there are 10 possible digits, 0 through 9, I use 10 games for each group. The color graph layout
shows how many times each digit hit in each group. blue = no-show,,Green = showed once, yellow = digits
showed twice and Red=showed 3 or more. The textbox to the right shows the actual digits as drawn for
each position. Basically it's the same thing as described in your book adjusted for digits instead of numbers.
I use 10 games so that each digit 0 to 9 all have a chance to show just as you use 8 draws for a 5-39.
If I analyzed the digits as is shown in the book, I would only be using 1 and 2/3 games in each group as
when working with digits there are 6 possible digits in each set. The number of possible digits in position
A is dependent on the game matrix. A 5-39 matrix has 575,757 total lines so here, position A is limited to
digits 0 through 5. All the same rules can be applied to the lex-index as to the numbers games. Several states
now offer pick-5 pick-6 daily games and this method makes it universal across both types of drawings.
The graph is not really necessary as the data for each group is formatted and written to a file which can then
be analyzed by the program and then fed into a positional wheel to generate the lines. I guess one could
say it's completely automated from start to finish.
What I am testing now is applying the same rules to a type of auto filtering process where I am using standard
filters but use the same sort of 2/3 logic so that the filter ranges are self ranged. It's my opinion that the rules
you mention in the book can be applied to almost anything that's directly related to the drawing. I have over
150 filters I can test and plan to select those that are the most consistent, ie easiest to predict. I have a program
that can generate the filters hit rates within the entire matrix so I know what to expect before the very first
draw.
Thanks again for posting.
RL
PS I added the picture again for reference
"Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people." Eleanor Rousevelt
-
-
Hi all
I am in the process of testing and so far everything is looking good. In the pic below I checked 1000
games to test the distribution of Lex-Index digits for position 3 for my 5-39. These are the count
for the number of digit hits in 10 draws. They are calculated by starting with draw #1 through draw
10, next draw #2 to draw #11 etc.. The expected in a 10 game group is 6.6 and you can see that
6 & 7 digit hits account for 70.3% of the games, I'll settle for that any day.
....
-
Hi all
I am in the process of testing and so far everything is looking good. In the pic below I checked 1000
games to test the distribution of Lex-Index digits for position 3 for my 5-39. These are the count
for the number of digit hits in 10 draws. They are calculated by starting with draw #1 through draw
10, next draw #2 to draw #11 etc.. The expected in a 10 game group is 6.6 and you can see that
6 & 7 digit hits account for 70.3% of the games, I'll settle for that any day.
"Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people." Eleanor Rousevelt
-
-
Am a big fan of RL-Randomlogic after he put a stamp on your book , i went straight ahead and bought your book with no doubt in mind and i just finished reading it. Though i have found the book easy to understand am going to peruse it one more time just in case i have missed some gold nuggets. I wish if i could get someone to help me with automated excel it would make life easier , i am playing 7/49 lotto at the bookies at the moment am looking forward to nail those twins and triplets.
Thanx for sharing your Knowledge LA igrok...
-
I am going to borrow your words, carrot. It is WONDERFUL to see RL back over here and most of all - he has produced another gem. And thumbs up for RL and Igrok for such an interesting method.
RL, you mention position 1 in your lottery being between 0-5. What I do for my pick-6 is looking at the column B1 to B2 from my 6/45+2BB. Then I look the the highest average on both columns and B1 is almost certain to happen for the next draw.
Cheers,
Gambler667
-
Hi all
I am in the process of testing and so far everything is looking good. In the pic below I checked 1000
games to test the distribution of Lex-Index digits for position 3 for my 5-39. These are the count
for the number of digit hits in 10 draws. They are calculated by starting with draw #1 through draw
10, next draw #2 to draw #11 etc.. The expected in a 10 game group is 6.6 and you can see that
6 & 7 digit hits account for 70.3% of the games, I'll settle for that any day.
-
Last night I had 4 main numbers in my 12 lines for a pick 6....Missed by 1 twin consecutive pair only last night - OUCH !!!!!
Gambler667
-
Last night I had 4 main numbers in my 12 lines for a pick 6....Missed by 1 twin consecutive pair only last night - OUCH !!!!!
Gambler667
-
I played the lines!! Same happened last week, missed 50K in Australian Powerball by 2 main numbers only.
-
"Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people." Eleanor Rousevelt
