Search

Why gamble at Online Lottery Sites?Reply
Take your money is right.... The problem is beating the pick-3 at a thousand to one. Forget 23,000,000 to 1.Chewie....you have a choice.....and that is stick to the best possible odds which is the Pick-3.Trust me I know everything.....Once I find the code, there will be forces trying to obtain the secrets. By then it will be nearly impossible for them to intercede.At that point all knowing-affirmations will protect me from any outer forces. Futility will reign on the part of the betrayer.By then
Aug 16, 2005, 7:35 pm - pacattack05 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Online LotteryReply
I had always thought the problem was with the people pushing their affiliate advertising on LotteryPost without paying to get you to join because they win when you lose and get to play on your money. It's one thing when people are trying to improve your odds another when they are shilling just for themselves. The site itself gets pretty good press from the sites that review it. When it comes to anything online you have to have some common sense when it comes to amounts you leave in your accoun
Aug 16, 2005, 3:14 am - BobP - Lottery Discussion Forum

California...Reply
me too, Winner 2 Be....I only played the 111 222.......hoping for a 2 digit return or the 11 vtrac to come back...8/15/20052,2,2N8/15/2005CA Midday$0.25$225.00 Kinda threw me for a loop also.....Cali has been very slow with those trips...haven't played them but the 221 floated all over the computer screen yesterday so I decided to play the 222 111If you want to condense your triple plays.....I usually wait for a double and play the double back with it's digit.......miss some trips that way b
Aug 15, 2005, 5:48 pm - Sandy K - Pick 3 Forum

Why gamble at Online Lottery Sites?Reply
Chewie,The one thing you should consider about the Euromillions and UK Lotto is that they are all-cash jackpots - no tax - and they have excellent lower-tier prizes.In particular, take a look at Euromillions when the jackpot gets big, because it's a tremendous deal.Also, many people like UK Lotto because of great combination of excellent all-cash prizes, plus the odds of a 6/49 game.Because of the all-cash prizes, plus no tax, you can think of a $50 Millions Euro Millions jackpot as being as Pow
Aug 15, 2005, 1:07 pm - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

superball(one huge multistate game)Reply
The odds would be ridiculous as if 170 million to 1 isn't bad enough. If they're going to create a new mega lottery, i think the authorities would be well advised to counter program against the current format of one winner take all. Maybe they could run a monthly lottery where the sales for that month determine the number of million-dollar winners. As the sales of lottery tickets accumulate during the month, each day the lottery could announce the number of million dollar tickets that would be d
Aug 14, 2005, 8:19 pm - lchoro - Lottery Discussion Forum

Is less best? $93 million vs $10 millionReply
For me it is a question of personal choice because I play for the powerball jackpots when they are climbing like the 93 million one just recently. But I noticed that my state lottery is high again at 15.5 million and since the odds are 1 in 7 million I like to play it when it is high. I don't try to spend too much on the lottery since it is my form of entertainment ten bucks a week keeps the dream alive at some sizeable jackpot. I would be happy with either pot to answer your question on whic
Aug 14, 2005, 6:48 pm - weshar75 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Is less best? $93 million vs $10 millionReply
I play mostly 5 and 6 number games when I play (we have no lottery in Alabama, so I play multi draw when travelling to states that have lottery).A $10M jackpot would be more than adequate for me. Shoot, having a $1M payout after taxes would suit me fine. Even assuming no interest, I could pay myself $4,000 per month out of the principal for a little over 20 years and live quite comfortably.I'm a little ahead of the game in 5 number games (Lucky 5 and Fantasy 5), having won $200+ twice (IN Luck
Aug 14, 2005, 5:42 pm - MrBobb - Lottery Discussion Forum

All multi-state lotto gamesReply
It's highly unlikely Powerball could do it, based on the stupid $25 M jackpot growth rule noted earlier. The MUSL staff are largely cronies of Dr. Stanek (of Iowa - the smartest man in the world - just ask him and he'll tell you). How much money did lotteries lose on their most recent consortia-wide brainchild Daily Millions ( where millions play and lose daily )? They would not know a real idea if it fell out of their BS security standards manual. All of the big games are getting hit too of
Aug 14, 2005, 1:04 am - Drivedabizness - Lottery Discussion Forum

New Mexico Lottery still looking for $93 million Powerball winnerReply
This is how they will be able to start it at $15m and watch how much the jackpots increase.Or, if you prefer, this is how they'll be able to start at $7 million dollars used from ticket sales to pay off the winners who don't care about having their money invested at a low interest rate by people they don't know, and have no reason to trust to act in their best interests.The amount of money they're willing to pay out immediately to winners, after they've increased the odds against the players, wi
Aug 13, 2005, 12:43 pm - Rip Snorter - Lottery News

Is it possible to make a profit (Pick 3)Reply
Hello,First of all,for me,i woud'nt think fo making the lottery a business or anything that you bet on their are odds and as long as they exist their is a possilbe lost,maybe some people are lucky but i willing to bet that its just a few that are,because the lottery games would go broke if too many win. So this is what i keep in mind ,You can win but don't count on it,I won't play my rent on a number. Okay on the good side, i figure this amazing posts here for all of us to discuss methods ,ways
Aug 13, 2005, 5:04 am - delores247 - Lottery Discussion Forum