- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 10:43 pm
You last visited
June 29, 2026, 12:29 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
Texas: 3/1 - 3/31/2013
Looking at my charts I the 026 in the generations. I just went with the 056 :( I went with a Sum Total Odd instead of Sum Total Even. Had a no repeat from 791 set and Sum less then last.
025 026 036 055 056 066 086 825 088 035 835
Get one digit that is going to draw, figure out what position will be in (1st, 2nd, 3rd) and you can reduce your Pick 3 odds from 1:1000 to 1:100 for the EXACT. Look to Repeats for that 1 digit.
Mar 5, 2013, 4:57 pm - Clipper - Pick 3 Forum
6/49 14 Million Combinations narrowed down to 500 -8000 combinations -Its possible!
Onlymoney unfortunately this ONLY applies to Lotto games 5-6 numbers and Powerball 5 nrs. Its been programmed maybe later I will look into other loteries. For now I want to concentrate on the bigger lottos like
Megamillions,Powerball,Uk Lottery etc.......I have tested the method and the Patern exist for all -my advice is study study previous results for clear cut paterns They DO exist
The odds winning a 6/49 lottery is high infact it astronomical with different sequences. I am working arou
Mar 5, 2013, 12:04 pm - Ricklou - Lottery Discussion Forum
Do some number combinations have better odds?
Ronnie316
For MM regardless of which 18 numbers you select there are 501,942 sets that won't have any of the 18 numbers
so the odds could be expressed as 1 in 7.61. 3,819,816/501,942=7.61
RL
Mar 4, 2013, 12:57 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Lottery Discussion Forum
Do some number combinations have better odds?
LottoBoner,
I'm sorry you feel so desperate. When you say, She [Gail Howard] offers a ray of hope in a landscape desperation, it's hard not to ask if you've ever consulted with someone who could give you some insight into what underlies your inordinate need to believe you can engineer an advantage over the majority of us who accept the posted odds.
--Jimmy4164
Mar 4, 2013, 12:06 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum
Do some number combinations have better odds?
I know Ronnie316 won't see this post but maybe someone will relay my congratulations to him on his beating those 1 in 3 odds of matching 4 of 5 from a subset of 39. That's right. This can only be expected to happen about once every three draws! In fact, if he's patient, he can expect to hit 5 of 5 about once every nine draws. This is hard work, but I'm sure he can handle it.
And here's a little secret someone should pass on to him. If he really wants to impress people, he should up his subset
Feb 28, 2013, 3:17 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum
Post your scratch ticket results
DK, do not buy a $1000 card for over $600. The State takes 7% out for taxes when you turn the ticket in and then you pay the Feds another 25% the following year so in essence you are only getting $680 for a $1000 ticket. Combined lottery taxes in NC currently stands at a whopping 32%!
You beat some nice odds to hit $400 twice! I can t believe you are working the Rudy Reds over like that as I can t win on that card to save my life but as we both known, I am just not hitting the door at th
Feb 28, 2013, 9:27 am - FiveXChamps - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum
Doubles! Doubles! and distinct triggers!
Playing doubles is a tricky situation, with this chart, is more of waging strategy than a system. I have always said predictions based on historical data is flawed when dealing with random events. I like the approach of sectionalized pool , meaning we select a section of pool when waging.This approach may draw critics to site all theories of probability laws, forgeting probabilty is a fluid concept on MOMENTARY DATA. Is best to take the odds/probabilty relating to the pool (0-9) out of the pictu
Feb 27, 2013, 5:00 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum
Texas All or Nothing
I looked pretty hard at playing pairs. Problem with playing for pair hits is that the payout is too low to really make any profit. You're doing well to maybe break even...maybe. When I play D4, I like to play $4 or $5 straight for a big score. Once in a great while I'll throw an extra buck at boxed also, but usually just straight. One hit will knock some debt off my monthly budget. The 10000 to 1 odds is what keeps me interested.
I don't do a lot of fancy work with the numbers, I try to figur
Feb 27, 2013, 9:25 am - rcbbuckeye - Lottery Discussion Forum
Texas All or Nothing
A further look at Pick 4 suggests it is almost impossible to get an edge.
I'm going to go to an Indian reservation for a week and smoke the piece
pipe and dream of winning numbers. I will let you guys know what I get
Maybe front pair back pair would be easier. The odds chart says 1:100
Feb 26, 2013, 8:58 pm - Oso Grande - Lottery Discussion Forum
Texas: 2/1 - 2/28/2013
Actually what I do is nothing like what anybody else does or their software can do. This software that was designed expressley for the system I developed is nothing like anything out there. That's why I never could find software to use and had to have one created for me.
I know some people use Excel but even this software is nothing like Excel. I have total control of the numbers and can block and filter out in a variety of ways and watch the 220 sets dwindle down to practically nothing. Jus
Feb 26, 2013, 1:37 am - Clipper - Pick 3 Forum
