Search

Which is easier pick 3 or 4
Give me your opinion on which one is easier regardless of the odds. At the end i will tell you which one is easier, less time consuming and why.
Nov 5, 2010, 9:04 pm - basil19 - Lottery Discussion Forum

What is the Richard Lustig secret?Reply
Never bought the book.The secret is just he spends a lot of money on the games not just a few buck.We are talking hundreds of dollars on each of the games.That way he increases his odds of hitting jackpots.You better have some deep pockets for this so called system.
Nov 5, 2010, 1:29 am - CajunWin4 - Lottery Systems Forum

HELP! Macro to eliminate 5 match numbersReply
RJOH I once read in the Bible that God caused a ass to speak. I though it was fable but now think it could be Quite true. My wife has a system of hitting 2 or 3 numbers on one line with about 75% hit rate. The odds for any one drawing are for selecting a set at random, does this mean that if the set is not selected at random the odds do not apply? Way back, when I first studied statistics it was used by applying certian data to the masses. If it is used to calculate a single event
Nov 1, 2010, 3:27 pm - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum

The Thrifty But Loyal Jackpot Games PlayerReply
$220 MILLIONS UP FOR GRABS IN MEGA MILLIONS AND POWERBALL. I know the odds to win are bigger than other lottery games but they offer the best return for $1.GOOD LUCK EVERYBODY. DO NOT LET MATH FOOL YOU. SOMEONE WILL WIN, THAT IS A FACT.
Oct 29, 2010, 12:25 pm - THRIFTY - Jackpot Games Forum

How Many Tickets Per Draw Are Necessary To Win?Reply
At least with games like PowerBall and MegaMillions with odds of 1:39 and 1:46 of hitting the bonus number you're guaranteed a win if you play all the bonus numbers with 39 or 46 lines. If you're are in a pool playing at least 39 or 46 lines or playing that many lines on your own, you should at least cover all the bonus numbers to guarantee a win and reduce your lost to a maximum of $36 or $44.
Oct 24, 2010, 7:21 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

North Carolina: 10/1 - 10/31/2010Reply
Hey Jack, when you're evaluating due sums, are you looking at just the raw # of skips, or are you looking at # of skips vs. odds of hitting that sum? Reason I ask is that the 1 sum is rare.
Oct 23, 2010, 5:09 pm - Todd - Pick 3 Forum

Lottery bill could limit winner's takeReply
I know exactly what the odds are and I didn't say that is the ONLY way they can get off welfare it's one of many ways to get off the system. The same goes for people who are not on welfare, for some they play for a way out of their situation.
Oct 21, 2010, 9:58 am - stripesnsolids - Lottery News

New California Scratch-Off OddsReply
Yep. the odds will always be as though all winners are available. You mean to tell me that the MINIMUM winner for this game is $100. No $3.00, $10.00, etc. winners? And one hundred eighty five (185) $20,000 winning tickets? Whoa!
Oct 18, 2010, 7:21 am - markaz - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum

Statistical Analysis of Lottery ResultsReply
As GASMETERGUY says, no reasonable player would believes it's possible to mathematically predict the outcomes of each drawing every time but I believe it's possible to come up with a system that improves the odds of winning. I doubt if playing lotteries can ever be profitable without winning a few second prizes or eventually a jackpot. If such a system or algorithm is ever developed we'll probably read about one person or group winning several lottery jackpots within a year, I doubt if they woul
Oct 14, 2010, 9:38 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

PowerBall side betsReply
Amusing observations...lol. Actually, betting eleven to win ten would be a steal compared to the gigantic edge that the lotteries take on every bet. Nobody can realistically expect to make a legal free bet, and I know that I could still make money even laying those odds. I think I'd rather bet with a legal bookie.
Oct 12, 2010, 1:03 am - ayenowitall - Jackpot Games Forum