Search

Florida Scratch Offs - Post Pictures if posibleReply
So this isn't a great win or anything, but I wanted to post it for two reasons. First, it's one of those annoying tickets that has dollar amounts on it that otherwise wouldn't be on a ticket if only one number matched. Secondly, the odds of winning $40 on this ticket. 1 in 400. I had better odds of winning $100 or anything else under $100 than this. Lol. On a side note I did something I never do. I saw a couple scratched WoF tickets on the TOP (important) of the trash at Publix so I grabbed t
Apr 10, 2016, 6:50 pm - oldghost - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum

Florida Scratch Offs - Post Pictures if posibleReply
Found like 4 of those Wheel of fortune tickets on the ground outside of the food store by where I live. The tickets didn't even have the bonus vowel section scratched. The 2nd chance drawing is probably going to be next to impossible to win with a significantly lower number of prizes to be won compared to the Flamingo multiplier promotion, so that incentive shouldn't really be considered when buying that ticket. There was 96 of the Flamingo second chance prizes, and a woman claimed she didn't wi
Apr 8, 2016, 9:13 pm - Dracos - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum

Goseahawks -111/+222..and observation high pair chartReply
Many ways to reduce a group of numbers down to playable quantity. Sums, key digits, digits out, vtracs, pairs, etc. Of course these are based on past results. Which you have stated many times you believe have no effect on the next draw. So, the best odds for YOU are to keep track of the odds and play accordingly. BTW, have you ever posted any predictions other than State of the Day challenge? Do you have a set method or system that works for you?
Apr 8, 2016, 3:06 pm - Jayhawk58 - Lottery Systems Forum

21 Club systemReply
Well just to be clear about the odds I was talking about, those numbers were in regards to seeing any pair repeat over 4 draws. If you were tracking a particular pair, the odds would be much lower. Also, I was including both mid and eve draws not just one or the other in talking about the time frames for expectations. If you are just looking at eve draws, you would have to go back much further than January. It would happen on average every 463 draws. Going back to January would only be 80 som
Mar 23, 2016, 11:11 pm - Wisconsin3054 - Lottery Systems Forum

21 Club systemReply
Thanks BA !! High compliment !! Don't pay any attention to the naysayer. the 3 and 5 will fall tomorrow. I didn't think they were today, the 5 possibly. I don't pay attention to odds all that much. More probability. I have watched digits and learned. Just when you think odds will do one thing, it does something else. Probability may not be spot on, but does happen.
Mar 23, 2016, 9:45 pm - Jayhawk58 - Lottery Systems Forum

Mirror ,distance from 10 tttReply
Ok, the system is designed to use few picks but gives 56 options for those picks? That's not really a problem for the evaluation. I am looking at whether the result landed within the options your system gave. Yesterday, it did. With just the standard game odds, there was a 25% chance that would happen. If over time, your system regularly gives that 25% chance or so under standard game odds, but the result lands within that group more often than that, it would certainly look like you are on to
Mar 16, 2016, 2:06 pm - Wisconsin3054 - Lottery Systems Forum

Time for Mega Millions to changeReply
I think they should make the PB MM easier to win smaller jackpots, not like they just changed to make the games harder to win to make humongous jackpots. Players want to win, even if it's a smaller amount....we still can say we won something! In NY State, we have NY Lotto where the odds of getting 6 of 6 is 1: 45,057,474. but we get 2 games for $1 which makes the odds 1: 22,528,737. Tonight's jackpot is $15.7 mil. Not too shabby!
Mar 12, 2016, 11:17 am - TheMeatman2005 - Jackpot Games Forum

Time for Mega Millions to changeReply
MM is fine the way it is If it goes to $2 or makes it even more difficult to win (Already abysmal odds that are only better then PB) then I dont see myself playing it anymore PB at $2 and absurd odds is already a joke that is only worth playing when pot gets big. If MM follows in its footsteps then like PB it would be a game I rarely play Lotto's should not be looking to price out buyers and make jackpots almost impossible to win
Mar 9, 2016, 10:31 pm - Illinoisdreamer - Jackpot Games Forum

Are all top prizes in circulation immediately?
Two of the Scratchers games I am playing both have 33% of their total prizes claimed, but now both of them have 50% of their top prizes claimed (2 claimed out of 4 total for each game). On the other hand, few of the mid-level prizes have been claimed (1% for one game, 18% for the other). Since I play with the hope of getting the top prize, should I stop playing until 50% of the prizes are claimed (under the assumption that the remaining top prizes won't be put into circulation until 50% of th
Mar 5, 2016, 9:38 am - James78 - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum

Three time a Year numbersReply
Focus on and research on any particular group is a good thing. Making it easier for players to do that in a simple way is a talent. If we can boil down a lot of odds and math into a more manageable tool the better. There is a lot of math and odds behind this one that make it one of those. Helpful perspectives that simplify and condense all the details are a good thing. At some point, the underlying details of why they work need to be included if possible right?
Mar 4, 2016, 11:41 am - Edibs3 - Lottery Systems Forum