Search

U.S.A. ..Alert Site for Big Facts onlyReply
Got to be a World Record ! Thanks Badger. Wish we could figure out a place to keep these and have them for easy reference. You know.... there might be more than one record building up here. Maybe there are 2 or 3 We need to figure the odds(probability)on this one.
Mar 19, 2005, 11:11 am - WIN D - Pick 3 Forum

What do you think is the worst game?Reply
I personally like the Quinto game. It's cash at once and the last roll was really nice. Over 4 million in cash with only 2.6 million to one odds. I even have a stratagy on how to deal with the cards but it didn't work this time. I personally think any lucky for life game is a lame waste of money.
Mar 19, 2005, 1:48 am - dvdiva - Lottery Discussion Forum

...Why "Lottery Systems" Don't WorkReply
MillionsWanted,I'm sure it's an interesting article, however, I have opted not to read for two reasons. 1) The page would not display when I clicked on it AND 2) I'm glad it didn't display 'cause, wouldn't you think that it would negate any positive flow you may have going relative to winning millions. Let's face it, the odds may be high, but someone does dventually ends up winning...hey it could be YOU or ME for that matter. When the time comes it just comes!! So let's go win some money!!!!
Mar 17, 2005, 1:49 pm - AriesMoon - Lottery Systems Forum

Streak of jackpot winners is bad luck for Powerball lottery salesReply
Wow it was hit yet again. 120 million to one seems really high odds for a 10 million jackpot game.Guys looks like we'll have to wait until the last two quarters for a large jackpot. That always seems to be when they are largest.
Mar 17, 2005, 12:32 pm - Lottophene - Lottery News

Powerball won AGAIN!!Reply
I don't think the size of the jackpot has anything to do with it. Larger jackpots no doubt attract more players, but there are a lot of players in the 20 something states with Powerball, plus the many players who cross state lines.The more chances people buy, the greater the chance that someone will have the right numbers, regardless of the odds.Just my thoughts.
Mar 17, 2005, 12:17 pm - bobby623 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Powerball won AGAIN!!Reply
People just keep winning this thing. Winning and winning and winning. That would be nice if that was the idea of the game. But the idea of the game is large jackpots that generate excitement. $10,000,000 may not be measly if it was just handed to you. But when the odds are one in 120 million, it's chump change. And keep in mind that's the annuity jackpot before taxes.
Mar 17, 2005, 12:39 am - JimmySand9 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Powerball won AGAIN!!
Someone in Pennsylvania won Powerball tonight. This is very unbelievable. People consistenly beating 120 million to 1 odds to win the Powerball jackpot at such a low sales level.Well, congrats to the winner..
Mar 16, 2005, 11:55 pm - twisted - Lottery Discussion Forum

Hmmmm!!
Here is the last 4 draws from California's Super Lotto. What's interesting to note is that 38 has come up the last 4 picks in a row. What are the odds? Is this an indication that something is amiss? Draw ResultDraw #Draw DatesWinning NumbersMegacolor=#800080 view details187303/16/20051 2 38 41 627color=#800080 view details187203/12/200517 6 38 46 74color=#0000ff view details187103/09/200512 40 30 1 382color=#0000ff view details187003/05/200526 19 38 46 331
Mar 16, 2005, 11:47 pm - JKING - Lottery Discussion Forum

Streak of jackpot winners is bad luck for Powerball lottery salesReply
Admittedly I'm not fluent in Lotterese. I take it that a matrix change would entail the drop of a few more white balls into the chute and the subsequent increase of odds - say maybe 1 in 150 million. Well hey I'll take that! It's too boring to drive by a convenience store and see the familiar powerball signs reading 10 million . . boooring!
Mar 16, 2005, 6:08 pm - Lottophene - Lottery News

Anyone know when Mega starts in CA?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on March 15, 2005Chief,5/63+1/24 = 1:168,692,328 overall 1:22.75/71+1/17 = 1:221,338,453 overall 1:16.55/56+1/46 = 1:175,711,536 overall 1:39.85/56+1/46 sounds more realistic because the overall odds of getting $2 back is more real. In the first two, the lower prizes would be won too often to have a lot of money left to contribute to the jackpot amount and the idea is to create larger jackpots faster.RJOhRJOH:Thanks...Chief
Mar 15, 2005, 8:18 pm - kbcherokee - Jackpot Games Forum