Search

Neural Networks- Applicable to Lottery?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on March 07, 2004My question is:If anyone can detect certain reoccurring patterns with data mining software, why won't states running lotteries use similar software to make sure their systems were truly random? I would think if they found such patterns, they would introduce other factors randomly to make the process truly random and the only constants would be the field and combinations sizes.RJOhWhy do you think they keep increasing the odds for some games?
Mar 16, 2004, 6:56 am - Andrew - Lottery Systems Forum

Ga.Midday/Sat. No doubles right? So...Reply
WIN DYou were on time with this one but unfortunately I did not log on in time. I went back and pulled up your previous post of all odds and all evens, I had the list and you were correct. there were only 9 left to play and that would have cost me $4.50 for $40.00. there's always tomorrow:)Ms pat
Mar 13, 2004, 10:59 pm - Ms. Pat - Pick 3 Forum

Pattern Finder Mich. Day number 3/9-15Reply
Quote: Originally posted by lottaloot on March 13, 2004So the Midday numbers are :451----> 895057----> 491 Now I separate the highs from the lows and the odds from the evens
Mar 13, 2004, 4:15 pm - lottaloot - Pick 3 Forum

Michigan Only - 2/27/04Reply
I have been preaching about repeat numbers from the previous draw like forever. No one seems to pay attention....................at 75% of the time a number is drawn from yesterday's draw.............that is pretty good odds.....I don't go back two draws as Blackapple does, but I make sure and go back one draw................and do it like he does it..........put the numbers right underneath the bottom row key numbers.................Lottaloot, did you get your PM fixed yet? How about that ema
Mar 12, 2004, 3:58 pm - Sandy K - Pick 3 Forum

blessings to allReply
222 has not hit in California since they started drawing twice a day in November of 2002 (986 draws ago). Since the odds are 1000:1, it should be drawn any time now!CalifDude
Mar 12, 2004, 5:50 am - CalifDude - Pick 3 Forum

lottosync 1.7 at 12000 samplesReply
Lottosyncman:I'm not saying sampling 12000 is useless. You'll still have a lot better odds then just plain guessing or using some very dubious other ways to isolate numbers.In this version you should see the sampling for instance as the resolution of a picture . Let's say 12000 produces a picture with lower resolution in which some details get lost, but it still produces an image of the situation. 50000 would produce an image with more detail, and so on.Don't feel like it's doing nothing at all
Mar 12, 2004, 12:54 am - Guru - Lottery Systems Forum

California Daily 3 for 3/11/04 EveningReply
California evening = 109 ... that's a box win!Because I am listing so many numbers each time, I suggest you play a box, not straight/box, because unless you are very lucky (odds 1000:1), you will never catch up with your losses.CalifDude
Mar 11, 2004, 7:44 pm - CalifDude - Pick 3 Forum

Calif.DAY 73 Pair,Returning 93-3/10-14
39--37 HotPossible:379,935,357,317 396,376,374,394,370,392372,930,Double odds like 71,59 seenBut I'm sticking with the lucky --------3----------
Mar 10, 2004, 4:27 am - Blackapple - Pick 3 Forum

Mega Millions 2004-03-09Reply
These are my picks for MegaMillions tonight, but since the state lottery have the same size jackpot and better odds, I think I'll pick up some OH649 tickets too.FILE : MM030904 1. 03 09 22 34 45 +10 2. 10 21 24 36 47 +18 3. 11 16 32 40 50 +39 4. 08 14 20 35 43 +07 5. 01 07 13 25 42 +32 Good luck everyone.RJOh
Mar 9, 2004, 4:25 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum

Winners and their methodsReply
Look at this way, your odds of winning the big one was 1:13M but by nothing playing at all you saved a dollar for sure and got to work on time. A lot of lottery players have missed winning the big one by not playing a group of numbers or just playing part of a group and they promise themselves it will never happen again and then they are hooked win or lose.RJOh
Mar 7, 2004, 6:45 pm - RJOh - Jackpot Games Forum