Search

Lucky could you post 1-2 good numbers for the poor.Reply
Thanks for those figure. When I responded to Lucky Ducky on Maybell he pointed out that the number would be closer to 45 than 60. To Lucky Dog, I didn't mean to imply that it would cost more to box your number, just increase your chance for a match and that Lucky Ducky's list was matching the odds.RJOh
Sep 14, 2001, 7:11 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

www.luckypunt.co.uk
www.LuckyPunt.co.uk - the odds:UK National Lottery 1/57 (3 numbers) = 10 1/1030 (4 numbers) = 62 LuckyPunt1/20 = 2001/1000 = 25,000LuckyPunt - the webs most exclusive and exciting lottery is coming soon.......
Aug 27, 2001, 5:13 am - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Theory May Be A FraudReply
Both of your concepts that you mentioned were disappointing. I received three pages of basic bull and basic common sense. Basically, the theory is that if you wheel a number, the number will eventually come up in a drawing so you reduce your odds. Duh!!!!!!
Aug 23, 2001, 2:04 pm - glenn - Lottery Discussion Forum

easiest/simple lottery to win?
What is the easiest/simple lottery game to win at? Which game has the best odds?
Aug 18, 2001, 6:27 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

FREE Lottery Tickets, this rocks
John, I checked out the site. The game seems to start next month, but I played all of my tickets anyway. The odds are the same as my states lotto game, but free. Why hasn't anyone started a site like this before? Marked it as one of my favorites, may the numbers be with me!
Aug 17, 2001, 11:31 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Easy Pick Big GameReply
I usually buy a couple of tickets and choose my own numbers using trend analysis....But..I would relly be interested in your quick-pics....With 80 million to 1 odds...Anything is as good as anything else...I can see the headlines now...54million dollar ticket chosen by the quick-pic program off of the BIGGAMELOTTERY site..ha,ha..
Aug 16, 2001, 4:51 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Powerball 100m/54.9m ca$h for Wed 8/15Reply
RJoh: The purpose of Lotto South is to allow players to try for larger jackpots than in the three separate lotto games, but without the 1 in 75+ million jackpot odds for the Big Game. Single-state jackpot games are losing favor (with a few exceptions.) The new lottery director in Michigan is being urged to replace Michigan Millions with a proposed multi-state game.
Aug 14, 2001, 10:29 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum

Powerball 100m/54.9m ca$h for Wed 8/15Reply
Kentucky has the Powerball now. There would be no point in having a new game that competes with it. I suspect Lotto South will have better odds and smaller jackpots most of the times, and Ohio will update its games if neccesary to compete.RJOh
Aug 14, 2001, 6:35 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

daily is goneReply
I just checked his web site, and he has a statement on the 2nd page that he's taking down his free numbers in a few days. Too bad -- I think he's helped a lot of people realize that it's possible to beat the odds.Maybe someone should start an online petition? Anyone who wants to start a petition thread on Lottery Post for D#'s to keep his free numbers updated free is welcome...-Todd
Aug 12, 2001, 10:08 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Ohio Super Lotto at $ 54 Million Help!!!!!Reply
Hello Pat,I seldom play the kicker, but I suppose there are those who plays the auto lotto and the kicker that just want to spend a dollar or two just to be in the game. As long as you are losing, it really doesn't matter how you lose. Several times a month, there are big winners in the kicker game and the odds are as good as any game we have,you just can't pick your own numbers.
Jul 8, 2001, 10:23 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum