Search

Mega Millions LotteryReply
Another thing to consider is the starting Jackpot value and if it'll have minimum increases. Reports are coming out that MM will have new $15M starting value and adding minimum $5M increases. Here is a comparison table of the old and new prize structure: _ MEGA Millions $1 _ MM New Matrix Total Return Prizes Odds 1 in Match Total Return Prizes Odds 1 in 50.00% $55,870,000 175,711,536 5 + Mega 50.00% $84,350,000 258,890,850 18.20% $250,000 3,904,701 5 of 5 17.42% $1,000,000
Jul 17, 2013, 9:01 am - Jon D - Lottery Discussion Forum

V153 travelReply
Vtracs are used to classify hits and are frequently used for pick 3 games. There are many different systems and methods to classify digits and sets of digits (e.g. 562 is drawn and is the set. The digits of the set are 5, 6, 2). So among the many ways people have developed to classify the history of draws, Vtracs is just one way. The strength of using Vtracs is in simplification. Instead of 1,000 combinations in P3, you have 125 Vtracs that represent all those combinations, in the order o
Jul 14, 2013, 5:45 pm - marilyn321 - Pick 3 Forum

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Stack47 muttered, Don Catlin is one of over 50 people who writes articles for Casino City Times and I'm one of almost 145,000 that posts on Lottery Post. 145,000 that posts? Really? Quoting that number as the number of [present tense] posters is like claiming the number of living and breathing Americans includes all those that have since passed away, rather than the true number in the 312M area. Have you counted the number of unique LP posters over the last 6 months? Regardless, comparing
Jul 3, 2013, 2:14 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum

$260 MILLION: Powerball lottery jackpot surgesReply
the irony is someone said all bday numbers last draw , it was hit for sure then it rolled am going to rofl HARD if its hit, u did it us in whiteballz! joking aside, thro odds are getting high soon this thing should be won if not tonite to many people playin, thro odds are sure above 50% on any given draw below 400m, am thinkin at lest 25 wins of 2nd place winners 5-0 tonite. its good as dead come above 400m mark, as it just fly's to 500/600m range as only 2 jackpots have pro
Mar 21, 2013, 12:10 am - joshuacloak - Lottery News

N.C. bill keeps 'education' in lottery for nowNews Story
The North Carolina Education Lottery is keeping the education in its name at least for now. A bill debated Wednesday by a House judiciary committee and aimed at reeling in advertising for the state-run lottery originally directed the lottery to stop using the word education in its advertising. But the bill's chief sponsor said he would pull that prohibition because he didn't want to make the cost of such a rebranding drag down the bill, which he said is designed to bring more truth to what
Mar 7, 2013, 4:35 pm - Todd - Lottery News

N.C. lawmakers back lottery name changeNews Story
Act would cut 'education' from name, limit advertising Powerball tickets aren't like parent-teacher bake sales, say state lawmakers who want to take education out of the North Carolina Education Lottery. The state-run games would be known as the North Carolina State Lottery under a bipartisan bill filed in the House last week that also would place limits on lottery advertising and commission research on the lotto's social and economic impact. We certainly don't want to encourage partic
Mar 5, 2013, 8:37 am - Todd - Lottery News

Super Sunday SystemReply
All am saying is your draw set should trigger a SECTION of a the POOL, this is where your focus should be, so if assumed recent draw set is 123 and my system triggers 211, then the section to consider is 211 and all my odds is on 211. The pool members are not arranged sequentially 01234.........9, when the event is bound to occur.You may call that section a Base, a SUB. You're betting your odds on these Sections instead of the big section (0-9). Now , the posed question should be ' how effective
Mar 1, 2013, 9:31 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Fallacies, and two REAL ways of improving your chancesReply
Steve Player is saying select 2 different numbers such as 1, 2 then he has a chart that tells you the 54 combos to play. So lets do it the hard way, the following are pairs that can be made from 10 numbers with no duplicates: (1,2) (1,3) (1,4) (1,5) (1,6) (1,7) (1,8) (1,9) (1,0) (2,3) (2,4) (2,5) (2,6) (2,7) (2,8) (2,9) (2,0) (3,4) (3,5) (3,6) (3,7) (3,8) (3,9) (3,0) (4,5) (4,6) (4.7) (4.8) (4.9) (4.0) (5,6) (5,7) (5,8) (5,9) (5,0) (6,7) (6,8) (6,9) (6,0) (7,8) (7,9) (7,0
Feb 4, 2013, 10:49 pm - jimjwright - Lottery Discussion Forum

Fallacies, and two REAL ways of improving your chancesReply
The fallacy in reviewing the system is the insistance of taking it line by line as those odds never change, each line has an equal chance of being drawn. The difference is between having a chance to win a jackpot in every draw in a reduced 6/36 field versus quicks picks where a post review finds no chance of winning a jackpot in most draws. Look at it this way. Two people walk into a lottery ticket store. One purchases 8 Quick Picks. The other purchases 8 randoml
Jan 31, 2013, 4:55 pm - BobP - Lottery Discussion Forum

NY Lotto adds only $300k now?!
NY Lotto had no jackpot winner, however, last time $500k was added, not $300k, and now +$600k!? It is up to $14.2m, lump sum = $9.1m. Buy $5, get $2QP. However, SM buy $5 get $3QP. Thus, Lotto 1:45m / 14 = 3.2m SM 1:3.8m / 8 = 480k; 480k x 9.1m = 4.37m x1.36 isnt much considering SM's lower prizes are higher.. As for SM vs. Take5: $1m / $50k(Take5 average) = 20; 20 x 575757 = 11.5m; 11.5m / 3.8m = 3 You are only x3 more likely to win $1m with SM than Take5; however, again
Jan 24, 2013, 12:23 pm - POMAH - Jackpot Games Forum