Search

RL's Digit Master Pro Big Game software download.Reply
If I understand correctly I see the following: There are 720 singles which can be reduced to 120 (6-way). The traditional way they are reduced to 120 is representing them in ascending order. Ascending order is what Winsum refers to as N1. N2 represents 120 numbers, N3 represents 120 numbers, N4 represents 120 numbers, N5 represents 120 numbers and N6 represents 120 numbers. So I assume a strategy could be to either Play or Block these 6 patterns based on history for straight play. I think
Jun 10, 2013, 8:11 am - jimjwright - Lottery Systems Forum

10 quikpicks vs 10 single quikpicksReply
I don't know how it works in Korea but I have bought multiple lines in the same ticket and multiple tickets separately. I compared the two. The numbers are equally random and the odds of having some of the numbers repeated are about the same. So, from now on, I just buy multiple lines in the same ticket to save time and paper.
Jun 9, 2013, 1:37 am - redhot7 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Code has already been brokenReply
Well, that's not true. After two plays I would just increment it up to .50cent/boxed number to keep ahead of loses. You seem to be under the impression that losses would be significantly greater than wins. But, this isn't really a problem due to the ideology and methodology of my system. I've stacked the odds in my favor and losses are kept to a minimum.
Jun 9, 2013, 1:06 am - Pick3Ma$ter - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Code has already been brokenReply
Aw, you're getting online payoff odds, but you're still only getting even money on a 150 to 1 payoff. Again, I'm not knocking you system, but why are you only betting a Quarter?
Jun 8, 2013, 5:58 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Up to Date 25 May 2013; UK Lotto All time best performing pairs table...Reply
Thanks Despite joining this site a couple of years ago I'm only just getting my head round systems and reading through posts, your info is very useful, where did you get odds of 60:1 for a pair? There doesnt seem to be much about the UK lottery on here, if you know any different would you be so kind as to point me in the right direction. Well done on your win, thanks again and good luck.
Jun 8, 2013, 10:52 am - macmacmac - Lottery Discussion Forum

Why so few lottery pool winners these days - is there not strength in numbers?Reply
I hate pools, seem like hassle. Would rather just buy my own tickets, plus I don't play every week only when the JP is huge so playing for smaller JP's isn't what I want to do. Ofc I would be very happy with winning small but I don't like the odds of playing for that haha
Jun 7, 2013, 9:35 pm - JoshUK - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Code has already been brokenReply
Bragging rights can only be claimed after you've proven your method to work. So many people come here telling everyone they cracked it, and then disappear almost as fast as they came. I wonder when you decided to use the word Stir instead of Steer , whether it was a genuine mistake, or a freudian slip. Then you claim you're not selling anything, but you clearly mention a book that you're working on. If my math works correctly, the odds of knowing what's in the book is pretty close to odds
Jun 7, 2013, 6:39 pm - onlymoney - Lottery Discussion Forum

Talk about one unbelievable drawing last night..Reply
The WA match 4 game is not a 4-digit game, it's 4/24, so 1-in-10,626 odds. Still 1,2,3,4 out of 24 balls is an interesting hit.
Jun 6, 2013, 1:08 pm - Jon D - Lottery Discussion Forum

Winner of record $590.5 million Powerball lottery jackpot announcedReply
Someone in this site suggested first that the lottery winner was a group of people and that it was impossible for one person to win it. Then he/she claimed that the Jackpot wouldn't increase to over 500 mil. Talk about irony. To those who play the lottery don't let those with their statistic intimidate you from playing or ruin your dream. Anything is possible even when the odds are against you.
Jun 6, 2013, 11:56 am - Morningstar! - Lottery News

1-2-3-4 Drawing in Washington Match 4Reply
How do you know that? Just because the numbers are sequential, doesn't mean the machine is rigged. Each combination has equal odds. The odds of having the numbers 1 2 3 4 are just as likely as 8 13 19 24. This is not the fist time that numbers from a lottery came up sequentially. Just earlier this year on January 13, my own state has sequential numbers 16 17 18 19 20. There are 29 winners. Fortunately for the lottery, the prizes are shared and each winner only got less than 2,000 dollars.
Jun 6, 2013, 2:51 am - redhot7 - Lottery Discussion Forum